‘They Take the Mum Off You When You Come In’: An Ethnographic Study of Parent Experiences of Medicines Safety Systems in English Hospitals

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Expectations Pub Date : 2025-02-09 DOI:10.1111/hex.70161
Adam Sutherland, Denham L. Phipps, Stephen Tomlin, Suzanne Grant, Joanne Hughes, Joanna Chambers, Susan Kafka, Heidi Ridgewell, Darren M. Ashcroft
{"title":"‘They Take the Mum Off You When You Come In’: An Ethnographic Study of Parent Experiences of Medicines Safety Systems in English Hospitals","authors":"Adam Sutherland,&nbsp;Denham L. Phipps,&nbsp;Stephen Tomlin,&nbsp;Suzanne Grant,&nbsp;Joanne Hughes,&nbsp;Joanna Chambers,&nbsp;Susan Kafka,&nbsp;Heidi Ridgewell,&nbsp;Darren M. Ashcroft","doi":"10.1111/hex.70161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Medication safety in healthcare settings is a persistent problem, and children may be at greater risk of harm than adults. Most existing research examining medication safety for hospitalised children is from the perspective of healthcare professionals and organisations. This study aimed to ethnographically explore parent and staff perspectives on the role of parents in medication safety in the paediatric hospital setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>230 h of ethnographic observation and 19 semi-structured interviews with clinical staff and parents were conducted over paediatric wards in three acute hospitals in Northern England between October 2020 and May 2022. Data was organised and coded using NVivo and analysed thematically.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Three main themes were identified: (1) Capacity and Capability: Parents were often assumed to be incompetent by organisational policies and managers but at the same time were co-opted to undertake medication processes to meet operational needs. Parental experience was often ignored or judged negatively. When things went wrong parents were sometimes blamed. (2) Communication: parents were seldom meaningfully involved in decisions about their children's medication or provided with appropriate information unless requested. Parental medication histories were treated with suspicion and validated against inaccurate records. (3) Agency and Autonomy: parents often wanted to participate in their child's care but were expected to be passive observers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Medication safety for children is a social phenomenon involving healthcare professionals and parents. However, parents are often relegated to a passive role by healthcare staff. We posit that this represents an example of epistemic injustice in the way parents are assumed to be incompetent outsiders with no understanding of the medical care of their children, despite them offering resilience for medicines safety. We recommend further exploration of how parents contribute to resilience and safety for children in hospital and the barriers to this, and how health services can safely support increased engagement and involvement of parents in the care of their children while in hospital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Parents contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data collection and have contributed to the preparation of the manuscript.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70161","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70161","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Medication safety in healthcare settings is a persistent problem, and children may be at greater risk of harm than adults. Most existing research examining medication safety for hospitalised children is from the perspective of healthcare professionals and organisations. This study aimed to ethnographically explore parent and staff perspectives on the role of parents in medication safety in the paediatric hospital setting.

Methods

230 h of ethnographic observation and 19 semi-structured interviews with clinical staff and parents were conducted over paediatric wards in three acute hospitals in Northern England between October 2020 and May 2022. Data was organised and coded using NVivo and analysed thematically.

Results

Three main themes were identified: (1) Capacity and Capability: Parents were often assumed to be incompetent by organisational policies and managers but at the same time were co-opted to undertake medication processes to meet operational needs. Parental experience was often ignored or judged negatively. When things went wrong parents were sometimes blamed. (2) Communication: parents were seldom meaningfully involved in decisions about their children's medication or provided with appropriate information unless requested. Parental medication histories were treated with suspicion and validated against inaccurate records. (3) Agency and Autonomy: parents often wanted to participate in their child's care but were expected to be passive observers.

Conclusions

Medication safety for children is a social phenomenon involving healthcare professionals and parents. However, parents are often relegated to a passive role by healthcare staff. We posit that this represents an example of epistemic injustice in the way parents are assumed to be incompetent outsiders with no understanding of the medical care of their children, despite them offering resilience for medicines safety. We recommend further exploration of how parents contribute to resilience and safety for children in hospital and the barriers to this, and how health services can safely support increased engagement and involvement of parents in the care of their children while in hospital.

Patient or Public Contribution

Parents contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data collection and have contributed to the preparation of the manuscript.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“当你进来的时候,他们把妈妈从你身上带走了”:英国医院药品安全系统家长体验的民族志研究
卫生保健机构的用药安全是一个长期存在的问题,儿童受到伤害的风险可能比成人更大。大多数现有的研究检查住院儿童的药物安全是从医疗保健专业人员和组织的角度。本研究旨在从民族志的角度探讨家长和工作人员对儿科医院中家长在药物安全中的作用的看法。方法于2020年10月至2022年5月在英格兰北部3家急症医院儿科病房进行230小时的人种学观察和19次对临床工作人员和家长的半结构化访谈。使用NVivo对数据进行组织和编码,并进行主题分析。结果确定了三个主要主题:(1)能力和能力:组织政策和管理者经常认为父母是不称职的,但同时又被选择承担药物治疗过程以满足操作需求。父母的经历常常被忽视或被消极地评判。当事情出错时,父母有时会受到指责。(2)沟通:父母很少有意义地参与孩子的药物决策或提供适当的信息,除非要求。对父母的用药史持怀疑态度,并对不准确的记录进行验证。(3)能动性和自主性:父母往往希望参与孩子的照顾,但被期望成为被动的观察者。结论儿童用药安全是一个涉及医护人员和家长的社会现象。然而,父母往往被医护人员贬为被动角色。我们认为,这代表了认知不公正的一个例子,即父母被认为是不称职的局外人,不了解孩子的医疗保健,尽管他们为药品安全提供了弹性。我们建议进一步探讨父母如何为住院儿童的复原力和安全作出贡献,以及这方面的障碍,以及卫生服务如何能够安全地支持父母更多地参与和参与住院儿童的护理。患者或公众贡献家长对数据收集的分析和解释做出了贡献,并对手稿的准备做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
期刊最新文献
'What Do People With Long Covid Want From Healthcare Services?' A Qualitative Exploration From Lived Experience. Lived Experiences of Returning to Participation After Mild Stroke: A Phenomenological Study in Spain. Preconception Perceptions, Knowledge and Behaviours of Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Qualitative Study. Social Needs Screening Tools for Clinical Populations in Australia and New Zealand: A Scoping Review and Critical Analysis. Socio-Ecological Factors Influencing Maternal and Child Health Outcomes During Floods in South Punjab Pakistan 2025: A Mixed-Methods Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1