Feature Identification Using Hypotheses of Relevance and a 2D-Cascade of SEQENS Ensembles

IF 3 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Expert Systems Pub Date : 2025-02-09 DOI:10.1111/exsy.70002
Joaquim Arlandis, Rafael Llobet, J. Ramón Navarro Cerdán, Laura Arnal, François Signol, Juan-Carlos Perez-Cortes
{"title":"Feature Identification Using Hypotheses of Relevance and a 2D-Cascade of SEQENS Ensembles","authors":"Joaquim Arlandis,&nbsp;Rafael Llobet,&nbsp;J. Ramón Navarro Cerdán,&nbsp;Laura Arnal,&nbsp;François Signol,&nbsp;Juan-Carlos Perez-Cortes","doi":"10.1111/exsy.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>SEQENS is an ensemble method aimed at feature identification that has demonstrated strong performance in identifying relevant genes in high-dimensional spaces, across different synthetic tasks. In this paper, we first introduce the differences between <i>feature importance</i>, <i>feature selection (FS)</i> and <i>feature identification</i> concepts. Following this, we present a framework based on SEQENS covering the following contributions: (1) computing the hypergeometric <i>p-</i>value of the features of a SEQENS output ranking in order to be able to establish a threshold between relevant and non-relevant features; (2) extending SEQENS by introducing the use of preselected features as hypotheses of relevance in the sequential FS, which may help to attract other features that might exhibit weak correlation with the target on their own, but gain relevance when combined with the preselected ones and; (3) designing an automated process based on a 2D-cascade of SEQENS ensembles to obtain a <i>purged feature set</i>, or PFS, that is, having as many relevant features, and as few non-relevant, as possible. The framework presented, named pc–SEQENS, integrates the former techniques so that the PFS is used as a hypothesis of relevance in a SEQENS ensemble. Performance is analysed in a gene expression identification task using the E-MTAB-3732 public database and synthetic targets. pc–SEQENS is compared to other state-of-the-art methods, including SEQENS to check the effect of using hypotheses of relevance. On average, the proposed framework identifies better the relevant genes, especially in unfavourable sample-to-dimension rates, and exhibits a stronger stability.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51053,"journal":{"name":"Expert Systems","volume":"42 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/exsy.70002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SEQENS is an ensemble method aimed at feature identification that has demonstrated strong performance in identifying relevant genes in high-dimensional spaces, across different synthetic tasks. In this paper, we first introduce the differences between feature importance, feature selection (FS) and feature identification concepts. Following this, we present a framework based on SEQENS covering the following contributions: (1) computing the hypergeometric p-value of the features of a SEQENS output ranking in order to be able to establish a threshold between relevant and non-relevant features; (2) extending SEQENS by introducing the use of preselected features as hypotheses of relevance in the sequential FS, which may help to attract other features that might exhibit weak correlation with the target on their own, but gain relevance when combined with the preselected ones and; (3) designing an automated process based on a 2D-cascade of SEQENS ensembles to obtain a purged feature set, or PFS, that is, having as many relevant features, and as few non-relevant, as possible. The framework presented, named pc–SEQENS, integrates the former techniques so that the PFS is used as a hypothesis of relevance in a SEQENS ensemble. Performance is analysed in a gene expression identification task using the E-MTAB-3732 public database and synthetic targets. pc–SEQENS is compared to other state-of-the-art methods, including SEQENS to check the effect of using hypotheses of relevance. On average, the proposed framework identifies better the relevant genes, especially in unfavourable sample-to-dimension rates, and exhibits a stronger stability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Systems
Expert Systems 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
266
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Expert Systems: The Journal of Knowledge Engineering publishes papers dealing with all aspects of knowledge engineering, including individual methods and techniques in knowledge acquisition and representation, and their application in the construction of systems – including expert systems – based thereon. Detailed scientific evaluation is an essential part of any paper. As well as traditional application areas, such as Software and Requirements Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction, and Artificial Intelligence, we are aiming at the new and growing markets for these technologies, such as Business, Economy, Market Research, and Medical and Health Care. The shift towards this new focus will be marked by a series of special issues covering hot and emergent topics.
期刊最新文献
Optimising Resource Use Through Low-Precision Feature Selection: A Performance Analysis of Logarithmic Division and Stochastic Rounding Machine Learning-Driven Passenger Demand Forecasting for Autonomous Taxi Transportation Systems in Smart Cities Quantification of Data Imbalance Modelling Context and Content Features for Fake News Detection Feature Identification Using Hypotheses of Relevance and a 2D-Cascade of SEQENS Ensembles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1