Patient safety culture through the perspectives of healthcare workers: a longitudinal study in a private healthcare network in Brazil.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Open Quality Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003020
Helidea de Oliveira Lima, Leopoldo Muniz da Silva, Ana Claudia Lopes Fernandes de Araújo, Vanessa de Melo Silva Torres, Leandro Reis Tavares, Deborah Simões, Saullo Queiroz Silveira, Anthony Mh Ho, Glenio B Mizubuti, Joaquim Edson Vieira
{"title":"Patient safety culture through the perspectives of healthcare workers: a longitudinal study in a private healthcare network in Brazil.","authors":"Helidea de Oliveira Lima, Leopoldo Muniz da Silva, Ana Claudia Lopes Fernandes de Araújo, Vanessa de Melo Silva Torres, Leandro Reis Tavares, Deborah Simões, Saullo Queiroz Silveira, Anthony Mh Ho, Glenio B Mizubuti, Joaquim Edson Vieira","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhancing security and dependability of health systems necessitates resource allocation, a well-defined infrastructure and a steadfast commitment to ensuring its safety and stability over time.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the temporal trend of patient safety culture according to the perception of professionals working in a private healthcare network in Brazil over a 7-year period (2015-2022).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture questionnaire was distributed to 34 hospitals between 2015 and 2022 with 160 607 responders. A linear mixed-effects regression model was applied to fit the trend for the dimension score over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 12 measured dimensions in the HSOPSC Survey, 8 showed significant improvement over a 7-year period (p<0.05). The dimensions of communication openness (p=0.22), non-punitive response to errors (p=0.08), staffing (p=0.06) and the frequency of reported events (p=0.22) have not demonstrated improvement over time. Management support for patient safety and organisational learning received positive responses from at least 75% of those surveyed in 2022, earning the distinction as 'strong areas of patient safety'. Comparing 2015 and 2022, the proportion of participants who rated their unit/work area on patient safety as 'fair' or 'good' decreased, while the proportion of participants who considered it 'very good' increased (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings indicate an improvement in patient safety culture from 2015 to 2022. Key challenges identified in enhancing safety culture included communication openness, staffing, frequency of reported events, and nonpunitive response to errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11891519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Enhancing security and dependability of health systems necessitates resource allocation, a well-defined infrastructure and a steadfast commitment to ensuring its safety and stability over time.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the temporal trend of patient safety culture according to the perception of professionals working in a private healthcare network in Brazil over a 7-year period (2015-2022).

Methods: The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture questionnaire was distributed to 34 hospitals between 2015 and 2022 with 160 607 responders. A linear mixed-effects regression model was applied to fit the trend for the dimension score over time.

Results: Out of the 12 measured dimensions in the HSOPSC Survey, 8 showed significant improvement over a 7-year period (p<0.05). The dimensions of communication openness (p=0.22), non-punitive response to errors (p=0.08), staffing (p=0.06) and the frequency of reported events (p=0.22) have not demonstrated improvement over time. Management support for patient safety and organisational learning received positive responses from at least 75% of those surveyed in 2022, earning the distinction as 'strong areas of patient safety'. Comparing 2015 and 2022, the proportion of participants who rated their unit/work area on patient safety as 'fair' or 'good' decreased, while the proportion of participants who considered it 'very good' increased (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Findings indicate an improvement in patient safety culture from 2015 to 2022. Key challenges identified in enhancing safety culture included communication openness, staffing, frequency of reported events, and nonpunitive response to errors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating multifaceted strategies to prevent nasoenteral tube complications and achieve significant cost savings in critically ill patients: the ENHANCE-CRIT trial. Targeting insulin stacking to address overnight hypoglycaemia in hospitalised patients with diabetes. Patient safety culture through the perspectives of healthcare workers: a longitudinal study in a private healthcare network in Brazil. Service-level interventions to reduce waiting time in outpatient and community health settings may be sustained: a systematic review. Improving drug charting practices and documentation among nurses in emergency department at a regional hospital, Bhutan: a quality improvement initiative.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1