{"title":"Understanding agricultural market dynamics in times of crisis: The dynamic agent-based network model Agrimate","authors":"Kilian Kuhla, Patryk Kubiczek, Christian Otto","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The concentration of crop production in a few global breadbaskets and strong import dependencies of many developing countries render global grain markets susceptible to systemic shocks from weather- or conflict-induced supply failures. Often amplified by unilateral policy responses, such as export restrictions, the resulting short-term risks to global food security are substantial but insufficiently captured by established modeling approaches. Here, we present <em>Agrimate</em>, a dynamic agent-based agricultural market model. Explicitly accounting for commercial and strategic stockholding, and endogenously modeling supply- and demand-side responses, <em>Agrimate</em> describes the spreading of supply failures in international grain trade networks and associated price effects with high temporal resolution. For the major food grain wheat, we show that <em>Agrimate</em> can quantitatively reproduce monthly world market price hikes and annual changes in regional supply, consumption, and stocks during the 2007/08 and 2010/11 world food crises. Further, we study potential food security risks arising from multi-breadbasket failures. We find that in a <span><math><mrow><mo>+</mo><mn>2</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>°</mo><mi>C</mi></mrow></math></span>world, the risk of severe (90th percentile) price hikes more than doubles, while the risk of severe regional consumption losses increases by up to 130%, compared to 2006–2015 climate conditions. Our modeling shows that <em>Agrimate</em> can provide policy-relevant insights into the spreading of food security risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 108546"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925000291","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The concentration of crop production in a few global breadbaskets and strong import dependencies of many developing countries render global grain markets susceptible to systemic shocks from weather- or conflict-induced supply failures. Often amplified by unilateral policy responses, such as export restrictions, the resulting short-term risks to global food security are substantial but insufficiently captured by established modeling approaches. Here, we present Agrimate, a dynamic agent-based agricultural market model. Explicitly accounting for commercial and strategic stockholding, and endogenously modeling supply- and demand-side responses, Agrimate describes the spreading of supply failures in international grain trade networks and associated price effects with high temporal resolution. For the major food grain wheat, we show that Agrimate can quantitatively reproduce monthly world market price hikes and annual changes in regional supply, consumption, and stocks during the 2007/08 and 2010/11 world food crises. Further, we study potential food security risks arising from multi-breadbasket failures. We find that in a world, the risk of severe (90th percentile) price hikes more than doubles, while the risk of severe regional consumption losses increases by up to 130%, compared to 2006–2015 climate conditions. Our modeling shows that Agrimate can provide policy-relevant insights into the spreading of food security risks.
期刊介绍:
Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership.
Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.