William Berthelot, Caroline Sirois, Anne-Sophie Julien, Nathalie Amiable, Louis Bessette, Philippe Desaulniers, Marie-Claude Audet, Sonia Lagacé, Paul R Fortin
{"title":"The association between polypharmacy and disease control in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus: a cohort study.","authors":"William Berthelot, Caroline Sirois, Anne-Sophie Julien, Nathalie Amiable, Louis Bessette, Philippe Desaulniers, Marie-Claude Audet, Sonia Lagacé, Paul R Fortin","doi":"10.1007/s00296-025-05804-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Polypharmacy can be associated with poor outcomes in chronic diseases. Our objective is to determine the prevalence of polypharmacy and its association with disease control in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). An observational study was conducted using the SARD database of the CHU de Québec. Participants newly diagnosed with RA or SLE enrolled in the database after 24 months were included. Collected data included number and type of medications, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and medication adherence (proportion of days covered during the first 180 days). Polypharmacy was defined as the simultaneous use ≥5 medications. Multivariable logistic and linear regressions were used to determine the association between polypharmacy and disease control (DAS28CRP, SLEDAI-2 K). The study included 111 participants (RA = 81; SLE = 30). Medication count increased at two years in RA (mean ± SD): 4.6 ± 3.3 to 6.9 ± 3.6; and SLE: 6.5 ± 4.6 to 7.80 ± 4.82. Polypharmacy prevalence increased at two years: RA: from 43 to 74%; SLE: from 47 to 73%. Mean medication adherence exceeded 85%. For RA participants, polypharmacy was associated with a better DAS28CRP score at one year [adjusted odds ratio of achieving a poor outcome: 0.17 (95%CI 0.04-0.71)], but this association was lost at two years [2.88 (0.45-18.29)]. For SLE, polypharmacy was not associated with disease activity based on the SLEDAI-2 K at one year [7.36 (0.26-211.16)] or two years [0.32 (0.05-1.99)]. Overall, polypharmacy is very prevalent in RA and SLE and could be positively associated with the level of disease control in the year after a diagnosis of RA.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 3","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05804-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Polypharmacy can be associated with poor outcomes in chronic diseases. Our objective is to determine the prevalence of polypharmacy and its association with disease control in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). An observational study was conducted using the SARD database of the CHU de Québec. Participants newly diagnosed with RA or SLE enrolled in the database after 24 months were included. Collected data included number and type of medications, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and medication adherence (proportion of days covered during the first 180 days). Polypharmacy was defined as the simultaneous use ≥5 medications. Multivariable logistic and linear regressions were used to determine the association between polypharmacy and disease control (DAS28CRP, SLEDAI-2 K). The study included 111 participants (RA = 81; SLE = 30). Medication count increased at two years in RA (mean ± SD): 4.6 ± 3.3 to 6.9 ± 3.6; and SLE: 6.5 ± 4.6 to 7.80 ± 4.82. Polypharmacy prevalence increased at two years: RA: from 43 to 74%; SLE: from 47 to 73%. Mean medication adherence exceeded 85%. For RA participants, polypharmacy was associated with a better DAS28CRP score at one year [adjusted odds ratio of achieving a poor outcome: 0.17 (95%CI 0.04-0.71)], but this association was lost at two years [2.88 (0.45-18.29)]. For SLE, polypharmacy was not associated with disease activity based on the SLEDAI-2 K at one year [7.36 (0.26-211.16)] or two years [0.32 (0.05-1.99)]. Overall, polypharmacy is very prevalent in RA and SLE and could be positively associated with the level of disease control in the year after a diagnosis of RA.
期刊介绍:
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology.
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.