Impact of COVID-19 in the in-hospital cardiac arrest activations: Retrospective study.

Ghali Ballout, Marta Magaldi Mendaña, Bartomeu Ramis Bou, Cristian Torres Quevedo, Adriana Capdevila Freixas, Silvia Moreno-Jurico, Enrique Jesús Carrero Cardenal, Jaime Fontanals Dotras
{"title":"Impact of COVID-19 in the in-hospital cardiac arrest activations: Retrospective study.","authors":"Ghali Ballout, Marta Magaldi Mendaña, Bartomeu Ramis Bou, Cristian Torres Quevedo, Adriana Capdevila Freixas, Silvia Moreno-Jurico, Enrique Jesús Carrero Cardenal, Jaime Fontanals Dotras","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2025.502137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze whether the characteristics of the patients treated by the in-hospital cardiorespiratory arrest team, IHCA and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were different in the period before the COVID-19 compared to the pandemic period; also analyzing the differences between COVID+ and COVID- patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational and retrospective study from January 1st, 2018, to December 31st, 2021.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>All adult patients over 18 years old requiring attention from the IHCA response team.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>CPR maneuvers according to the advanced life support guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council published in 2015, as well as the modifications made in the COVID era (2020).</p><p><strong>Main variables: </strong>Demographic and epidemiological data, activations of the IHCA response team, CA data, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, survival and neurological outcome at hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 368 patients were analyzed: 173 in the pre-pandemic group and 195 in the pandemic group. The neurological outcome was better in the pre-pandemic group, and COVID+ patients had a longer ICU length of stay. However, no differences in the response time of the CPR team or in CPR duration were found, nor in immediate survival or at hospital discharge, between both groups or between COVID+ and COVID- patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Changes in CPR care protocols due to the COVID-19 pandemia did not seem to affect response times from IHCA team neither immediate nor discharge survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":" ","pages":"502137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2025.502137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze whether the characteristics of the patients treated by the in-hospital cardiorespiratory arrest team, IHCA and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were different in the period before the COVID-19 compared to the pandemic period; also analyzing the differences between COVID+ and COVID- patients.

Design: Observational and retrospective study from January 1st, 2018, to December 31st, 2021.

Setting: Tertiary hospital.

Patients: All adult patients over 18 years old requiring attention from the IHCA response team.

Interventions: CPR maneuvers according to the advanced life support guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council published in 2015, as well as the modifications made in the COVID era (2020).

Main variables: Demographic and epidemiological data, activations of the IHCA response team, CA data, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, survival and neurological outcome at hospital discharge.

Results: A total of 368 patients were analyzed: 173 in the pre-pandemic group and 195 in the pandemic group. The neurological outcome was better in the pre-pandemic group, and COVID+ patients had a longer ICU length of stay. However, no differences in the response time of the CPR team or in CPR duration were found, nor in immediate survival or at hospital discharge, between both groups or between COVID+ and COVID- patients.

Conclusions: Changes in CPR care protocols due to the COVID-19 pandemia did not seem to affect response times from IHCA team neither immediate nor discharge survival.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of training models as a method to improve the acquisition of skills in Intensive Care Medicine. Ineffective respiratory efforts and their potential consequences during mechanical ventilation. Impact of COVID-19 in the in-hospital cardiac arrest activations: Retrospective study. Quality of causality assessment among observational studies in intensive care: A methodological review. Did intubation procedures for critically ill patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection change during the pandemic? Secondary analysis of the INTUPROS multicenter study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1