Breaking through the 'wall of complexity' in a politically themed microworld: a challenge for elected officials and the general public.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Cognitive Processing Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1007/s10339-025-01257-w
Benoît Béchard, Helen M Hodgetts, Gabrielle Teyssier-Roberge, Frédéric Morneau-Guérin, Mathieu Ouimet, Sébastien Tremblay
{"title":"Breaking through the 'wall of complexity' in a politically themed microworld: a challenge for elected officials and the general public.","authors":"Benoît Béchard, Helen M Hodgetts, Gabrielle Teyssier-Roberge, Frédéric Morneau-Guérin, Mathieu Ouimet, Sébastien Tremblay","doi":"10.1007/s10339-025-01257-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Political leaders are often regarded as the most qualified individuals to address modern societal challenges, owing to the knowledge they acquire through their experience in dealing with complex issues, governance and management, and working towards making impactful decisions. To understand the influence of prior knowledge on decision-making, we conducted a comparative analysis of complex decision-making performance in a politically themed computer-simulated microworld involving incumbent elected officials and a general population sample, each contrasted with a random-response baseline produced with randomly generated decisions. Participants were tasked to govern a country for re-election while maintaining financial stability. The pattern of results suggests that decision-making faces a 'wall of complexity' whether one is an elected official or a citizen. Although elected officials generally reported having greater political knowledge, their performance was still relatively poor. The elected officials and general population subgroups performed at the same level and only slightly better than chance. Addressing the societal challenges of our time requires elected officials to possess more than domain-specific prior knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":47638,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Processing","volume":" ","pages":"689-706"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Processing","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-025-01257-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Political leaders are often regarded as the most qualified individuals to address modern societal challenges, owing to the knowledge they acquire through their experience in dealing with complex issues, governance and management, and working towards making impactful decisions. To understand the influence of prior knowledge on decision-making, we conducted a comparative analysis of complex decision-making performance in a politically themed computer-simulated microworld involving incumbent elected officials and a general population sample, each contrasted with a random-response baseline produced with randomly generated decisions. Participants were tasked to govern a country for re-election while maintaining financial stability. The pattern of results suggests that decision-making faces a 'wall of complexity' whether one is an elected official or a citizen. Although elected officials generally reported having greater political knowledge, their performance was still relatively poor. The elected officials and general population subgroups performed at the same level and only slightly better than chance. Addressing the societal challenges of our time requires elected officials to possess more than domain-specific prior knowledge.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在以政治为主题的微观世界中突破“复杂之墙”:对民选官员和公众的挑战。
政治领导人通常被认为是最有资格应对现代社会挑战的人,因为他们通过处理复杂问题、治理和管理以及努力做出有影响力的决策的经验获得了知识。为了理解先验知识对决策的影响,我们在一个以政治为主题的计算机模拟微观世界中对复杂的决策绩效进行了比较分析,该微观世界涉及在任民选官员和普通人群样本,并与随机生成决策产生的随机响应基线进行了对比。参与者的任务是在维持金融稳定的同时管理一个国家进行连任。结果的模式表明,无论是民选官员还是公民,决策都面临着“复杂之墙”。虽然当选官员普遍报告说他们有更多的政治知识,但他们的表现仍然相对较差。当选官员和一般人口小组的表现相同,仅略好于偶然。解决我们这个时代的社会挑战需要民选官员拥有的不仅仅是特定领域的先验知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Processing
Cognitive Processing PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Cognitive Processing - International Quarterly of Cognitive Science is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes innovative contributions in the multidisciplinary field of cognitive science.  Its main purpose is to stimulate research and scientific interaction through communication between specialists in different fields on topics of common interest and to promote an interdisciplinary understanding of the diverse topics in contemporary cognitive science. Cognitive Processing is articulated in the following sections:Cognitive DevelopmentCognitive Models of Risk and Decision MakingCognitive NeuroscienceCognitive PsychologyComputational Cognitive SciencesPhilosophy of MindNeuroimaging and Electrophysiological MethodsPsycholinguistics and Computational linguisticsQuantitative Psychology and Formal Theories in Cognitive ScienceSocial Cognition and Cognitive Science of Culture
期刊最新文献
The semantic interplay of semantic radicals and host phonograms in chinese transparent character processing. The mediating role of persistence in the relationship between metacognitive awareness and lifelong learning. Perceiving the uncertain: predictive coding and individual differences in the dynamics of multistable perception. Investigating dual-pathway cognitive and affective processes in visual metaphor advertising: the roles of consumer involvement and metaphor type. Effects of collaboration on the foreign language side effect: evidence from Chinese international students using a dual-task paradigm.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1