Shawn G Kwatra, Ashis K Das, Eunice Chang, Caleb Paydar, Donia Bahloul, Chao Chen, Ryan B Thomas
{"title":"Healthcare Resource Utilization and Economic Burden of Prurigo Nodularis in the United States.","authors":"Shawn G Kwatra, Ashis K Das, Eunice Chang, Caleb Paydar, Donia Bahloul, Chao Chen, Ryan B Thomas","doi":"10.1007/s13555-025-01349-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The impacts of prurigo nodularis (PN) on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs are unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, cross-sectional claims analysis (IQVIA PharMetrics<sup>®</sup> Plus) compared HCRU and costs over 1 year in adults with PN versus matched controls (region, payer type, age, sex, year) from 2016 to 2019, and also in patients with PN receiving advanced versus localized/no therapy. For patients with data in multiple calendar years, 1 year was randomly selected. Outcomes were compared by chi-square tests, t tests, or negative binomial tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We matched 16,888 patients with PN with 16,888 controls. Most comorbidities (mental health, metabolic conditions, type 2 inflammatory diseases) appeared more frequently in patients with PN versus controls. HCRU was significantly (P < 0.001) higher for patients with PN versus controls, including mean (standard deviation, SD) number of outpatient visits (17.0 [15.5] vs 8.1 [10.7]) and proportion of patients with hospitalizations (9.3% vs 5.9%). Mean (SD) total costs were significantly (P < 0.001) greater for patients with PN versus controls ($18,315 [$66,476] vs $8451 [$30,982]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with PN receiving advanced therapy had higher HCRU and costs versus localized/no therapy. Patients with PN (particularly those receiving advanced therapies) incurred higher all-cause HCRU burden and associated costs than matched controls. Enhanced feature (slides, video, animation) (MP4 12313 KB).</p>","PeriodicalId":11186,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"413-425"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11832852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-025-01349-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The impacts of prurigo nodularis (PN) on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs are unclear.
Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional claims analysis (IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus) compared HCRU and costs over 1 year in adults with PN versus matched controls (region, payer type, age, sex, year) from 2016 to 2019, and also in patients with PN receiving advanced versus localized/no therapy. For patients with data in multiple calendar years, 1 year was randomly selected. Outcomes were compared by chi-square tests, t tests, or negative binomial tests.
Results: We matched 16,888 patients with PN with 16,888 controls. Most comorbidities (mental health, metabolic conditions, type 2 inflammatory diseases) appeared more frequently in patients with PN versus controls. HCRU was significantly (P < 0.001) higher for patients with PN versus controls, including mean (standard deviation, SD) number of outpatient visits (17.0 [15.5] vs 8.1 [10.7]) and proportion of patients with hospitalizations (9.3% vs 5.9%). Mean (SD) total costs were significantly (P < 0.001) greater for patients with PN versus controls ($18,315 [$66,476] vs $8451 [$30,982]).
Conclusions: Patients with PN receiving advanced therapy had higher HCRU and costs versus localized/no therapy. Patients with PN (particularly those receiving advanced therapies) incurred higher all-cause HCRU burden and associated costs than matched controls. Enhanced feature (slides, video, animation) (MP4 12313 KB).
期刊介绍：
Dermatology and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance). The journal is dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of dermatological therapies. Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health and epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
Areas of focus include, but are not limited to all clinical aspects of dermatology, such as skin pharmacology; skin development and aging; prevention, diagnosis, and management of skin disorders and melanomas; research into dermal structures and pathology; and all areas of aesthetic dermatology, including skin maintenance, dermatological surgery, and lasers.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports/case series, trial protocols, and short communications. Dermatology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an International and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of quality research, which may be considered of insufficient interest by other journals. The journal appeals to a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
