Pembrolizumab hybrid dosing is non-inferior to flat dosing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world, retrospective bicenter cohort study.

IF 10.6 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1136/jitc-2024-010065
Michiel M Smeenk, Vincent van der Noort, Jeroen M A Hendrikx, Hanieh Abedian Kalkhoran, Egbert F Smit, Willemijn S M E Theelen
{"title":"Pembrolizumab hybrid dosing is non-inferior to flat dosing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world, retrospective bicenter cohort study.","authors":"Michiel M Smeenk, Vincent van der Noort, Jeroen M A Hendrikx, Hanieh Abedian Kalkhoran, Egbert F Smit, Willemijn S M E Theelen","doi":"10.1136/jitc-2024-010065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment but come with high costs. Alternative ICI dosing strategies could reduce costs without losing efficacy. However, clinical efficacy data are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort trial, consecutive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received ≥1 cycle pembrolizumab±chemotherapy at two tertiary institutions were included. Hybrid dosed patients received either 100, 150 or 200 mg pembrolizumab every 3 weeks or double every 6 weeks depending on their weight: <65 kg, 65-90 kg or >90 kg, respectively. Standard-of-care flat dosed patients received 200 mg every 3 weeks or 400 mg every 6 weeks. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimation, compared by log-rank test and HRs were calculated with the Cox proportional hazards model in both unweighted and inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) cohorts. Non-inferiority margin was set at an HR of 1.15.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 375 patients and 391 patients were included and median follow-up was 43.1 and 61.0 months in the hybrid and flat dose cohort, respectively. OS was non-inferior in the hybrid dose cohort compared with the flat dose cohort: median 17.7 months (95% CI 14.9 to 20.9) vs 11.8 months (95% CI 9.3 to 13.8, HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.90, p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). After correcting for confounders by IPTW, OS remained non-inferior (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.91, p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). PFS in the hybrid cohort was also non-inferior to the flat dose cohort with a median of 6.4 months (95% CI 5.7 to 7.7) vs 4.6 months (95% CI 3.9 to 5.5, HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.96, p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). In total, 26.2% (or 52.5 mg per cycle, p<0.0001) pembrolizumab was saved in the hybrid dose cohort accounting to US$36 331.36 per patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective analysis of a large cohort of advanced NSCLC patients treated with pembrolizumab±chemotherapy, OS of hybrid dosed patients was non-inferior to flat dosed patients. OS remained non-inferior after correcting for possible confounding factors. This hybrid regimen resulted in significant savings of pembrolizumab and costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14820,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11804207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-010065","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment but come with high costs. Alternative ICI dosing strategies could reduce costs without losing efficacy. However, clinical efficacy data are lacking.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort trial, consecutive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received ≥1 cycle pembrolizumab±chemotherapy at two tertiary institutions were included. Hybrid dosed patients received either 100, 150 or 200 mg pembrolizumab every 3 weeks or double every 6 weeks depending on their weight: <65 kg, 65-90 kg or >90 kg, respectively. Standard-of-care flat dosed patients received 200 mg every 3 weeks or 400 mg every 6 weeks. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimation, compared by log-rank test and HRs were calculated with the Cox proportional hazards model in both unweighted and inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) cohorts. Non-inferiority margin was set at an HR of 1.15.

Results: In total, 375 patients and 391 patients were included and median follow-up was 43.1 and 61.0 months in the hybrid and flat dose cohort, respectively. OS was non-inferior in the hybrid dose cohort compared with the flat dose cohort: median 17.7 months (95% CI 14.9 to 20.9) vs 11.8 months (95% CI 9.3 to 13.8, HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.90, p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). After correcting for confounders by IPTW, OS remained non-inferior (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.91, p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). PFS in the hybrid cohort was also non-inferior to the flat dose cohort with a median of 6.4 months (95% CI 5.7 to 7.7) vs 4.6 months (95% CI 3.9 to 5.5, HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.96, p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). In total, 26.2% (or 52.5 mg per cycle, p<0.0001) pembrolizumab was saved in the hybrid dose cohort accounting to US$36 331.36 per patient.

Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis of a large cohort of advanced NSCLC patients treated with pembrolizumab±chemotherapy, OS of hybrid dosed patients was non-inferior to flat dosed patients. OS remained non-inferior after correcting for possible confounding factors. This hybrid regimen resulted in significant savings of pembrolizumab and costs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pembrolizumab混合剂量治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌不低于单一剂量:一项真实世界的回顾性双中心队列研究。
背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)已经彻底改变了癌症治疗,但成本很高。替代ICI剂量策略可以在不失去疗效的情况下降低成本。然而,缺乏临床疗效数据。方法:在这项回顾性队列试验中,在两所高等院校连续接受≥1个周期派姆单抗±化疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者。混合剂量组患者每3周接受100mg、150 mg或200mg派姆单抗治疗,或每6周接受双倍治疗,这取决于他们的体重:分别为90kg。标准护理平剂量患者每3周服用200毫克或每6周服用400毫克。采用Kaplan-Meier估计评估总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS),采用log-rank检验进行比较,在未加权和治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)队列中使用Cox比例风险模型计算hr。非劣效性差为1.15。结果:混合剂量组和平剂量组共纳入375例患者和391例患者,中位随访时间分别为43.1个月和61.0个月。与平剂量组相比,混合剂量组的OS不差:中位17.7个月(95% CI 14.9至20.9)vs 11.8个月(95% CI 9.3至13.8,HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65至0.90)结论:在这项对接受派姆单抗±化疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者大队列的回顾性分析中,混合剂量组的OS不差于平剂量组。在校正了可能的混杂因素后,OS仍然不差。这种混合方案显著节省了派姆单抗和成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
4.60%
发文量
522
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (JITC) is a peer-reviewed publication that promotes scientific exchange and deepens knowledge in the constantly evolving fields of tumor immunology and cancer immunotherapy. With an open access format, JITC encourages widespread access to its findings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, spanning from basic science to translational and clinical research. Key areas of interest include tumor-host interactions, the intricate tumor microenvironment, animal models, the identification of predictive and prognostic immune biomarkers, groundbreaking pharmaceutical and cellular therapies, innovative vaccines, combination immune-based treatments, and the study of immune-related toxicity.
期刊最新文献
Role of solute carrier family 7 member 7 in cancer: opportunities for tumor microenvironment research. Phase Ib multicenter study of anti-TIM-3 (S095018/Sym023) in combination with anti-PD-1 (Sym021) in patients with advanced/metastatic recurrent biliary tract cancer. CD79A/CD40 intracellular domain uses a 4-1BB-like metabolic pathway driven by cholesterol biosynthesis. Dual regulation of CXCR6+CD8+ T cells modulates cytotoxic and exhaustion-associated programs during prostate cancer progression. Complement system in cancer: friend or foe of immunotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1