Understanding agricultural market dynamics in times of crisis: The dynamic agent-based network model Agrimate

IF 6.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Economics Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108546
Kilian Kuhla, Patryk Kubiczek, Christian Otto
{"title":"Understanding agricultural market dynamics in times of crisis: The dynamic agent-based network model Agrimate","authors":"Kilian Kuhla,&nbsp;Patryk Kubiczek,&nbsp;Christian Otto","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The concentration of crop production in a few global breadbaskets and strong import dependencies of many developing countries render global grain markets susceptible to systemic shocks from weather- or conflict-induced supply failures. Often amplified by unilateral policy responses, such as export restrictions, the resulting short-term risks to global food security are substantial but insufficiently captured by established modeling approaches. Here, we present <em>Agrimate</em>, a dynamic agent-based agricultural market model. Explicitly accounting for commercial and strategic stockholding, and endogenously modeling supply- and demand-side responses, <em>Agrimate</em> describes the spreading of supply failures in international grain trade networks and associated price effects with high temporal resolution. For the major food grain wheat, we show that <em>Agrimate</em> can quantitatively reproduce monthly world market price hikes and annual changes in regional supply, consumption, and stocks during the 2007/08 and 2010/11 world food crises. Further, we study potential food security risks arising from multi-breadbasket failures. We find that in a <span><math><mrow><mo>+</mo><mn>2</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>°</mo><mi>C</mi></mrow></math></span>world, the risk of severe (90th percentile) price hikes more than doubles, while the risk of severe regional consumption losses increases by up to 130%, compared to 2006–2015 climate conditions. Our modeling shows that <em>Agrimate</em> can provide policy-relevant insights into the spreading of food security risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 108546"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925000291","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concentration of crop production in a few global breadbaskets and strong import dependencies of many developing countries render global grain markets susceptible to systemic shocks from weather- or conflict-induced supply failures. Often amplified by unilateral policy responses, such as export restrictions, the resulting short-term risks to global food security are substantial but insufficiently captured by established modeling approaches. Here, we present Agrimate, a dynamic agent-based agricultural market model. Explicitly accounting for commercial and strategic stockholding, and endogenously modeling supply- and demand-side responses, Agrimate describes the spreading of supply failures in international grain trade networks and associated price effects with high temporal resolution. For the major food grain wheat, we show that Agrimate can quantitatively reproduce monthly world market price hikes and annual changes in regional supply, consumption, and stocks during the 2007/08 and 2010/11 world food crises. Further, we study potential food security risks arising from multi-breadbasket failures. We find that in a +2°Cworld, the risk of severe (90th percentile) price hikes more than doubles, while the risk of severe regional consumption losses increases by up to 130%, compared to 2006–2015 climate conditions. Our modeling shows that Agrimate can provide policy-relevant insights into the spreading of food security risks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危机时期理解农业市场动态:基于动态代理的网络模型Agrimate
作物生产集中在少数几个全球产粮区以及许多发展中国家严重依赖进口,使全球粮食市场容易受到天气或冲突导致的供应中断的系统性冲击。出口限制等单边政策反应往往会放大这一风险,由此对全球粮食安全造成的短期风险是巨大的,但现有的建模方法无法充分反映这一风险。在这里,我们提出了一个动态的基于主体的农业市场模型Agrimate。Agrimate明确地考虑了商业和战略储备,并内生地模拟了供给侧和需求侧的反应,以高时间分辨率描述了国际粮食贸易网络中供应失败的蔓延以及相关的价格效应。对于主要粮食谷物小麦,我们表明Agrimate可以定量再现2007/08年和2010/11年世界粮食危机期间世界市场价格的月度上涨和区域供应、消费和库存的年度变化。此外,我们还研究了多个粮仓失效所带来的潜在粮食安全风险。我们发现,与2006-2015年的气候条件相比,在+2°c的世界中,严重(第90百分位)价格上涨的风险增加了一倍以上,而严重的区域消费损失风险增加了130%。我们的模型表明,Agrimate可以为粮食安全风险的传播提供与政策相关的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to ‘Integrating post-growth economics into transformative adaptation: Property relations, capital, and democratic planning’ [Ecological Economics (2026) Volume 242 108895] Beyond the chain: Lead firm strategies and sustainability governance in the global coffee sector Managing shade trees, balancing trade-offs: Effects of shade-tree density on economic performance of Brazilian cocoa agroforests GDP alternatives revisited: A systematic review and thematic analysis of barriers to the adoption of alternative measures of economic progress Multilevel drivers of smallholder farmers' coping strategies to climate variability: Insights from Assam, India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1