{"title":"Decreased left ventricular systolic function during the late phase after response to cardiac resynchronization therapy","authors":"Tomoya Iwawaki MD , Yasuya Inden MD, PhD , Satoshi Yanagisawa MD, PhD , Kiichi Miyamae MD , Hiroyuki Miyazawa MD , Takayuki Goto MD , Shun Kondo MD , Masaya Tachi MD , Masafumi Shimojo MD , Yukiomi Tsuji MD, PhD , Toyoaki Murohara MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><span>Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves cardiac function in patients with heart failure (HF) and dyssynchrony. However, a subset of responders develops a delayed decline in left ventricular (LV) </span>systolic function, referred to as “delayed negative reverse remodeling (DNRR).”</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and prognosis of DNRR in CRT responders.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>A total of 203 patients undergoing CRT device implantation were analyzed. Among them, 100 responders were identified on the basis of a ≥5% absolute LV ejection fraction (LVEF) increase and a ≥15% relative LV end-systolic volume reduction at 6 months after CRT device implantation. </span><em>DNRR</em><span> was defined as a ≥5% absolute decrease in LVEF at 1 year after treatment response determination.</span></div></div><div><h3>ResultS</h3><div><span>Of the responders, 22 (22.0%) exhibited DNRR, while 78 (78.0%) were classified as non-DNRR. The DNRR group showed a decline in LVEF from 41.2%±8.3% to 32.7%±9.6% (</span><em>P</em><.001), while the non-DNRR group showed improvement from 42.8%±9.5% to 46.2%±10.5% (<em>P</em><span><.001). Multivariate analysis identified LV end-systolic volume ≥ 100 mL (odds ratio [OR] 3.575; </span><em>P</em><span>=.041), paced QRS duration ≥ 150 ms (OR 4.427; </span><em>P</em><span>=.023), synchronized LV pacing rate < 85% (OR 5.753; </span><em>P</em><span>=.043) at 6 months after CRT device implantation, and intraventricular conduction disturbance (OR 5.593; </span><em>P</em>=.018) as independent predictors of DNRR. The DNRR group had significantly worse outcomes, including cardiac death and HF-related hospitalization, than did the non-DNRR group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite an initial response to CRT, a subset of patients with HF developed DNRR, which correlated with worse clinical outcomes. Identifying risk factors associated with DNRR may help optimize CRT management and improve long-term patient care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":"23 1","pages":"Pages 149-157"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527125001158","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves cardiac function in patients with heart failure (HF) and dyssynchrony. However, a subset of responders develops a delayed decline in left ventricular (LV) systolic function, referred to as “delayed negative reverse remodeling (DNRR).”
Objective
This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and prognosis of DNRR in CRT responders.
Methods
A total of 203 patients undergoing CRT device implantation were analyzed. Among them, 100 responders were identified on the basis of a ≥5% absolute LV ejection fraction (LVEF) increase and a ≥15% relative LV end-systolic volume reduction at 6 months after CRT device implantation. DNRR was defined as a ≥5% absolute decrease in LVEF at 1 year after treatment response determination.
ResultS
Of the responders, 22 (22.0%) exhibited DNRR, while 78 (78.0%) were classified as non-DNRR. The DNRR group showed a decline in LVEF from 41.2%±8.3% to 32.7%±9.6% (P<.001), while the non-DNRR group showed improvement from 42.8%±9.5% to 46.2%±10.5% (P<.001). Multivariate analysis identified LV end-systolic volume ≥ 100 mL (odds ratio [OR] 3.575; P=.041), paced QRS duration ≥ 150 ms (OR 4.427; P=.023), synchronized LV pacing rate < 85% (OR 5.753; P=.043) at 6 months after CRT device implantation, and intraventricular conduction disturbance (OR 5.593; P=.018) as independent predictors of DNRR. The DNRR group had significantly worse outcomes, including cardiac death and HF-related hospitalization, than did the non-DNRR group.
Conclusion
Despite an initial response to CRT, a subset of patients with HF developed DNRR, which correlated with worse clinical outcomes. Identifying risk factors associated with DNRR may help optimize CRT management and improve long-term patient care.
期刊介绍:
HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability.
HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community.
The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.