Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy with Pencil Beam Scanning for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Toxicity Profiles, Survival Outcomes, and Prognostic Indicators

Ningyi Ma MD, PhD , Xue Ming MSc , Jian Chen MD , Guo-Liang Jiang MD , Kai-Liang Wu MD, PhD , Jingfang Mao MD, PhD
{"title":"Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy with Pencil Beam Scanning for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Toxicity Profiles, Survival Outcomes, and Prognostic Indicators","authors":"Ningyi Ma MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Xue Ming MSc ,&nbsp;Jian Chen MD ,&nbsp;Guo-Liang Jiang MD ,&nbsp;Kai-Liang Wu MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jingfang Mao MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.01.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the toxicities and survival outcomes associated with carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) using pencil beam scanning (PBS) technique and to assess the prognostic factors for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using a local effect model (LEM)-based biological dose calculation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>This analysis included patients with stage III NSCLC (n = 181) who received CIRT between December 2016 and June 2023. CIRT was administered at a relative biological effectiveness–weighted dose of 77 Gy (range, 69-83.6 Gy) in 22 fractions (Fx) (range, 19-24 Fx). Most patients (96.1%) underwent systemic therapy before and/or after CIRT. Toxicities and survival outcomes were recorded, and statistical analyses conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median follow-up period was 18.2 months. Grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 acute toxicities were observed in 62.4%, 30.4%, 2.8%, and 0.6% of patients, respectively, with hematological toxicities accounting for all grade ≥ 3 acute toxicities. Grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 late toxicities occurred in 40.3%, 30.9%, 4.4%, and 1.7% of patients, respectively, with most grade ≥ 3 CIRT-induced late toxicities (72.7%) observed in patients receiving a CIRT dose ≥ 79.2 Gy. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 37.1 and 16.7 months, respectively. The 2-year locoregional control, OS, PFS, and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 66.1%, 64.2%, 40.3%, and 49.5%, respectively. Patients who received a CIRT dose ≤ 77 Gy had better OS (<em>P</em> = .047), but worse locoregional control compared with those who received higher doses (<em>P</em> = .026). Post-CIRT immunotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for improved OS, distant metastasis-free survival, and PFS (<em>P</em> = .002, <em>P</em> &lt; .001, and <em>P</em> &lt; .001, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CIRT with pencil beam scanning was effective for locally advanced NSCLC, resulting in acceptable toxicities and promising OS outcomes, particularly with doses of 69 to 77 Gy and post-CIRT immunotherapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":"122 2","pages":"Pages 383-391"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036030162500094X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the toxicities and survival outcomes associated with carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) using pencil beam scanning (PBS) technique and to assess the prognostic factors for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using a local effect model (LEM)-based biological dose calculation.

Methods and Materials

This analysis included patients with stage III NSCLC (n = 181) who received CIRT between December 2016 and June 2023. CIRT was administered at a relative biological effectiveness–weighted dose of 77 Gy (range, 69-83.6 Gy) in 22 fractions (Fx) (range, 19-24 Fx). Most patients (96.1%) underwent systemic therapy before and/or after CIRT. Toxicities and survival outcomes were recorded, and statistical analyses conducted.

Results

The median follow-up period was 18.2 months. Grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 acute toxicities were observed in 62.4%, 30.4%, 2.8%, and 0.6% of patients, respectively, with hematological toxicities accounting for all grade ≥ 3 acute toxicities. Grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 late toxicities occurred in 40.3%, 30.9%, 4.4%, and 1.7% of patients, respectively, with most grade ≥ 3 CIRT-induced late toxicities (72.7%) observed in patients receiving a CIRT dose ≥ 79.2 Gy. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 37.1 and 16.7 months, respectively. The 2-year locoregional control, OS, PFS, and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 66.1%, 64.2%, 40.3%, and 49.5%, respectively. Patients who received a CIRT dose ≤ 77 Gy had better OS (P = .047), but worse locoregional control compared with those who received higher doses (P = .026). Post-CIRT immunotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for improved OS, distant metastasis-free survival, and PFS (P = .002, P < .001, and P < .001, respectively).

Conclusions

CIRT with pencil beam scanning was effective for locally advanced NSCLC, resulting in acceptable toxicities and promising OS outcomes, particularly with doses of 69 to 77 Gy and post-CIRT immunotherapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
铅笔束扫描碳离子放射治疗III期非小细胞肺癌:毒性概况、生存结果和预后指标
目的:利用铅笔束扫描(PBS)评估碳离子放疗(CIRT)的毒性和生存结局,并利用基于局部效应模型(LEM)的生物剂量计算评估III期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的预后因素。方法:该分析纳入了2016年12月至2023年6月期间接受CIRT治疗的III期NSCLC患者(n = 181)。CIRT以相对生物有效性(RBE)加权剂量77 Gy(范围69-83.6 Gy)分22个分量(Fx)(范围19-24 Fx)给予。大多数患者(96.1%)在CIRT前后接受了全身治疗。记录毒性和生存结果,并进行统计分析。结果:中位随访时间为18.2个月。1级、2级、3级和4级急性毒性分别占62.4%、30.4%、2.8%和0.6%,其中血液学毒性占所有≥3级急性毒性。1级、2级、3级和4级晚期毒性分别发生在40.3%、30.9%、4.4%和1.7%的患者中,在接受CIRT剂量≥79.2 Gy的患者中观察到大多数≥3级CIRT诱导的晚期毒性(72.7%)。中位总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)分别为37.1个月和16.7个月。2年局部区域控制率(LRC)、OS、PFS和远端无转移生存率(DMFS)分别为66.1%、64.2%、40.3%和49.5%。接受CIRT剂量≤77 Gy的患者有更好的OS (p = 0.047),但与接受更高剂量的患者相比,LRC更差(p = 0.026)。cirt后免疫治疗是改善OS、DMFS和PFS的独立预后因素(p = 0.002,p < 0.001和p < 0.001)。结论:CIRT联合PBS对局部晚期NSCLC有效,产生可接受的毒性和有希望的OS结果,特别是剂量为69-77 Gy和CIRT后免疫治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
期刊最新文献
Out From the Shadows and Into the Spotlight: Making Gynecologic Brachytherapy Available and Sustainable for Patients and Providers. In Reply to Rao et al. Integration of Immune Checkpoint Blockade With Radiation in Lung Cancer: Lessons From Recent Trials. Erratum to: Karger CP, Peschke P. Species-specific methodology of RBE measurement In Regard to Denbeigh et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2025;123;1438-1439. Proton-Based Chemoradiation With Conventional Fractionation and Systemic Therapy for Failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1