Remote online learning reimagined: perceptions and experiences of medical students in a post-pandemic world.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-06815-6
Mohammed Seed Ahmed, Abderrezzaq Soltani, Daniel Zahra, Soumaya Allouch, Rafif Mahmood Al Saady, Amre Nasr, Nada Saleh, Amir Saeed, Khalid A Awad, Sally A Baraka, Osman Ahmed, Rasha Babiker, Elmuataz E A Mohammed, Kamran Ali
{"title":"Remote online learning reimagined: perceptions and experiences of medical students in a post-pandemic world.","authors":"Mohammed Seed Ahmed, Abderrezzaq Soltani, Daniel Zahra, Soumaya Allouch, Rafif Mahmood Al Saady, Amre Nasr, Nada Saleh, Amir Saeed, Khalid A Awad, Sally A Baraka, Osman Ahmed, Rasha Babiker, Elmuataz E A Mohammed, Kamran Ali","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-06815-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blended learning is a key educational methodology, particularly in medical education, and involves integration of online and face-to-face interactions to enhance flexibility and engagement. Blended learning gained increased popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic due to social restrictions. Following control of the pandemic, face to face teaching and learning activities have been restored. However, some institutions continue to deliver some teaching online. This study explores the perceptions and experiences of undergraduate medical students from 15 institutions across seven countries regarding remote online learning in the post-pandemic era.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study utilized an online survey to gather insights into the use of learning resources, interactivity in online sessions, barriers to online learning, and preferences for learning modalities. Descriptive data were summarized by frequency, categorical comparisons were assessed with chi-squared tests, and t-tests were used for continuous data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings of the current study show a general preference for blended learning (47.78%) over traditional face-to-face instruction (41.48%). Key benefits of blended learning reported by the participants by comfort, flexibility, reduced travel, and ability to learn at own pace. The key barriers identified were internet connectivity issues and family distractions. The study also highlighted the limitations of online learning in replacing clinical experience and practical skills acquisition, with 69.26% of respondents affirming that online learning does not sufficiently substitute for direct patient contact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings underscore the importance of integrating face to face and remote online teaching and learning frameworks to align with educational objectives, particularly in fostering interactivity and practical skill development. The study suggests that while blended learning has many benefits, its effectiveness is highly context-dependent and requires thoughtful implementation to meet the diverse needs of medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"215"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812175/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06815-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Blended learning is a key educational methodology, particularly in medical education, and involves integration of online and face-to-face interactions to enhance flexibility and engagement. Blended learning gained increased popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic due to social restrictions. Following control of the pandemic, face to face teaching and learning activities have been restored. However, some institutions continue to deliver some teaching online. This study explores the perceptions and experiences of undergraduate medical students from 15 institutions across seven countries regarding remote online learning in the post-pandemic era.

Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized an online survey to gather insights into the use of learning resources, interactivity in online sessions, barriers to online learning, and preferences for learning modalities. Descriptive data were summarized by frequency, categorical comparisons were assessed with chi-squared tests, and t-tests were used for continuous data.

Results: The findings of the current study show a general preference for blended learning (47.78%) over traditional face-to-face instruction (41.48%). Key benefits of blended learning reported by the participants by comfort, flexibility, reduced travel, and ability to learn at own pace. The key barriers identified were internet connectivity issues and family distractions. The study also highlighted the limitations of online learning in replacing clinical experience and practical skills acquisition, with 69.26% of respondents affirming that online learning does not sufficiently substitute for direct patient contact.

Conclusion: The findings underscore the importance of integrating face to face and remote online teaching and learning frameworks to align with educational objectives, particularly in fostering interactivity and practical skill development. The study suggests that while blended learning has many benefits, its effectiveness is highly context-dependent and requires thoughtful implementation to meet the diverse needs of medical education.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新构想远程在线学习:大流行后世界医学生的看法和经验。
背景:混合学习是一种关键的教育方法,特别是在医学教育中,它涉及在线和面对面互动的整合,以提高灵活性和参与度。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,由于社会限制,混合式学习越来越受欢迎。随着疫情的控制,面对面的教学活动已经恢复。然而,一些机构继续提供一些在线教学。本研究探讨了来自7个国家15所院校的医科本科生在后大流行时代对远程在线学习的看法和经历。方法:这项横断面研究利用在线调查来收集学习资源的使用情况、在线课程的互动性、在线学习的障碍以及对学习方式的偏好。描述性资料按频次汇总,分类比较采用卡方检验,连续资料采用t检验。结果:目前的研究结果显示,与传统的面对面教学(41.48%)相比,混合学习(47.78%)更受欢迎。参与者报告的混合学习的主要好处是舒适、灵活、减少旅行和按自己的节奏学习的能力。确定的主要障碍是互联网连接问题和家庭干扰。该研究还强调了在线学习在取代临床经验和实践技能获取方面的局限性,69.26%的受访者肯定在线学习不能充分取代直接与患者接触。结论:研究结果强调了整合面对面和远程在线教学框架以配合教育目标的重要性,特别是在促进互动性和实践技能发展方面。该研究表明,虽然混合式学习有很多好处,但其有效性是高度依赖于环境的,需要深思熟虑的实施,以满足医学教育的多样化需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
Medical students' perceptions of online versus physical teaching methods in southern Nigeria: a post covid-19 pandemic cross-sectional pilot study. Integrating the Triple Jump Exercise and gamification (G-Jump) to enhance learning outcomes among anesthesia students: a preliminary quasi-experimental study. Structured, merit-based selection of radiology chief residents; a single center experience. From image to clinical judgment: a randomized near-peer teaching trial on systematic chest radiograph interpretation. Construction and practice of a certification system for clinical nursing preceptors: a " license to teach" approach in China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1