Tailoring Digital Content to Address Occupational Injustice: Improving Accessibility and Equity for Marginalized Groups

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1002/isd2.70004
Jessica Eise, Ulf Thoene
{"title":"Tailoring Digital Content to Address Occupational Injustice: Improving Accessibility and Equity for Marginalized Groups","authors":"Jessica Eise,&nbsp;Ulf Thoene","doi":"10.1002/isd2.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Creating equity in access to digital content and tools in the face of global chronic stressors can improve inclusivity and reduce an exacerbation of marginalization. The socio-political aspects of life are inherent in occupation and may reveal internal and external barriers that block meaningful digital engagement and inhibit a community's ability to thrive. In this article, the concept of occupational injustice is the lens through which we examine digital environments, content, and tools so that we may improve the marginalization and inequity experienced by certain groups. Based on 57 in-depth interviews with coffee stakeholders in Colombia, this study is a qualitative assessment of how occupation influences digital use. Data are gathered through participants' use of a tailored climate change adaptation website, www.climaycafe.com, and the users' reported experience. The data reveal that occupation influences digital usage through (1) how a user engages based on an occupation's social status, (2) what a user values based on occupational demands, (3) what is perceived as reliable and trustworthy based on occupational influence, and (4) feature preferences based on occupational exposure to technology. The findings demonstrate that digital content and tools can be tailored to reduce occupational injustice through an audience-centric focus that enhances accessibility, usability, and digital equity.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46610,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries","volume":"91 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/isd2.70004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Creating equity in access to digital content and tools in the face of global chronic stressors can improve inclusivity and reduce an exacerbation of marginalization. The socio-political aspects of life are inherent in occupation and may reveal internal and external barriers that block meaningful digital engagement and inhibit a community's ability to thrive. In this article, the concept of occupational injustice is the lens through which we examine digital environments, content, and tools so that we may improve the marginalization and inequity experienced by certain groups. Based on 57 in-depth interviews with coffee stakeholders in Colombia, this study is a qualitative assessment of how occupation influences digital use. Data are gathered through participants' use of a tailored climate change adaptation website, www.climaycafe.com, and the users' reported experience. The data reveal that occupation influences digital usage through (1) how a user engages based on an occupation's social status, (2) what a user values based on occupational demands, (3) what is perceived as reliable and trustworthy based on occupational influence, and (4) feature preferences based on occupational exposure to technology. The findings demonstrate that digital content and tools can be tailored to reduce occupational injustice through an audience-centric focus that enhances accessibility, usability, and digital equity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定制数字内容以解决职业不公正:改善边缘化群体的可及性和公平性
面对全球性的慢性压力源,在获取数字内容和工具方面创造公平,可以提高包容性,减少边缘化的加剧。生活的社会政治方面是职业所固有的,可能会暴露出阻碍有意义的数字参与和抑制社区繁荣能力的内部和外部障碍。在本文中,职业不公正的概念是我们审视数字环境、内容和工具的镜头,以便我们可以改善某些群体所经历的边缘化和不平等。基于对哥伦比亚咖啡利益相关者的57次深度访谈,本研究是对职业如何影响数字使用的定性评估。通过参与者使用量身定制的气候变化适应网站www.climaycafe.com和用户报告的经验收集数据。数据显示,职业通过(1)基于职业社会地位的用户参与度,(2)基于职业需求的用户价值观,(3)基于职业影响的可信赖性和可信赖性,以及(4)基于职业接触技术的特征偏好来影响数字使用。研究结果表明,数字内容和工具可以通过以受众为中心,提高可访问性、可用性和数字公平来减少职业不公正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
51
期刊最新文献
When Does Digital Finance Empower Women? Causal Evidence and Mechanisms From Rural Bangladesh Beyond Compliance: Institutional and Cybersecurity Pathways to Blockchain Audit Readiness in Emerging Financial Systems The Role of E-Governance in Promoting Government Accountability and Transparency in Ghana Information and Communication Technology and Public Service Delivery in Tanzania Local Government Authorities: The Moderating Role of Digital Literacy Speaking Their Language: Language Inclusion and YouTube Agricultural Content Engagement in Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1