Erich L Kiehl, Stavros E Mountantonakis, Moussa C Mansour, Devi G Nair, Dinesh Sharma, Tyler L Taigen, Petr Neuzil, Josef Kautzner, Jose Osorio, Andrea Natale, John D Hummel, Anish K Amin, Usman R Siddiqui, Alan Bulava, Shephal K Doshi, Chinmay P Patel, Yisachar J Greenberg, Roderick H Tung, Doron Harlev, Paul Hultz, Sophia Rosen, Kelly A van Bragt, Khaldoun G Tarakji, Vivek Y Reddy, Elad Anter
{"title":"Operator Learning Curve with a Novel Dual-Energy Lattice-tip Ablation System.","authors":"Erich L Kiehl, Stavros E Mountantonakis, Moussa C Mansour, Devi G Nair, Dinesh Sharma, Tyler L Taigen, Petr Neuzil, Josef Kautzner, Jose Osorio, Andrea Natale, John D Hummel, Anish K Amin, Usman R Siddiqui, Alan Bulava, Shephal K Doshi, Chinmay P Patel, Yisachar J Greenberg, Roderick H Tung, Doron Harlev, Paul Hultz, Sophia Rosen, Kelly A van Bragt, Khaldoun G Tarakji, Vivek Y Reddy, Elad Anter","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The SPHERE Per-AF trial demonstrated non-inferiority for a primary composite effectiveness endpoint in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients treated with a 9-mm, lattice-tip, pulsed field (PF)/radiofrequency (RF) system (74%) vs. conventional contact force-sensing RF (65%). While operators were highly experienced with the control, the vast majority were new to the investigational system.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the learning curve using this novel system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were grouped based on the sequential procedures performed per operator. Operators who performed ≤2 investigational procedures were excluded. The composite effectiveness endpoint was freedom from acute procedural failure, repeat ablation at any time, arrhythmia recurrence, drug initiation/escalation, or cardioversion each at one year excluding a 3-month blanking period. Efficiency endpoints included \"skin-to-skin\" procedure time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total cohort included 443 patients (235 investigational [31 roll-in], 208 control). Primary effectiveness in the investigational cohort improved significantly with increased procedural order. Efficacy was 65% (74/114) for the first 5 patients per operator, 75% (33/44) for patients 6-10, and 80% (60/75) for patients >10. Kaplan-Meier effectiveness estimates at one year follow-up were significantly higher in the investigational cohort after 10 procedures performed, compared to control (80% vs. 65%, p<0.05). With the investigational system, total procedure time was reduced by 25 minutes (100 vs 125) within the first 5 procedures performed (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AF ablation with a novel dual-energy, lattice-tip ablation system resulted in greater clinical efficacy compared to conventional RF after a rapid operator learning curve, with superior procedural efficiency noted from the initial procedures onward.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.02.006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The SPHERE Per-AF trial demonstrated non-inferiority for a primary composite effectiveness endpoint in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients treated with a 9-mm, lattice-tip, pulsed field (PF)/radiofrequency (RF) system (74%) vs. conventional contact force-sensing RF (65%). While operators were highly experienced with the control, the vast majority were new to the investigational system.
Objective: To assess the learning curve using this novel system.
Methods: Patients were grouped based on the sequential procedures performed per operator. Operators who performed ≤2 investigational procedures were excluded. The composite effectiveness endpoint was freedom from acute procedural failure, repeat ablation at any time, arrhythmia recurrence, drug initiation/escalation, or cardioversion each at one year excluding a 3-month blanking period. Efficiency endpoints included "skin-to-skin" procedure time.
Results: The total cohort included 443 patients (235 investigational [31 roll-in], 208 control). Primary effectiveness in the investigational cohort improved significantly with increased procedural order. Efficacy was 65% (74/114) for the first 5 patients per operator, 75% (33/44) for patients 6-10, and 80% (60/75) for patients >10. Kaplan-Meier effectiveness estimates at one year follow-up were significantly higher in the investigational cohort after 10 procedures performed, compared to control (80% vs. 65%, p<0.05). With the investigational system, total procedure time was reduced by 25 minutes (100 vs 125) within the first 5 procedures performed (p<0.001).
Conclusion: AF ablation with a novel dual-energy, lattice-tip ablation system resulted in greater clinical efficacy compared to conventional RF after a rapid operator learning curve, with superior procedural efficiency noted from the initial procedures onward.
期刊介绍:
HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability.
HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community.
The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.