A purely laparoscopic approach can reduce the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Esophagus Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1007/s10388-025-01110-1
Yoshiro Yukawa, Kotaro Yamashita, Kota Momose, Takuro Saito, Koji Tanaka, Tomoki Makino, Kazuyoshi Yamamoto, Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Yukinori Kurokawa, Ryohei Kawabata, Atsushi Takeno, Kiyokazu Nakajima, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Yuichiro Doki
{"title":"A purely laparoscopic approach can reduce the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy.","authors":"Yoshiro Yukawa, Kotaro Yamashita, Kota Momose, Takuro Saito, Koji Tanaka, Tomoki Makino, Kazuyoshi Yamamoto, Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Yukinori Kurokawa, Ryohei Kawabata, Atsushi Takeno, Kiyokazu Nakajima, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Yuichiro Doki","doi":"10.1007/s10388-025-01110-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer has become increasingly common to reduce postoperative pneumonia. However, the usefulness of pure laparoscopic abdominal manipulation without an upper abdominal incision remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the utility of pure laparoscopic surgery (LAP) vs. hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) in esophagectomy. A total of 344 consecutive patients who underwent curative esophagectomy for esophageal cancer from 2019 to 2023 were enrolled; 235 patients were treated with HALS and 109 with LAP. The peri- and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups using a propensity score-matched analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Propensity score matching was used to compare 92 patients each in the HALS and LAP groups. Clinicopathological characteristics did not differ between the two groups. The incidence of postoperative pneumonia was significantly higher in the HALS group than in the LAP group (30% vs. 11%, respectively; P = 0.001). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that HALS was independently associated with postoperative pneumonia (odds ratio 3.82, P = 0.002), along with older age and male sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LAP may reduce the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in esophageal cancer patients who undergo esophagectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11918,"journal":{"name":"Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-025-01110-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer has become increasingly common to reduce postoperative pneumonia. However, the usefulness of pure laparoscopic abdominal manipulation without an upper abdominal incision remains unclear.

Methods: We evaluated the utility of pure laparoscopic surgery (LAP) vs. hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) in esophagectomy. A total of 344 consecutive patients who underwent curative esophagectomy for esophageal cancer from 2019 to 2023 were enrolled; 235 patients were treated with HALS and 109 with LAP. The peri- and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups using a propensity score-matched analysis.

Results: Propensity score matching was used to compare 92 patients each in the HALS and LAP groups. Clinicopathological characteristics did not differ between the two groups. The incidence of postoperative pneumonia was significantly higher in the HALS group than in the LAP group (30% vs. 11%, respectively; P = 0.001). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that HALS was independently associated with postoperative pneumonia (odds ratio 3.82, P = 0.002), along with older age and male sex.

Conclusions: LAP may reduce the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in esophageal cancer patients who undergo esophagectomy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Esophagus
Esophagus GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Esophagus, the official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, introduces practitioners and researchers to significant studies in the fields of benign and malignant diseases of the esophagus. The journal welcomes original articles, review articles, and short articles including technical notes ( How I do it ), which will be peer-reviewed by the editorial board. Letters to the editor are also welcome. Special articles on esophageal diseases will be provided by the editorial board, and proceedings of symposia and workshops will be included in special issues for the Annual Congress of the Society.
期刊最新文献
A purely laparoscopic approach can reduce the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy. Comparison and validation of the Japanese classification 12th edition and American joint committee on cancer 8th edition on intrathoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Association between accelerometer-measured light-intensity physical activity and tumor regression for male patients with esophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy: a retrospective cohort study. Efficacy of a novel small-caliber therapeutic endoscope in peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal motility disorders: a propensity score matching analysis. Low skeletal muscle mass contributes to the prognosis of patients with superficial esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1