Emily L Robson, Karen A Kidd, Evlyn K Sun, Patricia L Gillis, Ryan S Prosser
{"title":"Spatial patterns of microplastics in freshwater bivalves (Bivalvia: Unionidae and Sphaeriidae) relative to municipal wastewater effluent discharges.","authors":"Emily L Robson, Karen A Kidd, Evlyn K Sun, Patricia L Gillis, Ryan S Prosser","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgae044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Microplastics are discharged by municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs); however, their uptake by filter-feeding freshwater bivalves is poorly understood. This study examined the abundance and characteristics of microplastics in wild bivalves from five locations along a 155 km stretch of the Grand River (Ontario, Canada) in 2021-2022, including upstream and downstream of three municipal WWTPs. At each site, fingernail clams (Sphaeriidae spp., n = 5 composites), freshwater mussels (Lasmigona costata, n = 10; gill, digestive gland, and hemolymph), and surface water (n = 3) were sampled at a single timepoint. Microplastics (particles >38 μm to 5 mm) were isolated and visualized via stereomicroscopy, and a subset chemically analyzed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Fingernail clams contained the highest total blank corrected microparticle counts (35.5 ± 29.4 g-1 [mean ± SD]), mussel tissues ranged from 4.3 ± 4.2 mL-1 in hemolymph to 6.5 ± 8.1 g-1 in digestive gland, and water contained 5.5 ± 2.8 L-1. Fibers were the dominant morphology across all samples, most particles were between 80 μm and 2 mm in length and, of those analyzed chemically, 30.0% were a plastic polymer. At sites downstream of WWTP outfalls, elevated counts were only seen in mussel gills and not in other bivalve tissues or water compared with upstream samples. Although microplastics were found across all sites in both biotic and abiotic compartments, results suggest little impact of WWTP discharges on their uptake in downstream bivalves.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":"44 2","pages":"508-523"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgae044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Microplastics are discharged by municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs); however, their uptake by filter-feeding freshwater bivalves is poorly understood. This study examined the abundance and characteristics of microplastics in wild bivalves from five locations along a 155 km stretch of the Grand River (Ontario, Canada) in 2021-2022, including upstream and downstream of three municipal WWTPs. At each site, fingernail clams (Sphaeriidae spp., n = 5 composites), freshwater mussels (Lasmigona costata, n = 10; gill, digestive gland, and hemolymph), and surface water (n = 3) were sampled at a single timepoint. Microplastics (particles >38 μm to 5 mm) were isolated and visualized via stereomicroscopy, and a subset chemically analyzed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Fingernail clams contained the highest total blank corrected microparticle counts (35.5 ± 29.4 g-1 [mean ± SD]), mussel tissues ranged from 4.3 ± 4.2 mL-1 in hemolymph to 6.5 ± 8.1 g-1 in digestive gland, and water contained 5.5 ± 2.8 L-1. Fibers were the dominant morphology across all samples, most particles were between 80 μm and 2 mm in length and, of those analyzed chemically, 30.0% were a plastic polymer. At sites downstream of WWTP outfalls, elevated counts were only seen in mussel gills and not in other bivalve tissues or water compared with upstream samples. Although microplastics were found across all sites in both biotic and abiotic compartments, results suggest little impact of WWTP discharges on their uptake in downstream bivalves.
期刊介绍:
The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...]
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.