Radiation dose at the eye lens of patients undergoing radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiological Physics and Technology Pub Date : 2025-02-09 DOI:10.1007/s12194-025-00886-2
Panatsada Awikunprasert, Jumneanphan Rueansri, Kittipong Suangamiam, Chaknarin Koedsawat, Surasak Tamon, Nattakarn Kittiva, Tanapol Dachviriyakij
{"title":"Radiation dose at the eye lens of patients undergoing radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.","authors":"Panatsada Awikunprasert, Jumneanphan Rueansri, Kittipong Suangamiam, Chaknarin Koedsawat, Surasak Tamon, Nattakarn Kittiva, Tanapol Dachviriyakij","doi":"10.1007/s12194-025-00886-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Linear accelerator irradiation, the most common treatment for head and neck cancer, requires accurate prediction of lens radiation doses to ensure patient safety. The eye lens, being highly radiosensitive and vulnerable to scattered radiation, is at increased risk of developing cataracts. This study compared radiation doses calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS) with those measured in vivo using optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters placed on the eyes of 18 patients undergoing radiotherapy for various head and neck cancers. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the agreement between the two methods. The results showed that TPS-calculated doses were significantly higher than OSL-measured doses, with TPS values averaging twice as high. However, in three cases, the measured OSL doses exceeded the TPS predictions. The Bland-Altman plot revealed poor agreement between the two methods. The mean doses to the left and right eye lenses were 182 cGy and 170 cGy, respectively, with the highest recorded doses being 492 cGy for the left eye and 513 cGy for the right eye. Patients with nasopharyngeal cancer received the highest doses, and four patients had doses in the 3-5 Gy range, increasing their risk of cataracts. These findings emphasize the importance of validating TPS accuracy in clinical practice to ensure optimal patient care. Further research is necessary to explore the discrepancies between dose measurements and enhance TPS precision, improving clinical outcomes and patient safety in radiation therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-025-00886-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Linear accelerator irradiation, the most common treatment for head and neck cancer, requires accurate prediction of lens radiation doses to ensure patient safety. The eye lens, being highly radiosensitive and vulnerable to scattered radiation, is at increased risk of developing cataracts. This study compared radiation doses calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS) with those measured in vivo using optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters placed on the eyes of 18 patients undergoing radiotherapy for various head and neck cancers. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the agreement between the two methods. The results showed that TPS-calculated doses were significantly higher than OSL-measured doses, with TPS values averaging twice as high. However, in three cases, the measured OSL doses exceeded the TPS predictions. The Bland-Altman plot revealed poor agreement between the two methods. The mean doses to the left and right eye lenses were 182 cGy and 170 cGy, respectively, with the highest recorded doses being 492 cGy for the left eye and 513 cGy for the right eye. Patients with nasopharyngeal cancer received the highest doses, and four patients had doses in the 3-5 Gy range, increasing their risk of cataracts. These findings emphasize the importance of validating TPS accuracy in clinical practice to ensure optimal patient care. Further research is necessary to explore the discrepancies between dose measurements and enhance TPS precision, improving clinical outcomes and patient safety in radiation therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
期刊最新文献
Radiation dose at the eye lens of patients undergoing radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. Proposal of a hybrid dosimetry method for improving work efficiency in CT dose management. Selection of Radiological Physics and Technology Awards 2024. Age-related sensitivity deterioration evaluation of positron emission tomography utilizing cross-calibration factor measurement data. Peripheral dose assessment in radiation therapy using photon beams: experimental results with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1