Adverse drug event profile of pharmacotherapies for alcohol use disorder: a retrospective pharmacovigilance disproportionality analysis study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2025.2464896
Kannan Sridharan
{"title":"Adverse drug event profile of pharmacotherapies for alcohol use disorder: a retrospective pharmacovigilance disproportionality analysis study.","authors":"Kannan Sridharan","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2464896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) significantly affects global health, leading to physical deterioration and impacting personal and social relationships. This study aims to evaluate the adverse event profiles (AEP) of three USFDA-approved medications for AUD, acamprosate, disulfiram, and naltrexone, using data from the USFDA Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS).</p><p><strong>Research designs and methods: </strong>Reports related to acamprosate, disulfiram, and naltrexone from March 2004 to March 2024 were extracted from the USFDA AERS database. Data were verified, and disproportionality analysis was conducted using frequentist and Bayesian methods. Adverse events were assessed based on reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, and Bayesian measures. Outcomes such as death, life-threatening events, and hospitalization were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19,177 unique reports were analyzed (naltrexone: <i>n</i> = 18,544; acamprosate: <i>n</i> = 249; disulfiram: <i>n</i> = 384). Common adverse events included hepatobiliary, nervous system, and psychiatric disorders. Disulfiram was associated with coagulopathy and drug interactions, while naltrexone was linked to injection site reactions and hypersensitivity. Naltrexone had higher mortality reports, and disulfiram had more hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study underscores the diverse AEPs of these medications, highlighting the need for careful monitoring and individualized treatment to ensure safety and efficacy in managing AUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2464896","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) significantly affects global health, leading to physical deterioration and impacting personal and social relationships. This study aims to evaluate the adverse event profiles (AEP) of three USFDA-approved medications for AUD, acamprosate, disulfiram, and naltrexone, using data from the USFDA Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS).

Research designs and methods: Reports related to acamprosate, disulfiram, and naltrexone from March 2004 to March 2024 were extracted from the USFDA AERS database. Data were verified, and disproportionality analysis was conducted using frequentist and Bayesian methods. Adverse events were assessed based on reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, and Bayesian measures. Outcomes such as death, life-threatening events, and hospitalization were also analyzed.

Results: A total of 19,177 unique reports were analyzed (naltrexone: n = 18,544; acamprosate: n = 249; disulfiram: n = 384). Common adverse events included hepatobiliary, nervous system, and psychiatric disorders. Disulfiram was associated with coagulopathy and drug interactions, while naltrexone was linked to injection site reactions and hypersensitivity. Naltrexone had higher mortality reports, and disulfiram had more hospitalizations.

Conclusion: The study underscores the diverse AEPs of these medications, highlighting the need for careful monitoring and individualized treatment to ensure safety and efficacy in managing AUD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
酒精使用障碍药物治疗的不良药物事件概况:一项回顾性药物警戒歧化分析研究。
背景:酒精使用障碍(AUD)严重影响全球健康,导致身体恶化并影响个人和社会关系。本研究旨在利用美国fda不良事件报告系统(AERS)的数据,评估美国fda批准的三种治疗AUD的药物——阿坎普罗酸、双硫仑和纳曲酮的不良事件概况(AEP)。研究设计和方法:从USFDA AERS数据库中提取2004年3月至2024年3月有关阿坎普罗酸、双硫仑和纳曲酮的报告。对数据进行验证,并使用频率分析和贝叶斯方法进行歧化分析。不良反应的评估基于报告优势比、比例报告比和贝叶斯测量。还分析了死亡、危及生命的事件和住院等结果。结果:共分析了19,177份独特报告(纳曲酮:n = 18,544;Acamprosate: n = 249;双硫仑:n = 384)。常见的不良反应包括肝胆、神经系统和精神疾病。双硫仑与凝血功能障碍和药物相互作用有关,而纳曲酮与注射部位反应和过敏有关。纳曲酮的死亡率更高,而双硫仑的住院率更高。结论:该研究强调了这些药物的不同aep,强调了仔细监测和个性化治疗的必要性,以确保治疗AUD的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
期刊最新文献
Insights gained from drug utilization research to improve safe clinical practice for children and adolescents in Denmark. GLP-1-derived therapies and risk of sarcopenia: myth or reality? Cardiorenometabolic medicine as a new subspecialty in the light of novel pharmaceuticals with dual or triple benefits. Lessons from examining the safety of drugs for COVID-19 during pregnancy. Who is missing from SGLT-2 inhibitor trials? Implications for drug safety and generalizability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1