A Bayesian-based approach for constitutive model selection and calibration using diverse material responses

IF 9.3 1区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Acta Materialia Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2025.120796
Bekassyl Battalgazy , Danial Khatamsaz , Zahra Ghasemi , Debjoy D. Mallick , Raymundo Arroyave , Ankit Srivastava
{"title":"A Bayesian-based approach for constitutive model selection and calibration using diverse material responses","authors":"Bekassyl Battalgazy ,&nbsp;Danial Khatamsaz ,&nbsp;Zahra Ghasemi ,&nbsp;Debjoy D. Mallick ,&nbsp;Raymundo Arroyave ,&nbsp;Ankit Srivastava","doi":"10.1016/j.actamat.2025.120796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Constitutive models are essential for analyzing the structural performance of materials under complex loading conditions. However, multiple models with different sets of values of the parameters can describe a particular mechanical response of a material. Thus, treating model selection and parameter calibration separately and relying on a single mechanical response may lead to inaccuracies. Herein, we present a Bayesian-based approach that integrates model selection and calibration into a single-step process while concurrently evaluating multiple mechanical responses. We focus on constitutive models that include both strain and strain-rate hardening and evaluate both indentation and uniaxial tensile responses. Finite element simulations, combined with Gaussian process regressors, are employed to efficiently explore the multidimensional parameter space of all models and their resultant responses. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, we first use computationally generated responses of a known model-parameter combination as reference and compare it with the predicted model-parameter combination. We then apply the approach to experimental data, for which the model-parameter combination is unknown, and validate predictions by assessing a mechanical response not used for model selection and calibration. This validation highlights the robustness and predictive capability of our approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":238,"journal":{"name":"Acta Materialia","volume":"287 ","pages":"Article 120796"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Materialia","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359645425000886","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Constitutive models are essential for analyzing the structural performance of materials under complex loading conditions. However, multiple models with different sets of values of the parameters can describe a particular mechanical response of a material. Thus, treating model selection and parameter calibration separately and relying on a single mechanical response may lead to inaccuracies. Herein, we present a Bayesian-based approach that integrates model selection and calibration into a single-step process while concurrently evaluating multiple mechanical responses. We focus on constitutive models that include both strain and strain-rate hardening and evaluate both indentation and uniaxial tensile responses. Finite element simulations, combined with Gaussian process regressors, are employed to efficiently explore the multidimensional parameter space of all models and their resultant responses. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, we first use computationally generated responses of a known model-parameter combination as reference and compare it with the predicted model-parameter combination. We then apply the approach to experimental data, for which the model-parameter combination is unknown, and validate predictions by assessing a mechanical response not used for model selection and calibration. This validation highlights the robustness and predictive capability of our approach.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于贝叶斯方法的本构模型选择和校准使用不同的材料响应
本构模型是分析复杂载荷条件下材料结构性能的基础。然而,具有不同参数值集的多个模型可以描述材料的特定力学响应。因此,将模型选择和参数校准分开处理并依赖单一的机械响应可能导致不准确。在此,我们提出了一种基于贝叶斯的方法,该方法将模型选择和校准集成到一个单步过程中,同时评估多个力学响应。我们专注于本构模型,包括应变和应变率硬化,并评估压痕和单轴拉伸响应。采用有限元模拟,结合高斯过程回归,有效地探索了所有模型的多维参数空间及其产生的响应。为了证明所提出方法的有效性,我们首先使用已知模型-参数组合的计算生成响应作为参考,并将其与预测的模型-参数组合进行比较。然后,我们将该方法应用于模型参数组合未知的实验数据,并通过评估未用于模型选择和校准的机械响应来验证预测。这一验证突出了我们的方法的鲁棒性和预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Materialia
Acta Materialia 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
8.50%
发文量
801
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Acta Materialia serves as a platform for publishing full-length, original papers and commissioned overviews that contribute to a profound understanding of the correlation between the processing, structure, and properties of inorganic materials. The journal seeks papers with high impact potential or those that significantly propel the field forward. The scope includes the atomic and molecular arrangements, chemical and electronic structures, and microstructure of materials, focusing on their mechanical or functional behavior across all length scales, including nanostructures.
期刊最新文献
Cooperative structural dynamics in the intermediate relaxation regime between β and α in borosilicate glass Corrigendum to “Stress-induced amorphization promotes grain boundary sliding in olivine” [Acta Materialia 303 (2026) 121697] Fracture-resistant ZrN-SS316L graded cermet composite design using finite element simulations and experimental validation Modulating Li-ion flux by heterointerphase charge reconstruction toward dendritic-free, high-voltage lithium metal batteries Corrosion-Resistant Coatings in Molten Salts Suggested by Computational Phase-Stability Diagrams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1