Utility of prophylactic central dissection in papillary thyroid carcinoma with clinically apparent lymph node metastases isolated to the lateral neck

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2025.109160
Sang Ngo BS , Theodore X. Hu MD , Catherine Y. Zhu MD , Elena G. Hughes BS, MS , Yifan V. Mao BS, BA , Michael W. Yeh MD , Masha J. Livhits MD , James X. Wu MD
{"title":"Utility of prophylactic central dissection in papillary thyroid carcinoma with clinically apparent lymph node metastases isolated to the lateral neck","authors":"Sang Ngo BS ,&nbsp;Theodore X. Hu MD ,&nbsp;Catherine Y. Zhu MD ,&nbsp;Elena G. Hughes BS, MS ,&nbsp;Yifan V. Mao BS, BA ,&nbsp;Michael W. Yeh MD ,&nbsp;Masha J. Livhits MD ,&nbsp;James X. Wu MD","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The utility of prophylactic ipsilateral central neck dissection in papillary thyroid carcinoma presenting with clinically/sonographically apparent lymph node metastases isolated to the lateral neck is unclear. The study assessed whether prophylactic central neck dissection was associated with improved recurrence-free survival.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Single-center retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing thyroidectomy and lateral neck dissection for initial treatment of papillary thyroid carcinoma with clinically/sonographically apparent lymph node metastases isolated to the lateral neck from 2006 to 2022. We compared patients who underwent prophylactic central neck dissection with those who did not. Primary outcome was estimated recurrence-free probability, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study cohort comprised 65 patients, 53 (81.5%) of whom received prophylactic central neck dissection in addition to total thyroidectomy and lateral neck dissection. Clinicopathologic features in the 2 groups were similar. Median follow-up was 50.2 months. The estimated 10-year recurrence-free probability was 92.5% for patients who received prophylactic central neck dissection and 66.7% for those who did not receive prophylactic central neck dissection (<em>P</em> = .013). Two of the 6 structural recurrences in the non–prophylactic central neck dissection group were found in the central neck and could potentially have been prevented by prophylactic central neck dissection. Patients who received prophylactic central neck dissection had a higher likelihood of achieving excellent response to therapy compared to patients who did not (59% vs 25%, <em>P</em> = .05). The rate of permanent hypoparathyroidism was comparable among patients who underwent prophylactic central neck dissection versus those who did not (<em>P</em> = .3), and no vocal cord palsy was observed in either group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In patients initially presenting with clinically apparent nodal metastases of papillary thyroid carcinoma isolated to the lateral neck, prophylactic central neck dissection performed concurrently with total thyroidectomy and lateral neck dissection is associated with improved recurrence-free survival and greater likelihood of excellent response to therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 109160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039606025000121","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The utility of prophylactic ipsilateral central neck dissection in papillary thyroid carcinoma presenting with clinically/sonographically apparent lymph node metastases isolated to the lateral neck is unclear. The study assessed whether prophylactic central neck dissection was associated with improved recurrence-free survival.

Methods

Single-center retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing thyroidectomy and lateral neck dissection for initial treatment of papillary thyroid carcinoma with clinically/sonographically apparent lymph node metastases isolated to the lateral neck from 2006 to 2022. We compared patients who underwent prophylactic central neck dissection with those who did not. Primary outcome was estimated recurrence-free probability, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

Results

The study cohort comprised 65 patients, 53 (81.5%) of whom received prophylactic central neck dissection in addition to total thyroidectomy and lateral neck dissection. Clinicopathologic features in the 2 groups were similar. Median follow-up was 50.2 months. The estimated 10-year recurrence-free probability was 92.5% for patients who received prophylactic central neck dissection and 66.7% for those who did not receive prophylactic central neck dissection (P = .013). Two of the 6 structural recurrences in the non–prophylactic central neck dissection group were found in the central neck and could potentially have been prevented by prophylactic central neck dissection. Patients who received prophylactic central neck dissection had a higher likelihood of achieving excellent response to therapy compared to patients who did not (59% vs 25%, P = .05). The rate of permanent hypoparathyroidism was comparable among patients who underwent prophylactic central neck dissection versus those who did not (P = .3), and no vocal cord palsy was observed in either group.

Conclusions

In patients initially presenting with clinically apparent nodal metastases of papillary thyroid carcinoma isolated to the lateral neck, prophylactic central neck dissection performed concurrently with total thyroidectomy and lateral neck dissection is associated with improved recurrence-free survival and greater likelihood of excellent response to therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲状腺乳头状癌伴侧颈明显淋巴结转移的预防性中央清扫术的应用
背景:在临床/超声表现为明显淋巴结转移到侧颈部的甲状腺乳头状癌中,预防性同侧中央颈部清扫术的应用尚不清楚。该研究评估了预防性中央颈部清扫是否与改善无复发生存率相关。方法采用单中心回顾性队列研究,对2006年至2022年行甲状腺切除术和侧颈清扫术的甲状腺乳头状癌患者进行初步治疗,并观察其临床/超声表现明显的淋巴结转移到侧颈。我们比较了接受预防性中枢性颈部清扫术的患者和未接受预防性中枢性颈部清扫术的患者。主要结局是估计无复发概率,使用Kaplan-Meier方法和log-rank检验计算。结果本研究共纳入65例患者,其中53例(81.5%)接受了预防性中枢性颈部清扫术,同时行甲状腺全切除术和侧颈清扫术。两组临床病理特征相似。中位随访时间为50.2个月。预估10年无复发率,接受预防性中央性颈部清扫术的患者为92.5%,未接受预防性中央性颈部清扫术的患者为66.7% (P = 0.013)。非预防性中枢性颈淋巴清扫组6例结构性复发中有2例发生在中枢性颈淋巴清扫,可以通过预防性中枢性颈淋巴清扫加以预防。与未接受预防性中央颈部清扫术的患者相比,接受预防性中央颈部清扫术的患者获得良好治疗反应的可能性更高(59% vs 25%, P = 0.05)。永久性甲状旁腺功能低下的发生率在接受预防性中央颈部清扫术的患者和未接受预防性中央颈部清扫术的患者中是相当的(P = .3),两组均未观察到声带麻痹。结论对于最初表现为临床明显的甲状腺乳头状癌淋巴结转移至外侧颈部的患者,预防性中央颈部清扫术同时进行甲状腺全切除术和外侧颈部清扫术可提高无复发生存期,并更有可能对治疗产生良好的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery
Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
687
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of a nomogram for early prediction of splenic infarction after minimally invasive spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study Withdrawal of life support following interfacility transfer in older adults with traumatic brain injury Metabolic dysfunction–Associated fatty liver disease impairs intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography quality: Development and validation of a predictive model Collaborative model between breast surgery and genetic counseling reduces wait times and increases pretesting genetic counseling volume Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus open Lichtenstein primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1