Pembrolizumab hybrid dosing is non-inferior to flat dosing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world, retrospective bicenter cohort study.

IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1136/jitc-2024-010065
Michiel M Smeenk, Vincent van der Noort, Jeroen M A Hendrikx, Hanieh Abedian Kalkhoran, Egbert F Smit, Willemijn S M E Theelen
{"title":"Pembrolizumab hybrid dosing is non-inferior to flat dosing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world, retrospective bicenter cohort study.","authors":"Michiel M Smeenk, Vincent van der Noort, Jeroen M A Hendrikx, Hanieh Abedian Kalkhoran, Egbert F Smit, Willemijn S M E Theelen","doi":"10.1136/jitc-2024-010065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment but come with high costs. Alternative ICI dosing strategies could reduce costs without losing efficacy. However, clinical efficacy data are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort trial, consecutive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received ≥1 cycle pembrolizumab±chemotherapy at two tertiary institutions were included. Hybrid dosed patients received either 100, 150 or 200 mg pembrolizumab every 3 weeks or double every 6 weeks depending on their weight: <65 kg, 65-90 kg or >90 kg, respectively. Standard-of-care flat dosed patients received 200 mg every 3 weeks or 400 mg every 6 weeks. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimation, compared by log-rank test and HRs were calculated with the Cox proportional hazards model in both unweighted and inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) cohorts. Non-inferiority margin was set at an HR of 1.15.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 375 patients and 391 patients were included and median follow-up was 43.1 and 61.0 months in the hybrid and flat dose cohort, respectively. OS was non-inferior in the hybrid dose cohort compared with the flat dose cohort: median 17.7 months (95% CI 14.9 to 20.9) vs 11.8 months (95% CI 9.3 to 13.8, HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.90, p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). After correcting for confounders by IPTW, OS remained non-inferior (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.91, p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). PFS in the hybrid cohort was also non-inferior to the flat dose cohort with a median of 6.4 months (95% CI 5.7 to 7.7) vs 4.6 months (95% CI 3.9 to 5.5, HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.96, p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). In total, 26.2% (or 52.5 mg per cycle, p<0.0001) pembrolizumab was saved in the hybrid dose cohort accounting to US$36 331.36 per patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective analysis of a large cohort of advanced NSCLC patients treated with pembrolizumab±chemotherapy, OS of hybrid dosed patients was non-inferior to flat dosed patients. OS remained non-inferior after correcting for possible confounding factors. This hybrid regimen resulted in significant savings of pembrolizumab and costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14820,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-010065","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment but come with high costs. Alternative ICI dosing strategies could reduce costs without losing efficacy. However, clinical efficacy data are lacking.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort trial, consecutive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received ≥1 cycle pembrolizumab±chemotherapy at two tertiary institutions were included. Hybrid dosed patients received either 100, 150 or 200 mg pembrolizumab every 3 weeks or double every 6 weeks depending on their weight: <65 kg, 65-90 kg or >90 kg, respectively. Standard-of-care flat dosed patients received 200 mg every 3 weeks or 400 mg every 6 weeks. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimation, compared by log-rank test and HRs were calculated with the Cox proportional hazards model in both unweighted and inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) cohorts. Non-inferiority margin was set at an HR of 1.15.

Results: In total, 375 patients and 391 patients were included and median follow-up was 43.1 and 61.0 months in the hybrid and flat dose cohort, respectively. OS was non-inferior in the hybrid dose cohort compared with the flat dose cohort: median 17.7 months (95% CI 14.9 to 20.9) vs 11.8 months (95% CI 9.3 to 13.8, HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.90, p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). After correcting for confounders by IPTW, OS remained non-inferior (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.91, p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). PFS in the hybrid cohort was also non-inferior to the flat dose cohort with a median of 6.4 months (95% CI 5.7 to 7.7) vs 4.6 months (95% CI 3.9 to 5.5, HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.96, p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). In total, 26.2% (or 52.5 mg per cycle, p<0.0001) pembrolizumab was saved in the hybrid dose cohort accounting to US$36 331.36 per patient.

Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis of a large cohort of advanced NSCLC patients treated with pembrolizumab±chemotherapy, OS of hybrid dosed patients was non-inferior to flat dosed patients. OS remained non-inferior after correcting for possible confounding factors. This hybrid regimen resulted in significant savings of pembrolizumab and costs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
4.60%
发文量
522
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (JITC) is a peer-reviewed publication that promotes scientific exchange and deepens knowledge in the constantly evolving fields of tumor immunology and cancer immunotherapy. With an open access format, JITC encourages widespread access to its findings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, spanning from basic science to translational and clinical research. Key areas of interest include tumor-host interactions, the intricate tumor microenvironment, animal models, the identification of predictive and prognostic immune biomarkers, groundbreaking pharmaceutical and cellular therapies, innovative vaccines, combination immune-based treatments, and the study of immune-related toxicity.
期刊最新文献
Pembrolizumab hybrid dosing is non-inferior to flat dosing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world, retrospective bicenter cohort study. Phase I study of efineptakin alfa (NT-I7) for the treatment of Kaposi sarcoma. Reinforcing cancer immunotherapy with engineered porous hollow mycobacterium tuberculosis loaded with tumor neoantigens. Single-chain variable fragment affinity tuning can optimize anti-AML CAR-NK cell functionality. Targeting IL-33 in patients with cancer under immune checkpoint inhibitors for a better antitumor response and prevent thromboembolism?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1