Understanding cardiac arrest dispatch of physician-paramedic critical care prehospital teams: a survey-based evaluation.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Emergency Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1136/emermed-2024-214178
Sarah Morton, Chris Eagle, Scott Wallman, Gaynor Wareham, Rob Major, Christopher Edmunds, Sarah McLachlan
{"title":"Understanding cardiac arrest dispatch of physician-paramedic critical care prehospital teams: a survey-based evaluation.","authors":"Sarah Morton, Chris Eagle, Scott Wallman, Gaynor Wareham, Rob Major, Christopher Edmunds, Sarah McLachlan","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Appropriate dispatch of critical care teams to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has been identified as a research priority emergency care in the UK. The study aimed to understand the criteria informing the decision to dispatch a critical care physician-paramedic prehospital team to OHCA in one UK region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An invitation to participate in an anonymised online survey was sent by email to clinicians and non-clinicians working on the critical care (physician-paramedic) dispatch desk for the East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust between June and July 2023. Demographic data relating to the experience of the dispatchers were collected alongside evaluating the effect of 15 predetermined criteria on OHCA dispatch (based on a pilot survey) on their decision to dispatch a physician-paramedic team. Responses to closed-end questions were calculated as percentages. A compulsory free text question on dispatching the physician-paramedic team was included. Free text data were interpreted by one author and the interpretation reviewed by all authors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>20 respondents (19 critical care paramedics and one non-clinical dispatcher) participated, yielding a 79% response rate for clinical and 17% for non-clinical dispatchers. 'Witnessed cardiac arrest' and return of spontaneous circulation achieved on scene were criteria used by 100% of respondents in informing dispatch of a physician-paramedic team to OHCA. 10 of the 15 preidentified criteria were considered important in their decision-making by at least 75% of respondents. 'Age' was considered as more than just a number, instead incorporating both the nuances of a paediatric cardiac arrest and the importance of physiological reserve and frailty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The only 100% agreement in dispatch criteria was 'witnessed arrest'. Otherwise, variation existed and additional information, like identification of frailty, was gathered to support nuanced decision-making. Wider research across the UK would help identify factors and commonalities in OHCA physician-paramedic dispatch to target improved survival rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"249-255"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214178","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Appropriate dispatch of critical care teams to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has been identified as a research priority emergency care in the UK. The study aimed to understand the criteria informing the decision to dispatch a critical care physician-paramedic prehospital team to OHCA in one UK region.

Methods: An invitation to participate in an anonymised online survey was sent by email to clinicians and non-clinicians working on the critical care (physician-paramedic) dispatch desk for the East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust between June and July 2023. Demographic data relating to the experience of the dispatchers were collected alongside evaluating the effect of 15 predetermined criteria on OHCA dispatch (based on a pilot survey) on their decision to dispatch a physician-paramedic team. Responses to closed-end questions were calculated as percentages. A compulsory free text question on dispatching the physician-paramedic team was included. Free text data were interpreted by one author and the interpretation reviewed by all authors.

Results: 20 respondents (19 critical care paramedics and one non-clinical dispatcher) participated, yielding a 79% response rate for clinical and 17% for non-clinical dispatchers. 'Witnessed cardiac arrest' and return of spontaneous circulation achieved on scene were criteria used by 100% of respondents in informing dispatch of a physician-paramedic team to OHCA. 10 of the 15 preidentified criteria were considered important in their decision-making by at least 75% of respondents. 'Age' was considered as more than just a number, instead incorporating both the nuances of a paediatric cardiac arrest and the importance of physiological reserve and frailty.

Conclusion: The only 100% agreement in dispatch criteria was 'witnessed arrest'. Otherwise, variation existed and additional information, like identification of frailty, was gathered to support nuanced decision-making. Wider research across the UK would help identify factors and commonalities in OHCA physician-paramedic dispatch to target improved survival rates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解心脏骤停的医生-护理人员急救院前团队调度:基于调查的评估。
背景:在英国,适当派遣重症监护小组到院外心脏骤停(OHCA)已被确定为研究优先的紧急护理。该研究旨在了解在英国某地区向OHCA派遣重症监护医师-护理人员院前小组的决定依据。方法:在2023年6月至7月期间,通过电子邮件向东英格兰救护车服务NHS信托基金会危重病护理(医生-护理人员)调度台的临床医生和非临床医生发送了参与匿名在线调查的邀请。收集了与调员经验有关的人口统计数据,同时评估了OHCA派遣的15项预定标准(基于试点调查)对其派遣医生-护理人员小组决定的影响。封闭式问题的回答以百分比计算。其中包括一个强制性的免费文本问题,内容是关于派遣医生-护理人员团队的。自由文本数据由一位作者解读,所有作者审阅解读。结果:20名受访者(19名重症护理护理人员和1名非临床调度员)参与了调查,临床调度员的回复率为79%,非临床调度员的回复率为17%。“目睹心脏骤停”和现场实现自然循环的恢复是100%的受访者在通知向OHCA派遣医生护理小组时使用的标准。在15个预先确定的标准中,有10个被至少75%的受访者认为对他们的决策很重要。“年龄”被认为不仅仅是一个数字,而是结合了儿科心脏骤停的细微差别以及生理储备和脆弱的重要性。结论:派送标准中唯一100%一致的是“目击逮捕”。否则,变异就会存在,额外的信息,比如脆弱的识别,就会被收集起来,以支持细微的决策。在英国进行更广泛的研究将有助于确定OHCA医生-护理人员调度的因素和共性,以提高生存率为目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
期刊最新文献
Nightclub deaths in the UK: a retrospective observational study of media reports with coroner verification. Community emergency medicine: a service review of patients that sustain head injuries in the community-can early intervention by a senior clinical decision maker provide care closer to home? From triage to transformation: tackling inequalities in emergency care through a public health lens. Refocusing peer review on science rather than formatting requirements. Prehospital management of acute behavioural disturbance: managing severe agitation in the prehospital setting - a systematic literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1