Cross-cultural consumer acceptance of cultured meat: A comparative study in Belgium, Chile, and China

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105454
María Ignacia Rodríguez Escobar , Shujun Han , Erasmo Cadena , Stefaan De Smet , Yung Hung
{"title":"Cross-cultural consumer acceptance of cultured meat: A comparative study in Belgium, Chile, and China","authors":"María Ignacia Rodríguez Escobar ,&nbsp;Shujun Han ,&nbsp;Erasmo Cadena ,&nbsp;Stefaan De Smet ,&nbsp;Yung Hung","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates consumer acceptance of cultured meat in Belgium, Chile, and China, countries with distinct meat consumption patterns and cultural contexts. An online survey (<em>n</em> = 1427) was conducted in the respective national language(s), with 471 respondents from Belgium, 464 from Chile, and 492 from China. The survey explored perceptions, attitudes, and behavioural intentions towards cultured meat. Across all countries, most respondents were meat eaters with a strong attachment to meat, and healthiness was ranked as the most important factor in daily food choices. In general, cultured meat was perceived as animal friendly and innovative. Chinese consumers were more likely to identify as late adopters of new food technologies but showed higher levels of likelihood to purchase, replace conventional meat with, and pay for cultured meat, compared to their Chilean and Belgian counterparts. Using the Value-Attitude-Behaviour (VAB) framework, the study investigates how personal values, meat attachment, and consumer innovativeness influence acceptance. Consumers from China emerged as the most open to consuming cultured meat, followed by those from Chile and Belgium. Differences in acceptance may relate to how meat attachment affects the perceived wholesomeness of cultured meat across countries. The study highlights key limitations, including the absence of sensory experience with cultured meat. It emphasizes the need for further research, especially in underexplored regions like Latin America, and advocates for tailored strategies targeting market segments based on dietary habits and cultural contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 105454"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325000291","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates consumer acceptance of cultured meat in Belgium, Chile, and China, countries with distinct meat consumption patterns and cultural contexts. An online survey (n = 1427) was conducted in the respective national language(s), with 471 respondents from Belgium, 464 from Chile, and 492 from China. The survey explored perceptions, attitudes, and behavioural intentions towards cultured meat. Across all countries, most respondents were meat eaters with a strong attachment to meat, and healthiness was ranked as the most important factor in daily food choices. In general, cultured meat was perceived as animal friendly and innovative. Chinese consumers were more likely to identify as late adopters of new food technologies but showed higher levels of likelihood to purchase, replace conventional meat with, and pay for cultured meat, compared to their Chilean and Belgian counterparts. Using the Value-Attitude-Behaviour (VAB) framework, the study investigates how personal values, meat attachment, and consumer innovativeness influence acceptance. Consumers from China emerged as the most open to consuming cultured meat, followed by those from Chile and Belgium. Differences in acceptance may relate to how meat attachment affects the perceived wholesomeness of cultured meat across countries. The study highlights key limitations, including the absence of sensory experience with cultured meat. It emphasizes the need for further research, especially in underexplored regions like Latin America, and advocates for tailored strategies targeting market segments based on dietary habits and cultural contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨文化消费者对人造肉的接受程度:比利时、智利和中国的比较研究
本研究调查了比利时、智利和中国这三个具有不同肉类消费模式和文化背景的国家的消费者对培养肉的接受程度。一项在线调查(n = 1427)以各自的国家语言进行,其中471名受访者来自比利时,464名来自智利,492名来自中国。该调查探讨了人们对人造肉的看法、态度和行为意图。在所有国家中,大多数受访者都是肉食者,对肉类有着强烈的依恋,健康被列为日常食物选择中最重要的因素。总的来说,人造肉被认为是对动物友好和创新的。与智利和比利时的消费者相比,中国消费者更有可能被认定为新食品技术的后期采用者,但他们更有可能购买、用培养肉替代传统肉类,并为其付费。利用价值态度行为(VAB)框架,该研究调查了个人价值观、肉类依恋和消费者创新如何影响接受度。中国消费者对食用人造肉的态度最为开放,其次是智利和比利时。接受程度的差异可能与各国对肉类的依恋如何影响人们对人造肉的健康感知有关。这项研究强调了关键的局限性,包括缺乏对培养肉的感官体验。它强调需要进一步研究,特别是在拉丁美洲等开发不足的地区,并主张根据饮食习惯和文化背景制定针对细分市场的量身定制战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
The suppression of moral engagement in consumer responses to animal slaughter Polychrome versus monochrome Nutri-Score shelf labels: An eye-tracking study of consumer attention and choice Effects of personality traits and context congruency on participant engagement in traditional central location tests and congruent versus incongruent digital immersive environments during affective product testing Sweetening the experience: How designed immersive multisensory environments modify yogurt taste and mouthfeel perception A cross-cultural study on the consumer perception and acceptance of grass-derived ingredients in Denmark and Austria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1