Patient-specific lattice-Boltzmann simulations with inflow conditions from magnetic resonance velocimetry measurements for analyzing cerebral aneurysms

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 BIOLOGY Computers in biology and medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.109794
Mario Rüttgers , Moritz Waldmann , Shota Ito , Carolin Wüstenhagen , Sven Grundmann , Martin Brede , Andreas Lintermann
{"title":"Patient-specific lattice-Boltzmann simulations with inflow conditions from magnetic resonance velocimetry measurements for analyzing cerebral aneurysms","authors":"Mario Rüttgers ,&nbsp;Moritz Waldmann ,&nbsp;Shota Ito ,&nbsp;Carolin Wüstenhagen ,&nbsp;Sven Grundmann ,&nbsp;Martin Brede ,&nbsp;Andreas Lintermann","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.109794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Magnetic resonance velocimetry (MRV) measurements were used as inflow conditions for lattice-Boltzmann (LB) simulations to analyze cerebral aneurysms. Unlike previous studies on larger vascular structures, aneurysm analysis involves smaller scales and higher pressure differences, making near-wall velocity measurements challenging with standard 3 Tesla scanners. To address this, the aneurysm geometry was scaled 5-fold for sufficient magnetic resonance velocimetry (MRV) resolution, with inflow measurements interpolated onto the simulation grid while ensuring dimensionless equivalence via the Reynolds number. Zero-velocity points were included near walls to enforce the no-slip condition if measurement points exceed the simulation domain. The proposed interpolation-based inflow method was compared to a nearest-neighbor approach and a parabolic velocity profile. It achieved the best agreement with MRV centerline velocity measurements (mean error: 3.12%), followed by the nearest-neighbor method (3.18%) and the parabolic profile (9.85%). The parabolic inflow led to centerline velocity overpredictions and total pressure underpredictions, while the nearest-neighbor approach underestimated the wall shear stress (WSS) and exhibited inconsistencies in wall normal stress (e.g., maximum WSS was 18.3% lower than with interpolation). Using the interpolated inflow method, Newtonian and non-Newtonian flows based on the Carreau–Yasuda model were compared. The non-Newtonian model showed lower centerline velocities and total pressure but higher WSS than the Newtonian case. These findings highlight the importance of accurate, patient-specific inflow conditions and the necessity of non-Newtonian modeling for reliable WSS predictions. Combining MRV measurements with non-Newtonian LB simulations provides a robust framework for personalized cerebral aneurysm hemodynamic evaluation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10578,"journal":{"name":"Computers in biology and medicine","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 109794"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in biology and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482525001441","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Magnetic resonance velocimetry (MRV) measurements were used as inflow conditions for lattice-Boltzmann (LB) simulations to analyze cerebral aneurysms. Unlike previous studies on larger vascular structures, aneurysm analysis involves smaller scales and higher pressure differences, making near-wall velocity measurements challenging with standard 3 Tesla scanners. To address this, the aneurysm geometry was scaled 5-fold for sufficient magnetic resonance velocimetry (MRV) resolution, with inflow measurements interpolated onto the simulation grid while ensuring dimensionless equivalence via the Reynolds number. Zero-velocity points were included near walls to enforce the no-slip condition if measurement points exceed the simulation domain. The proposed interpolation-based inflow method was compared to a nearest-neighbor approach and a parabolic velocity profile. It achieved the best agreement with MRV centerline velocity measurements (mean error: 3.12%), followed by the nearest-neighbor method (3.18%) and the parabolic profile (9.85%). The parabolic inflow led to centerline velocity overpredictions and total pressure underpredictions, while the nearest-neighbor approach underestimated the wall shear stress (WSS) and exhibited inconsistencies in wall normal stress (e.g., maximum WSS was 18.3% lower than with interpolation). Using the interpolated inflow method, Newtonian and non-Newtonian flows based on the Carreau–Yasuda model were compared. The non-Newtonian model showed lower centerline velocities and total pressure but higher WSS than the Newtonian case. These findings highlight the importance of accurate, patient-specific inflow conditions and the necessity of non-Newtonian modeling for reliable WSS predictions. Combining MRV measurements with non-Newtonian LB simulations provides a robust framework for personalized cerebral aneurysm hemodynamic evaluation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑动脉瘤分析中磁共振测速测量入流条件下患者特异性晶格-玻尔兹曼模拟
采用磁共振测速(MRV)作为输入条件,进行格-玻尔兹曼(LB)模拟,分析脑动脉瘤。与之前对较大血管结构的研究不同,动脉瘤分析涉及更小的尺度和更高的压力差,这使得使用标准的3特斯拉扫描仪进行近壁速度测量具有挑战性。为了解决这个问题,动脉瘤的几何形状被缩放了5倍,以获得足够的磁共振测速(MRV)分辨率,并将流入测量内插到模拟网格中,同时通过雷诺数确保无量纲等效。当测点超出模拟范围时,在壁面附近加入零速度点以保证无滑移。将提出的基于插值的流入方法与最近邻方法和抛物线速度剖面进行了比较。该方法与MRV中心线速度测量结果吻合度最高(平均误差为3.12%),其次是最近邻法(3.18%)和抛物线剖面法(9.85%)。抛物线流入导致中心线速度高估和总压低估,而最近邻方法低估了壁面剪应力(WSS),并表现出壁面正应力的不一致性(例如,最大WSS比插值方法低18.3%)。采用插值入流方法,对基于carau - yasuda模型的牛顿流和非牛顿流进行了比较。与牛顿模型相比,非牛顿模型的中心线速度和总压较低,但WSS较高。这些发现强调了准确的、患者特定的流入条件的重要性,以及非牛顿模型对可靠的WSS预测的必要性。将MRV测量与非牛顿LB模拟相结合,为个性化脑动脉瘤血流动力学评估提供了强大的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers in biology and medicine
Computers in biology and medicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
1086
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Biology and Medicine is an international forum for sharing groundbreaking advancements in the use of computers in bioscience and medicine. This journal serves as a medium for communicating essential research, instruction, ideas, and information regarding the rapidly evolving field of computer applications in these domains. By encouraging the exchange of knowledge, we aim to facilitate progress and innovation in the utilization of computers in biology and medicine.
期刊最新文献
MIPHEI-ViT: Multiplex immunofluorescence prediction from H&E images using ViT foundation models. Precise oxygen therapy to emphysema patients by fuzzy-based gain tuning control of set-point regulated MRAC. Forecasting-based biomedical time-series data synthesis for open data and robust AI. Modeling strategies for CGM data: A scoping review of mechanistic, machine learning, and hybrid approaches in diabetes management. Natural language processing of biomedical text to map and prioritize protein-disease associations in HFpEF.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1