A real-world pharmacovigilance study of sacubitril\valsartan in older people: data mining of the FDA adverse event reporting system.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2025.2464888
Zheng Kuai, Quan Li, Xiaoyi Zhang, Guowen Tang, Yangli Ye, Yu Hu
{"title":"A real-world pharmacovigilance study of sacubitril\\valsartan in older people: data mining of the FDA adverse event reporting system.","authors":"Zheng Kuai, Quan Li, Xiaoyi Zhang, Guowen Tang, Yangli Ye, Yu Hu","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2464888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sacubitril\\valsartan is widely used in the clinical management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and hypertension. This study aims to systematically investigate and quantify the safety signals and potential risks associated with sacubitril\\valsartan in individuals aged 65 and older, leveraging data from the FAERS database to provide insights into its real-world safety profile.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Disproportionality analyses, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms, were employed to quantify the signals of Sacubitril\\valsartan-associated AEs in elderly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search retrieved 94,210 sacubitril\\valsartan-associated cases within the reporting period; 86 PTs with significant disproportionality were retained in 65 + . Reports emerged for several cognitive-related AEs and several fragility acceleration AEs, which were rare. Unexpected safety signals such as 'Injury, poisoning, and procedural complications' were only detected in 65 + . Most of the cases occurred within the first month after sacubitril\\valsartan initiation, and this was consistent across age groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found potential new AEs signals and might provide important support for clinical monitoring and risk identification of Sacubitril\\valsartan in elderly.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2464888","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sacubitril\valsartan is widely used in the clinical management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and hypertension. This study aims to systematically investigate and quantify the safety signals and potential risks associated with sacubitril\valsartan in individuals aged 65 and older, leveraging data from the FAERS database to provide insights into its real-world safety profile.

Methods: Disproportionality analyses, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms, were employed to quantify the signals of Sacubitril\valsartan-associated AEs in elderly.

Results: The search retrieved 94,210 sacubitril\valsartan-associated cases within the reporting period; 86 PTs with significant disproportionality were retained in 65 + . Reports emerged for several cognitive-related AEs and several fragility acceleration AEs, which were rare. Unexpected safety signals such as 'Injury, poisoning, and procedural complications' were only detected in 65 + . Most of the cases occurred within the first month after sacubitril\valsartan initiation, and this was consistent across age groups.

Conclusions: Our study found potential new AEs signals and might provide important support for clinical monitoring and risk identification of Sacubitril\valsartan in elderly.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sacubitril /缬沙坦在老年人中的实际药物警戒研究:FDA不良事件报告系统的数据挖掘。
背景:萨比里尔/缬沙坦被广泛用于临床治疗心力衰竭伴射血分数降低和高血压。本研究旨在利用FAERS数据库的数据,系统地调查和量化65岁及以上人群中与沙比里尔/缬沙坦相关的安全信号和潜在风险,以深入了解其实际安全性概况。方法:采用歧化分析方法,包括报告优势比(ROR)、比例报告比(PRR)、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPNN)和多项目伽玛泊松收缩器(MGPS)算法,量化老年人Sacubitril /缬沙坦相关ae的信号。结果:在报告期内检索到94,210例sacubitril /缬沙坦相关病例;65岁以上患者保留了86个显著歧化的PTs。报告出现了几个认知相关的ae和几个脆弱性加速ae,这是罕见的。意外的安全信号,如“受伤、中毒和手术并发症”仅在65岁以上的人群中被发现。大多数病例发生在苏比里尔/缬沙坦开始治疗后的第一个月内,这在各年龄组中是一致的。结论:我们的研究发现了潜在的新的ae信号,可能为老年人服用沙比坦的临床监测和风险识别提供重要支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
期刊最新文献
Safety and efficacy of currently used drug therapies for treatment of lymphomas in patients with Sjögren's disease, a scoping review. Insights gained from drug utilization research to improve safe clinical practice for children and adolescents in Denmark. Safe prescribing of antihypertensive drugs in the elderly and managing the risk of adverse events. Safety concerns associated with various types of statins: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database. Increased reporting of accidental overdose with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a population-based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1