Association of preoperative frailty with short- and long-term outcomes after hepatic resection for elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: multicentre analysis.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY BJS Open Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrae171
Yong-Kang Diao, Dan Li, Han Wu, Yi-Fan Yang, Nan-Ya Wang, Wei-Min Gu, Ting-Hao Chen, Jie Li, Hong Wang, Ya-Hao Zhou, Ying-Jian Liang, Xian-Ming Wang, Kong-Ying Lin, Li-Hui Gu, Jia-Hao Xu, Timothy M Pawlik, Wan-Yee Lau, Feng Shen, Tian Yang
{"title":"Association of preoperative frailty with short- and long-term outcomes after hepatic resection for elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: multicentre analysis.","authors":"Yong-Kang Diao, Dan Li, Han Wu, Yi-Fan Yang, Nan-Ya Wang, Wei-Min Gu, Ting-Hao Chen, Jie Li, Hong Wang, Ya-Hao Zhou, Ying-Jian Liang, Xian-Ming Wang, Kong-Ying Lin, Li-Hui Gu, Jia-Hao Xu, Timothy M Pawlik, Wan-Yee Lau, Feng Shen, Tian Yang","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The growing demand for surgical resection in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma highlights the need to understand the impact of preoperative frailty on surgical outcomes. The aim of this multicentre cohort study was to investigate the association between frailty and short- and long-term outcomes after hepatic resection among elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicentre analysis was conducted on elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (aged greater than or equal to 70 years) who underwent curative-intent resection at ten Chinese hospitals from 2012 to 2021. Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (with frailty defined as a Clinical Frailty Scale score greater than or equal to 5). The primary outcomes were overall survival and recurrence-free survival; secondary outcomes encompassed postoperative 30-day morbidity and mortality, and 90-day mortality. The outcomes between patients with and without preoperative frailty were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 488 elderly patients, 148 (30.3%) were considered frail. Frail patients experienced significantly higher 30-day morbidity (68.9% (102 of 148) versus 43.2% (147 of 340)), 30-day mortality (4.1% (6 of 148) versus 0.6% (2 of 340)), and 90-day mortality (6.1% (9 of 148) versus 0.9% (3 of 340)) compared with non-frail patients (all P < 0.010). During a median follow-up of 37.7 (interquartile range 20.4-57.8) months, frail patients demonstrated significantly worse median overall survival (41.6 (95% c.i. 32.0 to 51.2) versus 69.7 (95% c.i. 55.6 to 83.8) months) and recurrence-free survival (27.6 (95% c.i. 23.1 to 32.1) versus 42.7 (95% c.i. 34.6 to 50.8) months) compared with non-frail patients (both P < 0.010). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed frailty as an independent risk factor for decreased overall survival (HR 1.61; P = 0.001) and decreased recurrence-free survival (HR 1.32; P = 0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frailty is significantly associated with adverse short-term and long-term outcomes after resection in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The findings suggest that frailty assessment should be incorporated into perioperative and postoperative evaluation for elderly patients undergoing hepatocellular carcinoma resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11806262/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae171","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The growing demand for surgical resection in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma highlights the need to understand the impact of preoperative frailty on surgical outcomes. The aim of this multicentre cohort study was to investigate the association between frailty and short- and long-term outcomes after hepatic resection among elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Methods: A multicentre analysis was conducted on elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (aged greater than or equal to 70 years) who underwent curative-intent resection at ten Chinese hospitals from 2012 to 2021. Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (with frailty defined as a Clinical Frailty Scale score greater than or equal to 5). The primary outcomes were overall survival and recurrence-free survival; secondary outcomes encompassed postoperative 30-day morbidity and mortality, and 90-day mortality. The outcomes between patients with and without preoperative frailty were compared.

Results: Of the 488 elderly patients, 148 (30.3%) were considered frail. Frail patients experienced significantly higher 30-day morbidity (68.9% (102 of 148) versus 43.2% (147 of 340)), 30-day mortality (4.1% (6 of 148) versus 0.6% (2 of 340)), and 90-day mortality (6.1% (9 of 148) versus 0.9% (3 of 340)) compared with non-frail patients (all P < 0.010). During a median follow-up of 37.7 (interquartile range 20.4-57.8) months, frail patients demonstrated significantly worse median overall survival (41.6 (95% c.i. 32.0 to 51.2) versus 69.7 (95% c.i. 55.6 to 83.8) months) and recurrence-free survival (27.6 (95% c.i. 23.1 to 32.1) versus 42.7 (95% c.i. 34.6 to 50.8) months) compared with non-frail patients (both P < 0.010). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed frailty as an independent risk factor for decreased overall survival (HR 1.61; P = 0.001) and decreased recurrence-free survival (HR 1.32; P = 0.028).

Conclusion: Frailty is significantly associated with adverse short-term and long-term outcomes after resection in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The findings suggest that frailty assessment should be incorporated into perioperative and postoperative evaluation for elderly patients undergoing hepatocellular carcinoma resection.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年肝癌患者肝切除术后术前虚弱与短期和长期预后的关系:多中心分析
背景:老年肝细胞癌患者对手术切除的需求日益增长,这凸显了了解术前虚弱对手术结果影响的必要性。这项多中心队列研究的目的是调查老年肝癌患者肝切除术后虚弱与短期和长期预后之间的关系。方法:对2012年至2021年在中国10家医院接受治愈性肝癌切除术的老年肝癌患者(年龄大于或等于70岁)进行多中心分析。使用临床衰弱量表评估衰弱(衰弱定义为临床衰弱量表评分大于或等于5分)。主要结局是总生存期和无复发生存期;次要结局包括术后30天发病率和死亡率,以及90天死亡率。比较术前虚弱和无术前虚弱患者的预后。结果:488例老年患者中,体弱多病148例(30.3%)。与非体弱患者相比,体弱患者的30天发病率(68.9%(148 / 102)对43.2%(340 / 147))、30天死亡率(4.1%(148 / 6)对0.6%(340 / 2))和90天死亡率(6.1%(148 / 9)对0.9%(340 / 3))显著高于非体弱患者(均P < 0.010)。在37.7个月(四分位数间距20.4-57.8)个月的中位随访期间,体弱患者的中位总生存期(41.6 (95% c.i. 32.0 - 51.2)比69.7 (95% c.i. 55.6 - 83.8)个月)和无复发生存期(27.6 (95% c.i. 23.1 - 32.1)比42.7 (95% c.i. 34.6 - 50.8)个月)明显低于非体弱患者(P均< 0.010)。多变量Cox回归分析显示,虚弱是总生存率降低的独立危险因素(HR 1.61;P = 0.001),无复发生存率降低(HR 1.32;P = 0.028)。结论:老年肝癌切除术后的短期和长期不良预后与虚弱有显著关系。提示老年肝癌切除术患者围手术期及术后评价应纳入衰弱评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Comparison of two bundles for reducing surgical site infection in colorectal surgery: multicentre cohort study. Best of upper gastrointestinal surgery in 2025. Long-term outcomes of Lichtenstein and laparoscopic primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: registry-based propensity score-matched analysis. Effect of hospital volume on gastric cancer resection outcome in Switzerland: 24-year nationwide retrospective analysis. Impact of prehabilitation on patient-perceived quality of recovery after surgery: prospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1