Dermatology and Therapy最新文献

Introduction: Secukinumab has proven to be effective and safe in psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in the phase 3 studies. However, data on real-world practice is limited.

Methods: This study is an ongoing, multicenter, 2-year observational study that focuses on patients with moderate to severe plaque PsO, active PsA, or AS receiving secukinumab. The aim of this study is to present baseline data for the entire study population.

Results: A total of 127 patients were enrolled, with 101 having PsO, 12 with PsA, and 14 with AS. Among the patients, approximately 54.0% were male. The mean body mass index ranged from 25.0 to 27.4 kg/m² across all groups. Patients with PsO had the longest disease duration with an average of 11.0 years, followed by AS (3.0 years) and PsA (1.0 year). Previous biologic therapy was observed in 6.9-8.1% of patients. Baseline disease severity scores revealed moderate to severe disease. In the PsO group, the mean Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score was 16.1. For patients with PsA, the mean Tender Joint Count was 9.1, and the mean Swollen Joint Count was 6.7. In the AS group, the mean Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index score was 4.6, and the mean Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score was 3.7.

Conclusion: The study demonstrates disease durations, disease activity, and treatment history in Thai patients that were generally consistent with previous randomized controlled studies. Long-term data on the efficacy and safety of the treatment will be presented in future publications.

Introduction: Acne is a one of the most frequent skin conditions among teenagers and young adults. It is currently managed with topical retinoids and antibiotics, which can present numerous side effects, thus reducing treatment adherence and effectiveness. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of a novel dermo-cosmetic cream (α-AZ) in treating mild to moderate acne.

Methods: Subjects were randomized into three groups: group 1 received α-AZ cream, group 2 was treated with α-AZ combined with an oral acne treatment routine, and group 3 received a topical acne treatment, for 84 days. All treated patients underwent a 28-day maintenance period with α-AZ cream. Total acne and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) scoring, quality of life (QoL), and skin tolerance were all evaluated during the treatment and maintenance periods.

Results: Acne and PIH lesions significantly decreased in group 1 compared to group 3 (p < 0.001), with a reduction in acne of 66.52 ± 2.92% in group 1 versus 52.55 ± 3.90% in group 3. Patients in group 1 achieved nearly clear skin by the end of the treatment. α-AZ cream treatment was well tolerated and all participants experienced an enhanced QoL. Participants expressed high satisfaction. Additional enhancements in all groups were noted during the maintenance phase across all clinical parameters.

Conclusion: The novel dermo-cosmetic α-AZ cream could serve as a valuable new approach to current treatments for mild and moderate acne. It can be used alone, as a once-daily adjuvant to oral acne treatments, or as part of a maintenance regimen.

Trial registration: ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN70142596, registered retrospectively on 11/12/2023.

Introduction: Patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) experience significantly delayed diagnoses of 7-10 years from symptom onset on average, but the reasons for this remain largely unknown. This study investigated drivers of diagnostic delay from the perspective of healthcare system equity.

Methods: A literature review was performed to identify published factors associated with delayed HS diagnosis to inform data analysis. Clinical and demographic data from the Adelphi HS Disease Specific Programme (DSP)™, a real-world cross-sectional survey of dermatologists and their consulting patients in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK and the USA in 2020/2021, were used to model factors influencing delay to diagnosis from onset of symptoms and first consultation.

Results: Factors influencing delay to HS diagnosis in the literature with the most available evidence were misdiagnosis, delay in specialist referral and patient embarrassment. Data analysis revealed that increasing age was associated with reduced diagnostic delay after symptom onset. Patients with HS who were White or in Germany were also more likely to receive a faster diagnosis. Smokers, patients with concomitant conditions, or a family history of HS were slower to be diagnosed. When time to diagnosis following first consultation was assessed, increasing age was associated with quicker diagnosis. Moreover, patients with a family history of HS were diagnosed quicker, whereas those with high body mass index, more concomitant conditions, in employment, managed by multiple physicians or European were more delayed.

Conclusion: On the basis of a thorough analysis of real-world data, multiple factors that potentially influenced the timely diagnosis of HS have been identified. For the first time, this study quantifies the relative impact of these modifiers, providing valuable insights into areas that require attention for faster diagnoses and improved disease outcomes.

Introduction: Biologic treatments have made complete skin clearance in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis a real possibility. Although clinical trials demonstrated the superiority of bimekizumab over secukinumab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab, direct comparisons with other biologics are not available. This systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to evaluate the 1-year efficacy and safety of bimekizumab versus other biologic systemic therapies for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Methods: We conducted an SLR to retrieve published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and PsycINFO on 13 January 2022. Two NMA types were used to analyse the long-term achievement of 100% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 100): (1) NMA of cumulative clinical benefits, based on the area under the curve, from week 0 to 52; (2) multinomial NMA at weeks 44‒60. Binomial NMA was used to evaluate long-term serious adverse events (SAEs).

Results: The SLR identified 38 RCTs, of which 19 were included in the NMA. Bimekizumab 320 mg administered every 4 weeks to week 16 then every 8 weeks (Q4W/Q8W) showed a greater cumulative average number of days of PASI 100 response compared with all other biologics. These differences were statistically significant versus all biologics, except risankizumab 150 mg. The multinomial NMA demonstrated that interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors were the most efficacious treatments. No significant differences were found in long-term occurrence of SAEs.

Conclusion: Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W was superior to most other treatments in maintaining complete skin clearance during the first year of treatment. It demonstrated a greater cumulative average number of days with completely clear skin while displaying a comparable safety profile compared with all other biologics.

Introduction: Melasma is a common acquired disorder of melanogenesis that predominately affects women and presents as hyperpigmented skin lesions mainly located on the face. The study aims to investigate the epidemiologic characteristics and hormonal profiles in melasma patients.

Methods: One hundred fifty patients were enrolled in this study in a tertiary care hospital. Clinical patterns, pigment depth, disease severity, underlying conditions, and heredity were recorded. Endocrinologic profile and vitamin D levels were assessed.

Results: On clinical examination, the condition indicated a centrofacial localization in 74% of the patients. Extra facial melasma was noticed in 10 patients who had centrofacial melasma to begin with. Wood's lamp examination showed the dermal type as the most common. A family history of melasma was noted in 38% of the patients. Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) score ranged from 0.3 to 10.8, with a mean score of 4.12 ± 2.06. Pregnancy-induced melasma was reported in 36.1% of the patients. In 17.4% of women, melasma was related to using oral contraceptives. In 22% of patients, mild vitamin D deficiency was detected, while 21% had thyroid disorders.

Conclusion: There is a strong correlation between family history and prevalence of melasma. Sun exposure is a major precipitating factor and should be carefully addressed in Mediterranean countries like Greece. However, other factors such as concomitant medication, multiple pregnancies, use of oral contraceptives, thyroid disorders and vitamin D deficiency might precipitate melasma.

Background: Combination therapy is required for the treatment of moderate acne vulgaris. However, patient compliance in applying multiple topical formulations is poor.

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination gel with adapalene 0.1% and clindamycin 1% (adapalene-clindamycin) relative to adapalene 0.1% monotherapy and clindamycin 1% monotherapy in patients with moderate facial acne vulgaris.

Methods: This was a randomized, controlled, assessor-blind, phase III study conducted in patients with moderate facial acne vulgaris.

Results: A total of 1617 patients were enrolled. At week 12, patients in the adapalene-clindamycin gel treatment group showed a significant reduction in the percentage change from baseline in total lesion count (- 66.85%), compared with adapalene alone (- 50.82%) or clindamycin gel alone (- 57.61%). The difference in the least square means of the adapalene-clindamycin gel group and adapalene group, or clindamycin gel group was - 16.08% (95% CI - 19.95% to - 12.21%) and - 9.38% (95% CI - 13.25% to - 5.51%;), respectively. At week 12, 19.28% of participants who received adapalene-clindamycin gel achieved at least 2-grade improvement in IGA, versus 7.74% with adapalene gel (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.93, 4.80) and 14.77% with clindamycin gel (OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.97, 2.07). The study also achieved all its secondary endpoints. Adverse event rates were mostly mild to moderate and comparable across the three treatment groups.

Conclusion: Adapalene 0.1%-clindamycin 1% combination gel is well tolerated and demonstrated superior efficacy over 0.1% adapalene gel monotherapy and 1% clindamycin gel monotherapy for the treatment of moderate acne vulgaris.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03615768.

Introduction: Difamilast has proven to be an effective treatment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) in Japan, but its cost-effectiveness remains unknown. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of difamilast 1% compared with delgocitinib 0.5% in Japanese adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD and compared with placebo in Japanese adult patients with all-severity AD from a Japanese public health-care perspective.

Methods: The analysis was conducted using a cost-effectiveness model from the Japanese public health-care perspective. This model had four health states ("clear," "mild," "moderate," and "severe") defined according to the Eczema Area and Severity Index score. The time horizon of the analysis was 1 year. Because the analysis period was short, no discount rate was applied. The proportions of patients previously estimated by the anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison were implemented in the model. The model was further populated with data from the literature. The main model outcomes were quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), costs, and outcomes, including the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. All prices were stated in JPY at the price level from 2018 April to 2019 March. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were performed to assess the robustness of the results.

Results: In the base case, the cost-effectiveness of difamilast 1% compared with delgocitinib 0.5% and placebo was JPY 827,054/QALY and JPY 1,518,657/QALY, respectively. The PSA showed that the cost-effectiveness of difamilast 1% compared with delgocitinib 0.5% and placebo had a 66.6% and 99.6% probability of being below the JPY 5 million/QALY threshold, respectively.

Conclusion: The results suggest that difamilast 1% is a more cost-effective treatment option compared with delgocitinib 0.5% in Japanese adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD and compared with placebo in adult patients with all-severity AD from a Japanese public health-care perspective.

Introduction: Seborrheic dermatitis (SD) is a common, chronic inflammatory skin disease, but the physical and emotional burden of patients with SD experience has not been well characterized.

Methods: The Harris Poll conducted online surveys of US patients and healthcare providers (HCPs) from December 2021 to January 2022.

Results: Almost half of patients reported that SD negatively impacts their emotional and physical well-being "a lot/a great deal"; HCPs underestimate the level of impact on patients. Most patients with SD reported a significant mental health impact, including anxiety, depression, anxiety about interacting with other people, and isolation. Two-thirds of patients said they did not know anyone else who had been diagnosed with SD, and even after diagnosis, less than half of patients still said they did not know anyone else with SD. Nearly all patients and HCPs agreed that it was challenging to hide SD symptoms, and most patients felt embarrassed when people commented on their SD symptoms. Most patients agreed that they would be further along in their career if they did not have SD, and SD symptoms made them less confident at work and less likely to want to interact with people at work. Almost half of patients reported ever missing work as a result of SD symptoms.

Conclusion: These insights emphasize the physical and emotional patient burden associated with SD, impacting all aspects of patients' lives. Graphical abstract available for this article.

Introduction: Despite advancements in the treatment of psoriasis (PsO), there are few head-to-head studies assessing comparative effectiveness of the newest therapies approved to treat PsO. Our objective was to assess the comparative clinical effectiveness of risankizumab and deucravacitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe PsO.

Methods: This placebo-anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) analysis utilized data from UltIMMa-1/2 risankizumab and POETYK PSO-1/2 deucravacitinib trials. Individual patient data from UltiMMA-1/2 were weighted via propensity score to match POETYK PSO-1/2 published summary data. Rate differences between risankizumab and deucravacitinib were assessed for Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75/90/100, the Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA = 0 or 0/1), and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0/1.

Results: At 16 weeks, risankizumab-treated patients demonstrated statistically significantly higher rates of skin clearance and greater improvement in quality of life (QoL) compared to those treated with deucravacitinib. Across all outcomes, risankizumab demonstrated a lower number needed to treat compared to deucravacitinib. Limitations are potential bias due to unobserved/unmeasurable differences and limited generalizability of the results.

Conclusions: This indirect comparison demonstrates that risankizumab has higher rates of skin clearance and greater improvements in QoL than deucravacitinib. This study will help inform healthcare providers in their treatment and management strategy of PsO.

Introduction: Chronic Hand Eczema (CHE) is an inflammatory skin disease that causes significant impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Hand Eczema Impact Scale (HEIS) is a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure designed to assess the impact of CHE on key domains of HRQoL. This study aimed to develop and evaluate content and psychometric validity of the HEIS.

Methods: The HEIS was initially developed on the basis of a literature review and concept elicitation interviews. Qualitative cognitive debriefing interviews (n = 20) were conducted with patients with CHE to assess relevance and understanding of items, response options, and recall period. Psychometric properties (item performance, dimensionality, reliability, validity, responsiveness, and estimation of meaningful change thresholds) were then assessed using data (n = 258) from a phase 2b trial (NCT03683719).

Results: Cognitive debriefing confirmed all items were understood and relevant to patients. Inter-item correlations (all > 0.50) and confirmatory factor analysis (factor loadings ≥ 0.80) supported unidimensionality of the HEIS score, and mostly provided support for the HEIS Proximal Daily Activity Limitations (PDAL) score, with only one item loading below the prespecified threshold. Item properties and previous qualitative work supported retaining this item in the total score but removed from the HEIS PDAL domain. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.89) and test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient ≥ 0.79) results were very strong. Strong correlations with concurrent measures (0.66-0.87) and significant differences between severity groups (p < 0.001) supported construct validity. Large effect sizes for mean change scores in participants that improved and significant differences between groups indicated ability to detect change. Anchor-based analyses supported within-individual responder definitions of ≥ 1.3 points for improvements in both HEIS score and HEIS PDAL score (covering three items) and of ≥ 1.5 points for HEIS embarrassment with the appearance of hands (Emb) score (covering two items).

Conclusions: The 9-item HEIS is the first CHE-specific PRO measure developed and validated according to regulatory guidance for assessment of the impact of CHE on key domains of HRQoL. This article provides evidence of strong content and psychometric validity and shows improvements of ≥ 1.3 points in HEIS score and HEIS PDAL score, and improvements of ≥ 1.5 points in HEIS Emb score represent clinically meaningful, important changes.

Trial registration: NCT03683719.