Operator Learning Curve with a Novel Dual-Energy Lattice-tip Ablation System.

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart rhythm Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.02.006
Erich L Kiehl, Stavros E Mountantonakis, Moussa C Mansour, Devi G Nair, Dinesh Sharma, Tyler L Taigen, Petr Neuzil, Josef Kautzner, Jose Osorio, Andrea Natale, John D Hummel, Anish K Amin, Usman R Siddiqui, Alan Bulava, Shephal K Doshi, Chinmay P Patel, Yisachar J Greenberg, Roderick H Tung, Doron Harlev, Paul Hultz, Sophia Rosen, Kelly A van Bragt, Khaldoun G Tarakji, Vivek Y Reddy, Elad Anter
{"title":"Operator Learning Curve with a Novel Dual-Energy Lattice-tip Ablation System.","authors":"Erich L Kiehl, Stavros E Mountantonakis, Moussa C Mansour, Devi G Nair, Dinesh Sharma, Tyler L Taigen, Petr Neuzil, Josef Kautzner, Jose Osorio, Andrea Natale, John D Hummel, Anish K Amin, Usman R Siddiqui, Alan Bulava, Shephal K Doshi, Chinmay P Patel, Yisachar J Greenberg, Roderick H Tung, Doron Harlev, Paul Hultz, Sophia Rosen, Kelly A van Bragt, Khaldoun G Tarakji, Vivek Y Reddy, Elad Anter","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The SPHERE Per-AF trial demonstrated non-inferiority for a primary composite effectiveness endpoint in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients treated with a 9-mm, lattice-tip, pulsed field (PF)/radiofrequency (RF) system (74%) vs. conventional contact force-sensing RF (65%). While operators were highly experienced with the control, the vast majority were new to the investigational system.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the learning curve using this novel system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were grouped based on the sequential procedures performed per operator. Operators who performed ≤2 investigational procedures were excluded. The composite effectiveness endpoint was freedom from acute procedural failure, repeat ablation at any time, arrhythmia recurrence, drug initiation/escalation, or cardioversion each at one year excluding a 3-month blanking period. Efficiency endpoints included \"skin-to-skin\" procedure time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total cohort included 443 patients (235 investigational [31 roll-in], 208 control). Primary effectiveness in the investigational cohort improved significantly with increased procedural order. Efficacy was 65% (74/114) for the first 5 patients per operator, 75% (33/44) for patients 6-10, and 80% (60/75) for patients >10. Kaplan-Meier effectiveness estimates at one year follow-up were significantly higher in the investigational cohort after 10 procedures performed, compared to control (80% vs. 65%, p<0.05). With the investigational system, total procedure time was reduced by 25 minutes (100 vs 125) within the first 5 procedures performed (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AF ablation with a novel dual-energy, lattice-tip ablation system resulted in greater clinical efficacy compared to conventional RF after a rapid operator learning curve, with superior procedural efficiency noted from the initial procedures onward.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.02.006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The SPHERE Per-AF trial demonstrated non-inferiority for a primary composite effectiveness endpoint in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients treated with a 9-mm, lattice-tip, pulsed field (PF)/radiofrequency (RF) system (74%) vs. conventional contact force-sensing RF (65%). While operators were highly experienced with the control, the vast majority were new to the investigational system.

Objective: To assess the learning curve using this novel system.

Methods: Patients were grouped based on the sequential procedures performed per operator. Operators who performed ≤2 investigational procedures were excluded. The composite effectiveness endpoint was freedom from acute procedural failure, repeat ablation at any time, arrhythmia recurrence, drug initiation/escalation, or cardioversion each at one year excluding a 3-month blanking period. Efficiency endpoints included "skin-to-skin" procedure time.

Results: The total cohort included 443 patients (235 investigational [31 roll-in], 208 control). Primary effectiveness in the investigational cohort improved significantly with increased procedural order. Efficacy was 65% (74/114) for the first 5 patients per operator, 75% (33/44) for patients 6-10, and 80% (60/75) for patients >10. Kaplan-Meier effectiveness estimates at one year follow-up were significantly higher in the investigational cohort after 10 procedures performed, compared to control (80% vs. 65%, p<0.05). With the investigational system, total procedure time was reduced by 25 minutes (100 vs 125) within the first 5 procedures performed (p<0.001).

Conclusion: AF ablation with a novel dual-energy, lattice-tip ablation system resulted in greater clinical efficacy compared to conventional RF after a rapid operator learning curve, with superior procedural efficiency noted from the initial procedures onward.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart rhythm
Heart rhythm 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.50%
发文量
1465
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability. HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community. The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.
期刊最新文献
Decreased Left Ventricular Systolic Function during the Late Phase after Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Of course it's about scar. Operator Learning Curve with a Novel Dual-Energy Lattice-tip Ablation System. Predicting Pacemaker Implantation After TAVI In Patients With Right Bundle Branch Block: One Must Imagine Sisyphus Happy. Sex Differences in Atrial Remodeling and Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1