Developing and piloting a peer quality improvement coaching protocol for front-line healthcare staff.

IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Open Quality Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002967
Petar Popivanov, Siobhan Eithne McCarthy, Mairead Finn
{"title":"Developing and piloting a peer quality improvement coaching protocol for front-line healthcare staff.","authors":"Petar Popivanov, Siobhan Eithne McCarthy, Mairead Finn","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Improving the quality of patient care remains a global necessity. Despite system and professional benefits, current evidence indicates that the spread of improvement principles among front-line healthcare workers remains poor.While education and training alone are unlikely to result in consistent improvement practice, coaching can play a critical role in sustainable, evidence-based improvement implementation. Peer quality improvement coaching (PQIC) places the power and agency in the shared relationship between coach and coachee to shape coachee quality improvement (QI) outcomes.Study objective was to develop and pilot an evidence-based protocol for implementation and evaluation of a PQIC for front-line staff engaged in small to intermediate improvement efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multistage case-study design and implementation process. First, a systematised literature review identified themes about the theory and practice of QI coaching (QIC). Second, these themes guided the development of a PQIC protocol. Finally, the protocol was piloted and evaluated among staff in a single-centre tertiary maternity hospital. PQIC effectiveness was assessed using evaluation tools identified in the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Effectiveness; strategies and models; moderating factors and methods for evaluation of QIC emerged from the literature. Together with Bloom's taxonomy and Kirkpatrick's educational model, these themes informed the development of this PQIC protocol. It was piloted in three steps: education, coaching and evaluation. A survey revealed that the participants in the education step achieved excellent scores. Following the coaching journey, the coached multidisciplinary team leaders completed their improvement initiatives and demonstrated increased QI knowledge and skills measured by the 'IHI improvement advisor self-assessment tool' and 'IHI assessment scale for collaboratives'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Built on established education, peer coaching and QI concepts, this evidence-based PQIC protocol adds to international evidence on how to support front-line healthcare workers in their improvement efforts. Future research needs to assess protocol effectiveness across different settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Improving the quality of patient care remains a global necessity. Despite system and professional benefits, current evidence indicates that the spread of improvement principles among front-line healthcare workers remains poor.While education and training alone are unlikely to result in consistent improvement practice, coaching can play a critical role in sustainable, evidence-based improvement implementation. Peer quality improvement coaching (PQIC) places the power and agency in the shared relationship between coach and coachee to shape coachee quality improvement (QI) outcomes.Study objective was to develop and pilot an evidence-based protocol for implementation and evaluation of a PQIC for front-line staff engaged in small to intermediate improvement efforts.

Methods: We conducted a multistage case-study design and implementation process. First, a systematised literature review identified themes about the theory and practice of QI coaching (QIC). Second, these themes guided the development of a PQIC protocol. Finally, the protocol was piloted and evaluated among staff in a single-centre tertiary maternity hospital. PQIC effectiveness was assessed using evaluation tools identified in the literature.

Results: Effectiveness; strategies and models; moderating factors and methods for evaluation of QIC emerged from the literature. Together with Bloom's taxonomy and Kirkpatrick's educational model, these themes informed the development of this PQIC protocol. It was piloted in three steps: education, coaching and evaluation. A survey revealed that the participants in the education step achieved excellent scores. Following the coaching journey, the coached multidisciplinary team leaders completed their improvement initiatives and demonstrated increased QI knowledge and skills measured by the 'IHI improvement advisor self-assessment tool' and 'IHI assessment scale for collaboratives'.

Conclusion: Built on established education, peer coaching and QI concepts, this evidence-based PQIC protocol adds to international evidence on how to support front-line healthcare workers in their improvement efforts. Future research needs to assess protocol effectiveness across different settings.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为一线医护人员制定和试行同伴质量改进指导协议。
背景:提高患者护理质量仍然是全球的需要。尽管有制度和专业上的好处,目前的证据表明,改善原则在一线卫生保健工作者中的传播仍然很差。虽然单独的教育和培训不太可能产生一致的改进实践,但指导可以在可持续的、基于证据的改进实施中发挥关键作用。同伴素质提升辅导(PQIC)将权力和代理置于教练员和被教练员之间的共享关系中,以形成教练员素质提升(QI)的结果。研究的目的是为从事小到中级改进工作的一线员工制定和试点一项基于证据的PQIC实施和评估方案。方法:采用多阶段案例研究设计与实施方法。首先,系统的文献综述确定了有关QI教练(QIC)的理论和实践的主题。其次,这些主题指导了PQIC协议的开发。最后,在一家单中心三级妇产医院的工作人员中试行和评价了该议定书。使用文献中确定的评估工具评估PQIC的有效性。结果:有效性;策略和模式;QIC的调节因素和评价方法来源于文献。与Bloom的分类法和Kirkpatrick的教育模型一起,这些主题为PQIC协议的发展提供了信息。试点分三个步骤进行:教育、指导和评估。一项调查显示,参加教育步骤的人取得了优异的成绩。在指导之旅之后,被指导的多学科团队领导完成了他们的改进计划,并展示了通过“IHI改进顾问自我评估工具”和“IHI协作评估量表”衡量的QI知识和技能的增加。结论:基于已建立的教育、同伴指导和QI概念,这一基于证据的PQIC协议为如何支持一线医护人员改善工作增加了国际证据。未来的研究需要评估不同环境下协议的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hospital standardised mortality ratio: a novel method and approach to risk adjustment. Improving social needs screening in general paediatrics through project SEEK. Best possible medication history interview guide: a rapid scoping review. Implementing consistent pretreatment multidisciplinary review for breast cancer: a quality improvement project. Building capacity for integrated health care-nursing education initiatives in a Canadian mental health setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1