Effects of biologic therapy on novel indices of lung inhomogeneity in patients with severe type-2 high asthma.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM BMJ Open Respiratory Research Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002721
Asma Alamoudi, Lorenzo Petralia, Nicholas M J Smith, Haopeng Xu, Dominic Sandhu, Graham Richmond, Nick P Talbot, Grant Ad Ritchie, Ian Pavord, Peter A Robbins, Nayia Petousi
{"title":"Effects of biologic therapy on novel indices of lung inhomogeneity in patients with severe type-2 high asthma.","authors":"Asma Alamoudi, Lorenzo Petralia, Nicholas M J Smith, Haopeng Xu, Dominic Sandhu, Graham Richmond, Nick P Talbot, Grant Ad Ritchie, Ian Pavord, Peter A Robbins, Nayia Petousi","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/aim: </strong>Lung inhomogeneity measures obtained using computed cardiopulmonography (CCP) are sensitive to small-airways disease. Here, we assessed changes in lung inhomogeneity in patients with type-2 high asthma treated with biological therapy and explored the relationship between inhomogeneity measures and conventional asthma disease markers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an observational study of 91 severe type-2 high asthma patients recruited from a tertiary asthma clinic, of whom 67 subsequently started anti-IL5 or anti-IL5R biologics. Patients were evaluated at baseline and, 54 of those commencing biologics, at their fourth injection with either mepolizumab or benralizumab. Assessments included prebronchodilator and postbronchodilator CCP and spirometry, and measurements of blood eosinophil count (BEC), fractional exhaled nitric oxide and Asthma-Symptom Questionnaire (ACQ-5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bronchodilation significantly reduced σlnCl, a novel CCP-derived ventilation inhomogeneity index, (ΔσlnCl -0.08, 95% CI (-0.10 to -0.05), p<0.001). Baseline σlnCl, but not forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>) % predicted, was significantly associated with BEC (linear mixed-effects (LME) regression coefficient for BEC 0.18, 95% CI (0.04, 0.32), p=0.01). Following biologics, improvements in σlnCl were significantly dependent on BEC (LME regression coefficient +0.19, 95% CI (0.11, 0.27), p<0.001) whereas improvements in FEV<sub>1</sub> % predicted related to both BEC and ACQ-5 responses (LME coefficients: BEC -10.8 % pred, 95% CI (-16.1,-5.5); ACQ-5 -3.5 % pred, 95% CI (-5.1 to -1.9), p<0.001). Following biologics, the change in σlnCl followed a bimodal distribution that dichotomised patients into σlnCl-Responders and σlnCl-Non-Responders. Responders, unlike Non-Responders, experienced significant improvements in symptoms and FEV<sub>1</sub> % predicted (Δ pre-BD FEV<sub>1</sub>15±15% pred, p<0.001) and included a higher proportion of patients in clinical remission at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>σlnCl is strongly associated with systemic eosinophilic inflammation in severe type-2 high asthma. An early σlnCl response following anti-IL5 biologics identifies patients more likely to experience improvements in symptoms and lung function when systemic eosinophils are depleted. σlnCl may provide a sensitive route for tracking inflammation involving the small airways.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002721","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/aim: Lung inhomogeneity measures obtained using computed cardiopulmonography (CCP) are sensitive to small-airways disease. Here, we assessed changes in lung inhomogeneity in patients with type-2 high asthma treated with biological therapy and explored the relationship between inhomogeneity measures and conventional asthma disease markers.

Methods: This was an observational study of 91 severe type-2 high asthma patients recruited from a tertiary asthma clinic, of whom 67 subsequently started anti-IL5 or anti-IL5R biologics. Patients were evaluated at baseline and, 54 of those commencing biologics, at their fourth injection with either mepolizumab or benralizumab. Assessments included prebronchodilator and postbronchodilator CCP and spirometry, and measurements of blood eosinophil count (BEC), fractional exhaled nitric oxide and Asthma-Symptom Questionnaire (ACQ-5).

Results: Bronchodilation significantly reduced σlnCl, a novel CCP-derived ventilation inhomogeneity index, (ΔσlnCl -0.08, 95% CI (-0.10 to -0.05), p<0.001). Baseline σlnCl, but not forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) % predicted, was significantly associated with BEC (linear mixed-effects (LME) regression coefficient for BEC 0.18, 95% CI (0.04, 0.32), p=0.01). Following biologics, improvements in σlnCl were significantly dependent on BEC (LME regression coefficient +0.19, 95% CI (0.11, 0.27), p<0.001) whereas improvements in FEV1 % predicted related to both BEC and ACQ-5 responses (LME coefficients: BEC -10.8 % pred, 95% CI (-16.1,-5.5); ACQ-5 -3.5 % pred, 95% CI (-5.1 to -1.9), p<0.001). Following biologics, the change in σlnCl followed a bimodal distribution that dichotomised patients into σlnCl-Responders and σlnCl-Non-Responders. Responders, unlike Non-Responders, experienced significant improvements in symptoms and FEV1 % predicted (Δ pre-BD FEV115±15% pred, p<0.001) and included a higher proportion of patients in clinical remission at 1 year.

Conclusion: σlnCl is strongly associated with systemic eosinophilic inflammation in severe type-2 high asthma. An early σlnCl response following anti-IL5 biologics identifies patients more likely to experience improvements in symptoms and lung function when systemic eosinophils are depleted. σlnCl may provide a sensitive route for tracking inflammation involving the small airways.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Psychosocial and mental health in cystic fibrosis in the modern era of care: time to evolve. Radiological abnormalities persist following COVID-19 and correlate with impaired health-related quality of life: a prospective cohort study of hospitalised patients. Effects of biologic therapy on novel indices of lung inhomogeneity in patients with severe type-2 high asthma. Uptake and 4-week outcomes of an 'opt-out' smoking cessation referral strategy in a London-based lung cancer screening setting. Qualitative study of patients experiences and perceptions of stepping down asthma medication in primary care across England.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1