Association between combined oral contraceptive prescription and cervical artery dissection: A retrospective cohort study

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Thrombosis research Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2025.109279
Robert J. Trager , Catherine P. Haering , Anthony N. Baumann , Debbie S. Wright
{"title":"Association between combined oral contraceptive prescription and cervical artery dissection: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Robert J. Trager ,&nbsp;Catherine P. Haering ,&nbsp;Anthony N. Baumann ,&nbsp;Debbie S. Wright","doi":"10.1016/j.thromres.2025.109279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To date, research has identified positive associations between combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and adverse vascular events, however, evidence regarding the possible association with cervical artery dissection (CeAD) remains limited. We tested the hypothesis of a positive association between COCs and CeAD within one year following COC initiation compared to matched controls initiating intrauterine devices (IUDs), as measured by risk ratio (RR).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We queried de-identified United States health records data (TriNetX, Inc.) from 2014 to 2024 for females aged 15–50 years without previous cerebrovascular disease or CeAD, creating mutually exclusive cohorts initiating either COCs or IUDs. We used propensity matching to control for variables associated with CeAD. Our primary outcome included the RR for CeAD within one year follow-up. We secondarily explored cumulative CeAD incidence and RR of stroke, also examining outcomes for females with ≥2 COC prescriptions (COC2).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After matching there were 214,020 patients per cohort (mean age 31 years). The incidence and risk of CeAD was greater among those prescribed COCs compared to matched controls with IUDs [95 % CI] (COCs: 0.016 %, IUDs: 0.008 %; RR 1.94 [1.10,3.43]; <em>P</em> = 0.0195). A similar association was observed for stroke (COCs: 0.106 %, IUDs: 0.057 %; RR = 1.86 [1.49,2.32]; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). The secondary COC2 analysis revealed similar findings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The present findings suggest that females prescribed COCs have an increased risk of CeAD and stroke compared to matched controls using IUDs. These observations should be viewed as preliminary, require corroboration by other studies, and in isolation do not replace the broader clinical and shared decision-making regarding contraceptive use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23064,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis research","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 109279"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049384825000283","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To date, research has identified positive associations between combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and adverse vascular events, however, evidence regarding the possible association with cervical artery dissection (CeAD) remains limited. We tested the hypothesis of a positive association between COCs and CeAD within one year following COC initiation compared to matched controls initiating intrauterine devices (IUDs), as measured by risk ratio (RR).

Methods

We queried de-identified United States health records data (TriNetX, Inc.) from 2014 to 2024 for females aged 15–50 years without previous cerebrovascular disease or CeAD, creating mutually exclusive cohorts initiating either COCs or IUDs. We used propensity matching to control for variables associated with CeAD. Our primary outcome included the RR for CeAD within one year follow-up. We secondarily explored cumulative CeAD incidence and RR of stroke, also examining outcomes for females with ≥2 COC prescriptions (COC2).

Results

After matching there were 214,020 patients per cohort (mean age 31 years). The incidence and risk of CeAD was greater among those prescribed COCs compared to matched controls with IUDs [95 % CI] (COCs: 0.016 %, IUDs: 0.008 %; RR 1.94 [1.10,3.43]; P = 0.0195). A similar association was observed for stroke (COCs: 0.106 %, IUDs: 0.057 %; RR = 1.86 [1.49,2.32]; P < 0.0001). The secondary COC2 analysis revealed similar findings.

Conclusions

The present findings suggest that females prescribed COCs have an increased risk of CeAD and stroke compared to matched controls using IUDs. These observations should be viewed as preliminary, require corroboration by other studies, and in isolation do not replace the broader clinical and shared decision-making regarding contraceptive use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联合口服避孕药处方与颈动脉夹层的相关性:一项回顾性队列研究
迄今为止,研究已经确定了复方口服避孕药(COCs)与血管不良事件之间的正相关,然而,关于其与颈动脉夹层(CeAD)可能相关的证据仍然有限。我们通过风险比(RR)测试了COC启动后一年内与启动宫内节育器(iud)的匹配对照组相比,COC与CeAD之间存在正相关的假设。方法:我们查询了2014年至2024年未识别的美国健康记录数据(TriNetX, Inc.),其中15-50岁无脑血管疾病或CeAD的女性,创建了启动COCs或宫内节育器的互排斥队列。我们使用倾向匹配来控制与CeAD相关的变量。我们的主要结局包括1年随访期间CeAD的RR。其次,我们探讨了脑卒中的累积发病率和RR,并检查了COC处方≥2的女性(COC2)的结果。结果匹配后,每个队列有214020例患者(平均年龄31岁)。服用COCs的患者与使用iud的对照组相比,CeAD的发生率和风险更高[95% CI] (COCs: 0.016%, iud: 0.008%;Rr 1.94 [1.10,3.43];p = 0.0195)。卒中也有类似的相关性(COCs: 0.106%,宫内节育器:0.057%;Rr = 1.86 [1.49,2.32];P & lt;0.0001)。二次co2分析显示了类似的结果。结论目前的研究结果表明,与使用宫内节育器的对照组相比,服用COCs的女性患冠心病和卒中的风险增加。这些观察结果应被视为初步的,需要其他研究的证实,并且孤立地不能取代有关避孕药具使用的更广泛的临床和共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thrombosis research
Thrombosis research 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
364
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Thrombosis Research is an international journal dedicated to the swift dissemination of new information on thrombosis, hemostasis, and vascular biology, aimed at advancing both science and clinical care. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research, reviews, editorials, opinions, and critiques, covering both basic and clinical studies. Priority is given to research that promises novel approaches in the diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, and prevention of thrombotic and hemorrhagic diseases.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the editor: Methodological considerations for diagnostic test accuracy meta-analyses. Barriers and facilitators to healthy lifestyle behaviours for people living with post pulmonary embolism syndrome. A qualitative study exploring participants lived experiences. Evaluating clinical outcomes for very early versus late venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with isolated severe spinal trauma. Traditional and whole blood coagulative profiles across different variants of COVID-19 acute pneumonia admitted to the Internal Medicine Ward. aPLs seroconversion in antiphospholipid syndrome: from definition to clinical relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1