Preoperative screening thoracic radiographs yield few significant abnormalities in dogs with no history or exam findings suggestive of thoracic disease.
Kristine M Moss, Christopher M Gauthier, Elissa K Randall
{"title":"Preoperative screening thoracic radiographs yield few significant abnormalities in dogs with no history or exam findings suggestive of thoracic disease.","authors":"Kristine M Moss, Christopher M Gauthier, Elissa K Randall","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.11.0352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the utility of routine preanesthetic screening thoracic radiographs in dogs without a specific clinical indication for this test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients presented for elective tibial plateau leveling osteotomy between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2022, were enrolled if there were no clinical signs or history of neoplasia or cardiopulmonary or thoracic disease. Three-view thoracic radiographic studies were performed and evaluated by the attending surgeon and a board-certified veterinary radiologist. The incidence of radiographic abnormalities and agreement between the attending clinician and the radiologist were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 281 cases evaluated in this study, 10 (3.6%) were found to have radiographic abnormalities that were likely to affect the clinician's decision to proceed with elective surgery. There was no association between patient age and the probability of diagnosing a significant radiographic abnormality. There was poor agreement between the findings of the clinician and radiologist for cardiovascular and pulmonary abnormalities. There was slight agreement between the findings of the clinician and the radiologist for extrathoracic abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest that the utility of preoperative screening thoracic radiographs in dogs with no specific clinical indications for this test appears to be low. Given the poor agreement between clinician and radiologist findings, clinicians should consider routine evaluation of thoracic radiographs by a radiologist.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>These findings should be considered by a clinician when deciding whether to recommend thoracic radiographs as a screening tool for a patient without history or physical examination findings suggestive of intrathoracic disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.11.0352","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the utility of routine preanesthetic screening thoracic radiographs in dogs without a specific clinical indication for this test.
Methods: All patients presented for elective tibial plateau leveling osteotomy between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2022, were enrolled if there were no clinical signs or history of neoplasia or cardiopulmonary or thoracic disease. Three-view thoracic radiographic studies were performed and evaluated by the attending surgeon and a board-certified veterinary radiologist. The incidence of radiographic abnormalities and agreement between the attending clinician and the radiologist were analyzed.
Results: Of the 281 cases evaluated in this study, 10 (3.6%) were found to have radiographic abnormalities that were likely to affect the clinician's decision to proceed with elective surgery. There was no association between patient age and the probability of diagnosing a significant radiographic abnormality. There was poor agreement between the findings of the clinician and radiologist for cardiovascular and pulmonary abnormalities. There was slight agreement between the findings of the clinician and the radiologist for extrathoracic abnormalities.
Conclusions: Our data suggest that the utility of preoperative screening thoracic radiographs in dogs with no specific clinical indications for this test appears to be low. Given the poor agreement between clinician and radiologist findings, clinicians should consider routine evaluation of thoracic radiographs by a radiologist.
Clinical relevance: These findings should be considered by a clinician when deciding whether to recommend thoracic radiographs as a screening tool for a patient without history or physical examination findings suggestive of intrathoracic disease.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.