The Safety Assessment of Continuation of Perioperative Antiplatelet Therapy in Elective Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study

IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-09 DOI:10.1111/ases.70029
Toshifumi Watanabe, Takahisa Fujikawa, Keiji Nagata, Keita Tanaka, Taisuke Matsuoka, Ippei Yamana, Yuichiro Kawamura
{"title":"The Safety Assessment of Continuation of Perioperative Antiplatelet Therapy in Elective Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study","authors":"Toshifumi Watanabe,&nbsp;Takahisa Fujikawa,&nbsp;Keiji Nagata,&nbsp;Keita Tanaka,&nbsp;Taisuke Matsuoka,&nbsp;Ippei Yamana,&nbsp;Yuichiro Kawamura","doi":"10.1111/ases.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Robotic surgery under condition of maintaining perioperative antiplatelet therapy (APT) is considered to have the risk of perioperative hemorrhagic events. We examined whether perioperative continuation of APT increased intraoperative blood loss and incidence of hemorrhagic complications in robot-assisted colorectal resection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The medical records of patients who underwent robotic surgical resection of colorectal cancer at our hospital between September 2020 and December 2023 were enrolled. Intraoperative blood loss, incidence of blood transfusion, and postoperative hemorrhagic complications were evaluated after dividing the study population into an APT group (patients receiving perioperative APT) and a non-APT group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-seven patients were included in the APT group and 65 patients were the non-APT group. All patients in the APT group were continued aspirin monotherapy until the day before the surgery. There were more anticoagulated patients in the non-APT group than in the APT-group (27.7% vs. 7.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.0496). Median intraoperative blood loss in the APT and non-APT group were 14 and 15 mL, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.802). The incidence of intraoperative blood transfusion and postoperative hemorrhagic complication in the respective group were 0% and 4.6% (<i>p</i> = 0.553) and 0% and 1.5% (<i>p</i> = 1.00).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The results of this study suggested that perioperative continuation of APT will be allowed in robot-assisted colorectal resection in terms of safety.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ases.70029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Robotic surgery under condition of maintaining perioperative antiplatelet therapy (APT) is considered to have the risk of perioperative hemorrhagic events. We examined whether perioperative continuation of APT increased intraoperative blood loss and incidence of hemorrhagic complications in robot-assisted colorectal resection.

Methods

The medical records of patients who underwent robotic surgical resection of colorectal cancer at our hospital between September 2020 and December 2023 were enrolled. Intraoperative blood loss, incidence of blood transfusion, and postoperative hemorrhagic complications were evaluated after dividing the study population into an APT group (patients receiving perioperative APT) and a non-APT group.

Results

Twenty-seven patients were included in the APT group and 65 patients were the non-APT group. All patients in the APT group were continued aspirin monotherapy until the day before the surgery. There were more anticoagulated patients in the non-APT group than in the APT-group (27.7% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.0496). Median intraoperative blood loss in the APT and non-APT group were 14 and 15 mL, respectively (p = 0.802). The incidence of intraoperative blood transfusion and postoperative hemorrhagic complication in the respective group were 0% and 4.6% (p = 0.553) and 0% and 1.5% (p = 1.00).

Conclusion

The results of this study suggested that perioperative continuation of APT will be allowed in robot-assisted colorectal resection in terms of safety.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
129
期刊最新文献
Myoclonic Seizures After Endoscopic Cervical Disc Surgery: A Rare Complication or Just Coincidence? Comparison of Post-Radical Cystectomy Renal Function and Ileal Conduit-Related Complications Between Extracorporeal and Robot-Assisted Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion: A Single-Center Experience Marginal Indication for Thoracoscopic Surgery for Neonatal Bochdalek Hernia: “Anchor-Shaped Closure” Technique for the Patient's Own Residual Diaphragm Using a Loop Needle Device Internal Hernia Beneath the Obturator Nerve After Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: A Case Report With Literature Review Heller Myotomy and Dor Fundoplication in a Patient With History of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1