Comparative safety analysis of Hedgehog inhibitor preparations: insights from the FAERS database.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2025.2466668
Yijiang Liu, Gen Li, Chengliang Wang, Jia Chen, Li Chen
{"title":"Comparative safety analysis of Hedgehog inhibitor preparations: insights from the FAERS database.","authors":"Yijiang Liu, Gen Li, Chengliang Wang, Jia Chen, Li Chen","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2466668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vismodegib and sonidegib are currently the only Hedgehog inhibitors (HHIs) approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of locally advanced BCC (laBCC). However, there is limited systematic research comparing the adverse drug events (ADEs) associated with these two inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Data were extracted from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) for the period from 2019 to the second quarter of 2024. Disproportionality analysis was conducted to compare ADEs between vismodegib and sonidegib.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The occurrence of ADEs was notably higher among patients aged ≥ 65 years (72.98%) and males (60.17%). The most frequently reported ADEs associated with HHIs included skeletal muscle and joint diseases and nervous system disorders, particularly muscle spasms and dysgeusia. Differences in adverse reactions between vismodegib and sonidegib were observed, mainly in nervous system, gastrointestinal system, skin and subcutaneous tissue, and renal and urinary disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This analysis, using the FAERS database, enhances understanding of the ADE profiles associated with both vismodegib and sonidegib. Further research is needed to validate the hypotheses generated by this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2466668","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vismodegib and sonidegib are currently the only Hedgehog inhibitors (HHIs) approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of locally advanced BCC (laBCC). However, there is limited systematic research comparing the adverse drug events (ADEs) associated with these two inhibitors.

Research design and methods: Data were extracted from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) for the period from 2019 to the second quarter of 2024. Disproportionality analysis was conducted to compare ADEs between vismodegib and sonidegib.

Results: The occurrence of ADEs was notably higher among patients aged ≥ 65 years (72.98%) and males (60.17%). The most frequently reported ADEs associated with HHIs included skeletal muscle and joint diseases and nervous system disorders, particularly muscle spasms and dysgeusia. Differences in adverse reactions between vismodegib and sonidegib were observed, mainly in nervous system, gastrointestinal system, skin and subcutaneous tissue, and renal and urinary disorders.

Conclusions: This analysis, using the FAERS database, enhances understanding of the ADE profiles associated with both vismodegib and sonidegib. Further research is needed to validate the hypotheses generated by this study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刺猬蛋白抑制剂制剂的安全性比较分析:来自FAERS数据库的见解。
背景:Vismodegib和sonidegib是目前唯一被美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准用于治疗局部晚期BCC (laBCC)的Hedgehog抑制剂(HHIs)。然而,比较这两种抑制剂相关的药物不良事件(ADEs)的系统研究有限。研究设计和方法:数据取自美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS),时间为2019年至2024年第二季度。歧化分析比较维莫替吉与索尼替吉的ade。结果:≥65岁(72.98%)和男性(60.17%)的ade发生率较高。最常报道的与HHIs相关的ade包括骨骼肌和关节疾病以及神经系统疾病,特别是肌肉痉挛和发音困难。观察维莫德吉与索尼地吉不良反应的差异,主要表现在神经系统、胃肠系统、皮肤和皮下组织以及肾脏和泌尿系统疾病。结论:该分析使用FAERS数据库,增强了对vismodegib和sonidegib相关ADE概况的理解。需要进一步的研究来验证本研究产生的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
期刊最新文献
Insights gained from drug utilization research to improve safe clinical practice for children and adolescents in Denmark. GLP-1-derived therapies and risk of sarcopenia: myth or reality? Cardiorenometabolic medicine as a new subspecialty in the light of novel pharmaceuticals with dual or triple benefits. Lessons from examining the safety of drugs for COVID-19 during pregnancy. Who is missing from SGLT-2 inhibitor trials? Implications for drug safety and generalizability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1