Maritza Ramos-Ramírez, Enrique Caballe-Pérez, José Lucio-Lozada, Eunice Romero-Nuñez, Cesar Castillo-Ruiz, Lorena Dorantes-Sánchez, Diana Flores-Estrada, Gonzalo Recondo, Pedro Barrios-Bernal, Luis Cabrera-Miranda, Heyman Bravo-Dominguez, Norma Hernández-Pedro, Oscar Arrieta
{"title":"Immunomodulatory role of oncogenic alterations in non-small cell lung cancer: a review of implications for immunotherapy.","authors":"Maritza Ramos-Ramírez, Enrique Caballe-Pérez, José Lucio-Lozada, Eunice Romero-Nuñez, Cesar Castillo-Ruiz, Lorena Dorantes-Sánchez, Diana Flores-Estrada, Gonzalo Recondo, Pedro Barrios-Bernal, Luis Cabrera-Miranda, Heyman Bravo-Dominguez, Norma Hernández-Pedro, Oscar Arrieta","doi":"10.1007/s10555-025-10245-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lacking targetable oncogenic alterations. However, their efficacy in individuals with such genomic alterations remains heterogeneous and poorly understood. In detail, certain oncogenic alterations in TP53, EGFR (uncommon mutations), KRAS (G12C), BRAF (non-V600E), MET (amplifications), FGFR1 and FGFR4, actively modify MAPK, PI3K, and STING signaling, thus remodeling tumoral immune phenotype and are associated with high TMB counts, enriched T lymphocyte tumor infiltration, and high expression of antigen-presenting molecules, supporting their consideration as part of the eligibility criteria for ICIs treatment. Nonetheless, other oncogenic alterations are associated with an immunosuppressive TME, low TMB counts, and downregulation of targetable immune checkpoints, in which novel therapeutic approaches are currently being tested to overcome their intrinsic resistance. In this context, this review discusses the fundamental mechanisms by which frequent driver alterations affect ICIs efficacy in patients with NSCLC, and outlines their prognostic relevance in the era of immunotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9489,"journal":{"name":"Cancer and Metastasis Reviews","volume":"44 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer and Metastasis Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-025-10245-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lacking targetable oncogenic alterations. However, their efficacy in individuals with such genomic alterations remains heterogeneous and poorly understood. In detail, certain oncogenic alterations in TP53, EGFR (uncommon mutations), KRAS (G12C), BRAF (non-V600E), MET (amplifications), FGFR1 and FGFR4, actively modify MAPK, PI3K, and STING signaling, thus remodeling tumoral immune phenotype and are associated with high TMB counts, enriched T lymphocyte tumor infiltration, and high expression of antigen-presenting molecules, supporting their consideration as part of the eligibility criteria for ICIs treatment. Nonetheless, other oncogenic alterations are associated with an immunosuppressive TME, low TMB counts, and downregulation of targetable immune checkpoints, in which novel therapeutic approaches are currently being tested to overcome their intrinsic resistance. In this context, this review discusses the fundamental mechanisms by which frequent driver alterations affect ICIs efficacy in patients with NSCLC, and outlines their prognostic relevance in the era of immunotherapy.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary biomedical research is on the threshold of an era in which physiological and pathological processes can be analyzed in increasingly precise and mechanistic terms.The transformation of biology from a largely descriptive, phenomenological discipline to one in which the regulatory principles can be understood and manipulated with predictability brings a new dimension to the study of cancer and the search for effective therapeutic modalities for this disease. Cancer and Metastasis Reviews provides a forum for critical review and discussion of these challenging developments.
A major function of the journal is to review some of the more important and interesting recent developments in the biology and treatment of malignant disease, as well as to highlight new and promising directions, be they technological or conceptual. Contributors are encouraged to review their personal work and be speculative.