Balancing on carbon storage and ecological security in urban areas: The case of Dongguan city, China

IF 4.9 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Sustainable Futures Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100468
Xinyi Wang , Fenzhen Su , Fengqin Yan , Vincent Lyne , Yikun Cui , Bin He , Rong Fan
{"title":"Balancing on carbon storage and ecological security in urban areas: The case of Dongguan city, China","authors":"Xinyi Wang ,&nbsp;Fenzhen Su ,&nbsp;Fengqin Yan ,&nbsp;Vincent Lyne ,&nbsp;Yikun Cui ,&nbsp;Bin He ,&nbsp;Rong Fan","doi":"10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Land-use changes from rapid coastal urban expansion fragments ecosystems and reduces carbon storage. Current and future national urban policies must therefore enhance carbon sink functions of ecosystems while maintaining spatial ecological structure networks. Here, we assessed current policies against future scenarios using systems thinking and land-use change simulation coupled to carbon-storage accounting. Three future scenarios for Dongguan City across ecological Natural Evolution Scenario, economic Economic Priority Scenario and balanced Harmonious Development Scenario show latter partly controls carbon loss through more robust ecological networks. However, by 2030, all scenarios show construction land expanding sharply across cultivated land and grassland, and carbon storage declines. Future urban expansion therefore seriously challenges effectiveness of current spatial policies which must be enhanced for future low carbon urban developments and protection of associated ecosystem connectivities. This study analyzed the maintenance of habitat connectivity and carbon storage under different development policies during urbanization and discussed the significance of policies in maintaining the stability of urban ecological networks. With this effort, a new perspective on the maintenance of ecological security patterns is provided, serving as a fundamental reference for future urban planning decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34478,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Futures","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100468"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Futures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188825000383","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Land-use changes from rapid coastal urban expansion fragments ecosystems and reduces carbon storage. Current and future national urban policies must therefore enhance carbon sink functions of ecosystems while maintaining spatial ecological structure networks. Here, we assessed current policies against future scenarios using systems thinking and land-use change simulation coupled to carbon-storage accounting. Three future scenarios for Dongguan City across ecological Natural Evolution Scenario, economic Economic Priority Scenario and balanced Harmonious Development Scenario show latter partly controls carbon loss through more robust ecological networks. However, by 2030, all scenarios show construction land expanding sharply across cultivated land and grassland, and carbon storage declines. Future urban expansion therefore seriously challenges effectiveness of current spatial policies which must be enhanced for future low carbon urban developments and protection of associated ecosystem connectivities. This study analyzed the maintenance of habitat connectivity and carbon storage under different development policies during urbanization and discussed the significance of policies in maintaining the stability of urban ecological networks. With this effort, a new perspective on the maintenance of ecological security patterns is provided, serving as a fundamental reference for future urban planning decisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市碳储量与生态安全的平衡——以东莞市为例
沿海城市快速扩张带来的土地利用变化破坏了生态系统,减少了碳储量。因此,当前和未来的国家城市政策必须在保持空间生态结构网络的同时增强生态系统的碳汇功能。在这里,我们利用系统思维和土地利用变化模拟与碳储存核算相结合,评估了当前政策与未来情景的对比。生态型自然进化情景、经济型经济优先情景和平衡型和谐发展情景表明,平衡型和谐发展情景通过更强健的生态网络控制碳损失。然而,到2030年,所有情景都显示建设用地在耕地和草地上急剧扩大,碳储量下降。因此,未来的城市扩张严重挑战了当前空间政策的有效性,这些政策必须得到加强,以实现未来的低碳城市发展和保护相关生态系统的连通性。本研究分析了城市化过程中不同发展政策对栖息地连通性和碳储量的维持,探讨了政策对维持城市生态网络稳定性的意义。通过这一努力,提供了维持生态安全格局的新视角,为未来的城市规划决策提供了基本参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Futures
Sustainable Futures Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Futures: is a journal focused on the intersection of sustainability, environment and technology from various disciplines in social sciences, and their larger implications for corporation, government, education institutions, regions and society both at present and in the future. It provides an advanced platform for studies related to sustainability and sustainable development in society, economics, environment, and culture. The scope of the journal is broad and encourages interdisciplinary research, as well as welcoming theoretical and practical research from all methodological approaches.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the impact of climate change anxiety and social media information overload on unusual purchase behavior Why direct payments are more effective for combatting poverty than fair prices Exploring the role of media in climate change awareness and adaptation among university students in Islamabad, Pakistan Sustainable leather processing: A critical review of emerging green technologies and practices The impact mechanism of ESG ratings on firm value: An empirical study based on the multi-period difference-in-differences approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1