Improving drug charting practices and documentation among nurses in emergency department at a regional hospital, Bhutan: a quality improvement initiative.

IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Open Quality Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003188
Pema Wangmo, Sherab Wangdi, Gyem Lhamo, Jamyang Dorji, Jigme Wangmo, Nima Wangchuk, Hem Kumar Nepal
{"title":"Improving drug charting practices and documentation among nurses in emergency department at a regional hospital, Bhutan: a quality improvement initiative.","authors":"Pema Wangmo, Sherab Wangdi, Gyem Lhamo, Jamyang Dorji, Jigme Wangmo, Nima Wangchuk, Hem Kumar Nepal","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medication error is one of the most common safety issues and the highest prevalence rate of preventable medication-related harm is seen in low-income and middle-income countries especially in Africa and South Asian countries. Studies done elsewhere show that medication errors related to transcription and drug chart documentation can be as high as 70%. A baseline survey done in our department showed that our drug charting practices and documentation are only complete in 45% which could significantly contribute to medication errors and patient safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To address this gap, our project aimed to improve the drug charting practices and documentation among nurses in our department from 45% to more than 90% in 8 weeks. We formed a team and implemented strategies through four plan-do-study-act cycles. Interventions included increasing sensitisation about hospital transcription protocol, standardising drug charts and monitoring of drug chart practice. The members meet every 2 weeks to discuss, analyse and plan for next intervention based on our findings at the end of every cycle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of the project, the completeness of drug chart documentation improved from 45% to 98% and adherence to standard charting practices from 51% to 98% CONCLUSION: Medication transcription error is common and improving on incomplete drug chart and poor charting practices can reduce errors. Our results emphasise the importance of simple and cost-effective intervention in bringing and achieving the aim which could be implemented in other department and institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"13 Suppl 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12164299/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Medication error is one of the most common safety issues and the highest prevalence rate of preventable medication-related harm is seen in low-income and middle-income countries especially in Africa and South Asian countries. Studies done elsewhere show that medication errors related to transcription and drug chart documentation can be as high as 70%. A baseline survey done in our department showed that our drug charting practices and documentation are only complete in 45% which could significantly contribute to medication errors and patient safety.

Methods: To address this gap, our project aimed to improve the drug charting practices and documentation among nurses in our department from 45% to more than 90% in 8 weeks. We formed a team and implemented strategies through four plan-do-study-act cycles. Interventions included increasing sensitisation about hospital transcription protocol, standardising drug charts and monitoring of drug chart practice. The members meet every 2 weeks to discuss, analyse and plan for next intervention based on our findings at the end of every cycle.

Results: At the end of the project, the completeness of drug chart documentation improved from 45% to 98% and adherence to standard charting practices from 51% to 98% CONCLUSION: Medication transcription error is common and improving on incomplete drug chart and poor charting practices can reduce errors. Our results emphasise the importance of simple and cost-effective intervention in bringing and achieving the aim which could be implemented in other department and institutions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改进不丹一家地区医院急诊科护士的药物图表做法和文件编制:一项质量改进倡议。
用药错误是最常见的安全问题之一,可预防的药物相关伤害发生率最高的是低收入和中等收入国家,特别是非洲和南亚国家。其他地方的研究表明,与转录和药物图表文件相关的用药错误可能高达70%。在我们部门进行的一项基线调查显示,我们的药物图表实践和文件只有45%是完整的,这可能会严重导致用药错误和患者安全。方法:为了解决这一差距,我们的项目旨在通过8周的时间,将我科护士的药物图表操作和文件记录从45%提高到90%以上。我们组成了一个团队,通过四个计划-执行-研究-行动周期来实施策略。干预措施包括提高对医院转录协议的敏感性,标准化药物图表和监测药物图表实践。成员们每两周开会一次,在每个周期结束时根据我们的发现讨论、分析和计划下一步的干预措施。结果:项目结束时,药物图表文件的完整性从45%提高到98%,对标准图表操作的依从性从51%提高到98%。结论:药物转录错误是常见的,改进不完整的药物图表和不良的图表操作可以减少错误。我们的研究结果强调了简单和具有成本效益的干预措施在实现和实现目标方面的重要性,这些措施可以在其他部门和机构实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Improved pain management after tonsil surgery in adults: a quality improvement programme. Impact of establishing a comprehensive tobacco cessation service at a primary healthcare setting in the quit attempts: a quality improvement project. 'Situation awareness' in midwifery practice: a scoping review. Achieving effective and timely quality of care in same-day discharge total hip arthroplasty without compromising patient safety. Patient safety culture and associated factors among healthcare professionals at public hospitals in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1