Disease progression trajectory curves to estimate saved time in Alzheimer's disease trials.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Contemporary clinical trials Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2025.107814
Guogen Shan, Yahui Zhang, Zhixin Tang, Guoqiao Wang, Samuel S Wu
{"title":"Disease progression trajectory curves to estimate saved time in Alzheimer's disease trials.","authors":"Guogen Shan, Yahui Zhang, Zhixin Tang, Guoqiao Wang, Samuel S Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2025.107814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the recent successful disease-modifying therapies against Alzheimer's disease (AD), there have been discussions on easily interpretable measures for treatment effects. Among them, saved time for patients treated with a new drug as compared to patients randomized to the placebo group offers easier interpretation than the reduced percentage in outcome decline at last visit which were commonly used in AD trials. The existing method to calculate saved time utilized the disease progression trajectory of the placebo group and the treatment effect at the last visit. We propose to develop two new methods that use the disease progression trajectories of both groups: (1) slope adjusted method; and (2) area under the curve method. We used data from the two donanemab trials and the donepezil trial to illustrate the application of the proposed methods and conducted simulation studies to compare these methods. When a drug has a constant treatment effect over time or early and middle difference in the disease progression, the second new method often has the saved time being longer than the existing method. When the treatment effect is an increasing function of time before the last visit as observed in disease-modifying therapy trials, the slope adjusted method could have a larger saved time as compared to the existing method. In many cases, the area under the curve method often has the smallest standard deviation of saved time.</p>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":" ","pages":"107814"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2025.107814","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the recent successful disease-modifying therapies against Alzheimer's disease (AD), there have been discussions on easily interpretable measures for treatment effects. Among them, saved time for patients treated with a new drug as compared to patients randomized to the placebo group offers easier interpretation than the reduced percentage in outcome decline at last visit which were commonly used in AD trials. The existing method to calculate saved time utilized the disease progression trajectory of the placebo group and the treatment effect at the last visit. We propose to develop two new methods that use the disease progression trajectories of both groups: (1) slope adjusted method; and (2) area under the curve method. We used data from the two donanemab trials and the donepezil trial to illustrate the application of the proposed methods and conducted simulation studies to compare these methods. When a drug has a constant treatment effect over time or early and middle difference in the disease progression, the second new method often has the saved time being longer than the existing method. When the treatment effect is an increasing function of time before the last visit as observed in disease-modifying therapy trials, the slope adjusted method could have a larger saved time as compared to the existing method. In many cases, the area under the curve method often has the smallest standard deviation of saved time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
随着最近针对阿尔茨海默病(AD)的疾病改变疗法取得成功,人们一直在讨论如何用易于解释的方法来衡量治疗效果。其中,与随机分配到安慰剂组的患者相比,接受新药治疗的患者所节省的时间比阿兹海默症试验中常用的最后一次就诊时结果下降的百分比更容易解释。现有的节省时间计算方法利用的是安慰剂组的疾病进展轨迹和最后一次就诊时的治疗效果。我们建议开发两种使用两组疾病进展轨迹的新方法:(1) 斜率调整法;(2) 曲线下面积法。我们使用了两项多奈单抗试验和多奈哌齐试验的数据来说明所提议方法的应用,并进行了模拟研究来比较这些方法。当一种药物的治疗效果随时间变化或疾病进展的早期和中期差异不变时,第二种新方法的节省时间往往比现有方法长。当治疗效果与最后一次就诊前的时间呈递增函数关系时(如在疾病改变疗法试验中观察到的情况),斜率调整法与现有方法相比,可节省更多的时间。在许多情况下,曲线下面积法通常具有最小的节省时间标准偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Treating seizures faster: The quality improvement in time to treat status epilepticus (QuITT-SE) multicenter randomized stepped wedge clinical trial protocol Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a novel xanthine oxidase inhibitor, tigulixostat, in gout patients with hyperuricemia: Design of the EURELIA 1 and EURELIA 2 studies. Promoting daily engagement in meaningful activity (DEMA) for people with cognitive impairment and their caregivers: Protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Disease progression trajectory curves to estimate saved time in Alzheimer's disease trials. Remote clinical trial to test mechanisms of ‘practice quitting’ treatment: Trial design and methodological report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1