Integrating urban building energy modeling (UBEM) and urban-building environmental impact assessment (UB-EIA) for sustainable urban development: A comprehensive review
{"title":"Integrating urban building energy modeling (UBEM) and urban-building environmental impact assessment (UB-EIA) for sustainable urban development: A comprehensive review","authors":"Yang Li, Haibo Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rapid urbanization has increased energy demand and environmental impacts in urban buildings, highlighting the need to understand building interactions and energy transfer. This has led to various methodologies for large-scale building assessment, such as Urban Building Energy Modeling (UBEM) and Urban-Building Environmental Impact Assessment (UB-EIA). Both have been separately and widely studied to support urban planning and building design, develop sustainable and smart cities, and enable stakeholders to optimize resource use and make informed decisions. However, a detailed comparative analysis of various UBEM and UB-EIA methodologies and their integrations have not been thoroughly reviewed in current existing research. To fill this research gap, this comprehensive review systematically investigated 157 articles to understand the evolution, methodologies, challenges of UBEM and UB-EIA. This review provides a holistic understanding, highlighting complementary strengths and identifying opportunities for integration to enhance urban building sustainability assessments. The findings of the review found that integrating UBEM and UB-EIA holds significant potential for enhancing urban sustainability usually through a comprehensive, data-driven approach. UBEM can serve as a foundation for UB-EIA by using similar data and methods, improving validation, and addressing gaps. UB-EIA's reliance on Building Information Management (BIM) can be enhanced by UBEM's detailed 2D and 3D models for precise EIA. This integration fosters more informed decision-making, promoting resilient and sustainable urban development by accurately reflecting complex urban interactions. Further research should explore the social and economic impacts of urban buildings using integrated UBEM and UB-EIA strategies for thorough and robust assessments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 115471"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125001443","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rapid urbanization has increased energy demand and environmental impacts in urban buildings, highlighting the need to understand building interactions and energy transfer. This has led to various methodologies for large-scale building assessment, such as Urban Building Energy Modeling (UBEM) and Urban-Building Environmental Impact Assessment (UB-EIA). Both have been separately and widely studied to support urban planning and building design, develop sustainable and smart cities, and enable stakeholders to optimize resource use and make informed decisions. However, a detailed comparative analysis of various UBEM and UB-EIA methodologies and their integrations have not been thoroughly reviewed in current existing research. To fill this research gap, this comprehensive review systematically investigated 157 articles to understand the evolution, methodologies, challenges of UBEM and UB-EIA. This review provides a holistic understanding, highlighting complementary strengths and identifying opportunities for integration to enhance urban building sustainability assessments. The findings of the review found that integrating UBEM and UB-EIA holds significant potential for enhancing urban sustainability usually through a comprehensive, data-driven approach. UBEM can serve as a foundation for UB-EIA by using similar data and methods, improving validation, and addressing gaps. UB-EIA's reliance on Building Information Management (BIM) can be enhanced by UBEM's detailed 2D and 3D models for precise EIA. This integration fosters more informed decision-making, promoting resilient and sustainable urban development by accurately reflecting complex urban interactions. Further research should explore the social and economic impacts of urban buildings using integrated UBEM and UB-EIA strategies for thorough and robust assessments.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.