Does polycentric climate governance drive the circular economy? Evidence from subnational spending and dematerialization of production in the EU

IF 6.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Economics Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108533
Francisco Mango , Rose Camille Vincent
{"title":"Does polycentric climate governance drive the circular economy? Evidence from subnational spending and dematerialization of production in the EU","authors":"Francisco Mango ,&nbsp;Rose Camille Vincent","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Subnational governments have progressively raised their share in the global flow of resources, knowledge, and standard-setting power to combat climate change, leveraging the channels of transnational networks and commitments to carbon neutrality, often exceeding the ambitions of central administrations. This paper explores whether polycentric climate governance, characterized by overlapping decision-making across governance levels, accelerates the transition to the circular economy. Using a novel dataset on SNG climate expenditures spanning 30 European countries from 2001 to 2019, we assess their impact on resource productivity (RP)—a key indicator of the circular economy, defined as GDP per kilogram of raw material consumption. The analysis employs a Panel-Corrected Standard Errors (PCSE) model to address heteroskedasticity, serial correlation, and cross-sectional dependence. To further ensure robustness, we implement instrumental variable techniques (IV-GMM), leveraging geographical fragmentation and climatic variation to address potential endogeneity. The results demonstrate that SNG climate-sensitive expenditures significantly enhance RP, with every $100 increase in per capita spending leading to measurable improvements in resource efficiency. In contrast, CG spending exhibits limited or even negative effects on RP, underscoring the unique capacity of SNGs to foster economic dematerialization. Mechanisms driving these effects include investments in waste management, energy, and transport systems, where SNGs outperform CGs in fostering localized and tailored solutions. These findings highlight the importance of empowering SNGs within polycentric governance frameworks to advance the circular economy and achieve sustainable growth. The study contributes to the literature by offering one of the first empirical analyses linking SNG spending to the circular economy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 108533"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925000163","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Subnational governments have progressively raised their share in the global flow of resources, knowledge, and standard-setting power to combat climate change, leveraging the channels of transnational networks and commitments to carbon neutrality, often exceeding the ambitions of central administrations. This paper explores whether polycentric climate governance, characterized by overlapping decision-making across governance levels, accelerates the transition to the circular economy. Using a novel dataset on SNG climate expenditures spanning 30 European countries from 2001 to 2019, we assess their impact on resource productivity (RP)—a key indicator of the circular economy, defined as GDP per kilogram of raw material consumption. The analysis employs a Panel-Corrected Standard Errors (PCSE) model to address heteroskedasticity, serial correlation, and cross-sectional dependence. To further ensure robustness, we implement instrumental variable techniques (IV-GMM), leveraging geographical fragmentation and climatic variation to address potential endogeneity. The results demonstrate that SNG climate-sensitive expenditures significantly enhance RP, with every $100 increase in per capita spending leading to measurable improvements in resource efficiency. In contrast, CG spending exhibits limited or even negative effects on RP, underscoring the unique capacity of SNGs to foster economic dematerialization. Mechanisms driving these effects include investments in waste management, energy, and transport systems, where SNGs outperform CGs in fostering localized and tailored solutions. These findings highlight the importance of empowering SNGs within polycentric governance frameworks to advance the circular economy and achieve sustainable growth. The study contributes to the literature by offering one of the first empirical analyses linking SNG spending to the circular economy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多中心气候治理能否推动循环经济?来自欧盟次国家支出和非物质化生产的证据
地方政府利用跨国网络的渠道和对碳中和的承诺,逐步提高了它们在应对气候变化的资源、知识和标准制定权力的全球流动中的份额,往往超出了中央政府的雄心。本文探讨了多中心气候治理是否加速了向循环经济的过渡,其特征是跨治理层次的重叠决策。我们使用2001年至2019年30个欧洲国家的煤制天然气气候支出新数据集,评估了它们对资源生产率(RP)的影响,RP是循环经济的一个关键指标,定义为每公斤原材料消耗的GDP。分析采用面板校正标准误差(PCSE)模型来处理异方差、序列相关性和横截面依赖性。为了进一步确保稳健性,我们实施了工具变量技术(IV-GMM),利用地理碎片化和气候变化来解决潜在的内生性问题。结果表明,对天然气气候敏感的支出显著提高了RP,人均支出每增加100美元,就会导致资源效率的显著提高。相比之下,CG支出对RP的影响有限,甚至是负面的,这强调了sng促进经济非物质化的独特能力。推动这些影响的机制包括对废物管理、能源和运输系统的投资,在这些领域,天然气在促进本地化和量身定制解决方案方面优于天然气。这些研究结果强调了在多中心治理框架内增强天然气发电能力对推动循环经济和实现可持续增长的重要性。该研究通过提供将天然气消费与循环经济联系起来的首批实证分析之一,为文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
期刊最新文献
Designing a reserve system with heterogeneous sites: Extending the SLOSS debate from an economic perspective Bridging beyond GDP and degrowth: Identifying measurements that are fit for future The Afnan Equilibrium: A Coupled Welfare Model for Balancing Technology, Resilience, and Externalities Comparing apples to apples: Evidence of convergent validity between contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments Frontier technology adoption and inclusive green growth in the EU: A double-edged sword?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1