Ernesto M Buccheri, Giuseppe Lanzano, Amedeo Villanucci, Patrick Mallucci, Giovanni Bistoni, Moustapha Hamdi
{"title":"Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) Scaffold (GalaFLEX) in Mastopexy for Breast Ptosis: A Prospective Study.","authors":"Ernesto M Buccheri, Giuseppe Lanzano, Amedeo Villanucci, Patrick Mallucci, Giovanni Bistoni, Moustapha Hamdi","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-04663-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast mastopexy poses unique challenges in achieving long-term results, particularly regarding the recurrence of ptosis. For this reason, different surgical techniques have been proposed, including those involving the use of additional devices at the lower pole to provide better support for the mammary gland. To address this issue, we conducted a prospective analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of incorporating the bioabsorbable scaffold GalaFLEX with mastopexy procedure in preventing recurrent ptosis during a 12-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study enrolled 60 patients undergoing primary mastopexy for correcting grade III breast ptosis. The cohort was divided into two groups (A and B). Group A underwent mastopexy with the addition of the bioabsorbable mesh sling to the lower pole of the breast, serving as an internal, subcutaneous supportive \"bra\". Group B received a standard mastopexy without the mesh support. Patients were followed up for 12 months to assess the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The nipple-to-inframammary fold distance was measured before the surgery and during the 1-month and 12-month follow-up checks between the study group (Group A) and the control group (Group B) as indicator of post-operative breast ptosis recurrence. From the 12th post-operative month onward, measurements in Group A showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) compared to Group B, indicating a better maintenance of the long-term results in patients treated with GalaFLEX.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incorporation of GalaFLEX matrix in mastopexy procedures provided an additional layer of support and demonstrated efficacy in delaying the reoccurrence of ptosis following surgery. This study confirmed the potential benefits of using a bioabsorbable mesh in mastopexy procedures to enhance long-term breast shape stability, offering to the plastic surgeons a valuable adjunct in the management of breast ptosis.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iii: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-04663-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Breast mastopexy poses unique challenges in achieving long-term results, particularly regarding the recurrence of ptosis. For this reason, different surgical techniques have been proposed, including those involving the use of additional devices at the lower pole to provide better support for the mammary gland. To address this issue, we conducted a prospective analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of incorporating the bioabsorbable scaffold GalaFLEX with mastopexy procedure in preventing recurrent ptosis during a 12-month follow-up period.
Methods: The study enrolled 60 patients undergoing primary mastopexy for correcting grade III breast ptosis. The cohort was divided into two groups (A and B). Group A underwent mastopexy with the addition of the bioabsorbable mesh sling to the lower pole of the breast, serving as an internal, subcutaneous supportive "bra". Group B received a standard mastopexy without the mesh support. Patients were followed up for 12 months to assess the outcomes.
Results: The nipple-to-inframammary fold distance was measured before the surgery and during the 1-month and 12-month follow-up checks between the study group (Group A) and the control group (Group B) as indicator of post-operative breast ptosis recurrence. From the 12th post-operative month onward, measurements in Group A showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) compared to Group B, indicating a better maintenance of the long-term results in patients treated with GalaFLEX.
Conclusion: The incorporation of GalaFLEX matrix in mastopexy procedures provided an additional layer of support and demonstrated efficacy in delaying the reoccurrence of ptosis following surgery. This study confirmed the potential benefits of using a bioabsorbable mesh in mastopexy procedures to enhance long-term breast shape stability, offering to the plastic surgeons a valuable adjunct in the management of breast ptosis.
Level of evidence iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP).
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.