Michiel M Smeenk, Vincent van der Noort, Jeroen M A Hendrikx, Hanieh Abedian Kalkhoran, Egbert F Smit, Willemijn S M E Theelen
{"title":"Pembrolizumab hybrid dosing is non-inferior to flat dosing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world, retrospective bicenter cohort study.","authors":"Michiel M Smeenk, Vincent van der Noort, Jeroen M A Hendrikx, Hanieh Abedian Kalkhoran, Egbert F Smit, Willemijn S M E Theelen","doi":"10.1136/jitc-2024-010065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment but come with high costs. Alternative ICI dosing strategies could reduce costs without losing efficacy. However, clinical efficacy data are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort trial, consecutive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received ≥1 cycle pembrolizumab±chemotherapy at two tertiary institutions were included. Hybrid dosed patients received either 100, 150 or 200 mg pembrolizumab every 3 weeks or double every 6 weeks depending on their weight: <65 kg, 65-90 kg or >90 kg, respectively. Standard-of-care flat dosed patients received 200 mg every 3 weeks or 400 mg every 6 weeks. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimation, compared by log-rank test and HRs were calculated with the Cox proportional hazards model in both unweighted and inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) cohorts. Non-inferiority margin was set at an HR of 1.15.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 375 patients and 391 patients were included and median follow-up was 43.1 and 61.0 months in the hybrid and flat dose cohort, respectively. OS was non-inferior in the hybrid dose cohort compared with the flat dose cohort: median 17.7 months (95% CI 14.9 to 20.9) vs 11.8 months (95% CI 9.3 to 13.8, HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.90, p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). After correcting for confounders by IPTW, OS remained non-inferior (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.91, p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). PFS in the hybrid cohort was also non-inferior to the flat dose cohort with a median of 6.4 months (95% CI 5.7 to 7.7) vs 4.6 months (95% CI 3.9 to 5.5, HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.96, p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). In total, 26.2% (or 52.5 mg per cycle, p<0.0001) pembrolizumab was saved in the hybrid dose cohort accounting to US$36 331.36 per patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective analysis of a large cohort of advanced NSCLC patients treated with pembrolizumab±chemotherapy, OS of hybrid dosed patients was non-inferior to flat dosed patients. OS remained non-inferior after correcting for possible confounding factors. This hybrid regimen resulted in significant savings of pembrolizumab and costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14820,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11804207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-010065","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment but come with high costs. Alternative ICI dosing strategies could reduce costs without losing efficacy. However, clinical efficacy data are lacking.
Methods: In this retrospective cohort trial, consecutive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received ≥1 cycle pembrolizumab±chemotherapy at two tertiary institutions were included. Hybrid dosed patients received either 100, 150 or 200 mg pembrolizumab every 3 weeks or double every 6 weeks depending on their weight: <65 kg, 65-90 kg or >90 kg, respectively. Standard-of-care flat dosed patients received 200 mg every 3 weeks or 400 mg every 6 weeks. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimation, compared by log-rank test and HRs were calculated with the Cox proportional hazards model in both unweighted and inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) cohorts. Non-inferiority margin was set at an HR of 1.15.
Results: In total, 375 patients and 391 patients were included and median follow-up was 43.1 and 61.0 months in the hybrid and flat dose cohort, respectively. OS was non-inferior in the hybrid dose cohort compared with the flat dose cohort: median 17.7 months (95% CI 14.9 to 20.9) vs 11.8 months (95% CI 9.3 to 13.8, HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.90, p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). After correcting for confounders by IPTW, OS remained non-inferior (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.91, p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). PFS in the hybrid cohort was also non-inferior to the flat dose cohort with a median of 6.4 months (95% CI 5.7 to 7.7) vs 4.6 months (95% CI 3.9 to 5.5, HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.96, p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). In total, 26.2% (or 52.5 mg per cycle, p<0.0001) pembrolizumab was saved in the hybrid dose cohort accounting to US$36 331.36 per patient.
Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis of a large cohort of advanced NSCLC patients treated with pembrolizumab±chemotherapy, OS of hybrid dosed patients was non-inferior to flat dosed patients. OS remained non-inferior after correcting for possible confounding factors. This hybrid regimen resulted in significant savings of pembrolizumab and costs.
背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)已经彻底改变了癌症治疗,但成本很高。替代ICI剂量策略可以在不失去疗效的情况下降低成本。然而,缺乏临床疗效数据。方法:在这项回顾性队列试验中,在两所高等院校连续接受≥1个周期派姆单抗±化疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者。混合剂量组患者每3周接受100mg、150 mg或200mg派姆单抗治疗,或每6周接受双倍治疗,这取决于他们的体重:分别为90kg。标准护理平剂量患者每3周服用200毫克或每6周服用400毫克。采用Kaplan-Meier估计评估总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS),采用log-rank检验进行比较,在未加权和治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)队列中使用Cox比例风险模型计算hr。非劣效性差为1.15。结果:混合剂量组和平剂量组共纳入375例患者和391例患者,中位随访时间分别为43.1个月和61.0个月。与平剂量组相比,混合剂量组的OS不差:中位17.7个月(95% CI 14.9至20.9)vs 11.8个月(95% CI 9.3至13.8,HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65至0.90)结论:在这项对接受派姆单抗±化疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者大队列的回顾性分析中,混合剂量组的OS不差于平剂量组。在校正了可能的混杂因素后,OS仍然不差。这种混合方案显著节省了派姆单抗和成本。
期刊介绍:
The Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (JITC) is a peer-reviewed publication that promotes scientific exchange and deepens knowledge in the constantly evolving fields of tumor immunology and cancer immunotherapy. With an open access format, JITC encourages widespread access to its findings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, spanning from basic science to translational and clinical research. Key areas of interest include tumor-host interactions, the intricate tumor microenvironment, animal models, the identification of predictive and prognostic immune biomarkers, groundbreaking pharmaceutical and cellular therapies, innovative vaccines, combination immune-based treatments, and the study of immune-related toxicity.