Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy with Pencil Beam Scanning for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Toxicity Profiles, Survival Outcomes, and Prognostic Indicators
Ningyi Ma MD, PhD , Xue Ming MSc , Jian Chen MD , Guo-Liang Jiang MD , Kai-Liang Wu MD, PhD , Jingfang Mao MD, PhD
{"title":"Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy with Pencil Beam Scanning for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Toxicity Profiles, Survival Outcomes, and Prognostic Indicators","authors":"Ningyi Ma MD, PhD , Xue Ming MSc , Jian Chen MD , Guo-Liang Jiang MD , Kai-Liang Wu MD, PhD , Jingfang Mao MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.01.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the toxicities and survival outcomes associated with carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) using pencil beam scanning (PBS) technique and to assess the prognostic factors for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using a local effect model (LEM)-based biological dose calculation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>This analysis included patients with stage III NSCLC (n = 181) who received CIRT between December 2016 and June 2023. CIRT was administered at a relative biological effectiveness–weighted dose of 77 Gy (range, 69-83.6 Gy) in 22 fractions (Fx) (range, 19-24 Fx). Most patients (96.1%) underwent systemic therapy before and/or after CIRT. Toxicities and survival outcomes were recorded, and statistical analyses conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median follow-up period was 18.2 months. Grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 acute toxicities were observed in 62.4%, 30.4%, 2.8%, and 0.6% of patients, respectively, with hematological toxicities accounting for all grade ≥ 3 acute toxicities. Grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 late toxicities occurred in 40.3%, 30.9%, 4.4%, and 1.7% of patients, respectively, with most grade ≥ 3 CIRT-induced late toxicities (72.7%) observed in patients receiving a CIRT dose ≥ 79.2 Gy. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 37.1 and 16.7 months, respectively. The 2-year locoregional control, OS, PFS, and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 66.1%, 64.2%, 40.3%, and 49.5%, respectively. Patients who received a CIRT dose ≤ 77 Gy had better OS (<em>P</em> = .047), but worse locoregional control compared with those who received higher doses (<em>P</em> = .026). Post-CIRT immunotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for improved OS, distant metastasis-free survival, and PFS (<em>P</em> = .002, <em>P</em> < .001, and <em>P</em> < .001, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CIRT with pencil beam scanning was effective for locally advanced NSCLC, resulting in acceptable toxicities and promising OS outcomes, particularly with doses of 69 to 77 Gy and post-CIRT immunotherapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":"122 2","pages":"Pages 383-391"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036030162500094X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the toxicities and survival outcomes associated with carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) using pencil beam scanning (PBS) technique and to assess the prognostic factors for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using a local effect model (LEM)-based biological dose calculation.
Methods and Materials
This analysis included patients with stage III NSCLC (n = 181) who received CIRT between December 2016 and June 2023. CIRT was administered at a relative biological effectiveness–weighted dose of 77 Gy (range, 69-83.6 Gy) in 22 fractions (Fx) (range, 19-24 Fx). Most patients (96.1%) underwent systemic therapy before and/or after CIRT. Toxicities and survival outcomes were recorded, and statistical analyses conducted.
Results
The median follow-up period was 18.2 months. Grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 acute toxicities were observed in 62.4%, 30.4%, 2.8%, and 0.6% of patients, respectively, with hematological toxicities accounting for all grade ≥ 3 acute toxicities. Grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 late toxicities occurred in 40.3%, 30.9%, 4.4%, and 1.7% of patients, respectively, with most grade ≥ 3 CIRT-induced late toxicities (72.7%) observed in patients receiving a CIRT dose ≥ 79.2 Gy. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 37.1 and 16.7 months, respectively. The 2-year locoregional control, OS, PFS, and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 66.1%, 64.2%, 40.3%, and 49.5%, respectively. Patients who received a CIRT dose ≤ 77 Gy had better OS (P = .047), but worse locoregional control compared with those who received higher doses (P = .026). Post-CIRT immunotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for improved OS, distant metastasis-free survival, and PFS (P = .002, P < .001, and P < .001, respectively).
Conclusions
CIRT with pencil beam scanning was effective for locally advanced NSCLC, resulting in acceptable toxicities and promising OS outcomes, particularly with doses of 69 to 77 Gy and post-CIRT immunotherapy.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field.
This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.