{"title":"Does polycentric climate governance drive the circular economy? Evidence from subnational spending and dematerialization of production in the EU","authors":"Francisco Mango , Rose Camille Vincent","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Subnational governments have progressively raised their share in the global flow of resources, knowledge, and standard-setting power to combat climate change, leveraging the channels of transnational networks and commitments to carbon neutrality, often exceeding the ambitions of central administrations. This paper explores whether polycentric climate governance, characterized by overlapping decision-making across governance levels, accelerates the transition to the circular economy. Using a novel dataset on SNG climate expenditures spanning 30 European countries from 2001 to 2019, we assess their impact on resource productivity (RP)—a key indicator of the circular economy, defined as GDP per kilogram of raw material consumption. The analysis employs a Panel-Corrected Standard Errors (PCSE) model to address heteroskedasticity, serial correlation, and cross-sectional dependence. To further ensure robustness, we implement instrumental variable techniques (IV-GMM), leveraging geographical fragmentation and climatic variation to address potential endogeneity. The results demonstrate that SNG climate-sensitive expenditures significantly enhance RP, with every $100 increase in per capita spending leading to measurable improvements in resource efficiency. In contrast, CG spending exhibits limited or even negative effects on RP, underscoring the unique capacity of SNGs to foster economic dematerialization. Mechanisms driving these effects include investments in waste management, energy, and transport systems, where SNGs outperform CGs in fostering localized and tailored solutions. These findings highlight the importance of empowering SNGs within polycentric governance frameworks to advance the circular economy and achieve sustainable growth. The study contributes to the literature by offering one of the first empirical analyses linking SNG spending to the circular economy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 108533"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925000163","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Subnational governments have progressively raised their share in the global flow of resources, knowledge, and standard-setting power to combat climate change, leveraging the channels of transnational networks and commitments to carbon neutrality, often exceeding the ambitions of central administrations. This paper explores whether polycentric climate governance, characterized by overlapping decision-making across governance levels, accelerates the transition to the circular economy. Using a novel dataset on SNG climate expenditures spanning 30 European countries from 2001 to 2019, we assess their impact on resource productivity (RP)—a key indicator of the circular economy, defined as GDP per kilogram of raw material consumption. The analysis employs a Panel-Corrected Standard Errors (PCSE) model to address heteroskedasticity, serial correlation, and cross-sectional dependence. To further ensure robustness, we implement instrumental variable techniques (IV-GMM), leveraging geographical fragmentation and climatic variation to address potential endogeneity. The results demonstrate that SNG climate-sensitive expenditures significantly enhance RP, with every $100 increase in per capita spending leading to measurable improvements in resource efficiency. In contrast, CG spending exhibits limited or even negative effects on RP, underscoring the unique capacity of SNGs to foster economic dematerialization. Mechanisms driving these effects include investments in waste management, energy, and transport systems, where SNGs outperform CGs in fostering localized and tailored solutions. These findings highlight the importance of empowering SNGs within polycentric governance frameworks to advance the circular economy and achieve sustainable growth. The study contributes to the literature by offering one of the first empirical analyses linking SNG spending to the circular economy.
期刊介绍:
Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership.
Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.