Use of signal detection methods to identify associations between prenatal medication exposure and subsequent childhood cancers: a Nordic hypothesis-generating registry-based study.
Hannah Johnson, Sarah Hjorth, Joan Morris, Anton Pottegård, Maarit Leinonen, Ulrika Norby, Hedvig Nordeng
{"title":"Use of signal detection methods to identify associations between prenatal medication exposure and subsequent childhood cancers: a Nordic hypothesis-generating registry-based study.","authors":"Hannah Johnson, Sarah Hjorth, Joan Morris, Anton Pottegård, Maarit Leinonen, Ulrika Norby, Hedvig Nordeng","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2461204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Childhood cancer is an important contributor to childhood mortality in high-income countries. Information on associations between childhood cancer and in-utero exposure is absent or limited for most medications. Signal detection methods identify medications where research should be focused but have not been applied to datasets containing prenatal medication exposures and childhood cancers.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The aim of this study was to apply and evaluate four signal detection methods - odds ratios (OR), the information component (IC), sequential probability ratio testing (SPRT), and Bayesian hierarchical models (BHM) - for identification of associations between medications dispensed during pregnancy and subsequent, incident diagnosis of childhood cancer <10 years, using linked Nordic registry data. Signal detection results were compared to propensity score adjusted odds ratios from generalized linear models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis was performed for 117 medication-cancer pairs with 5 or more observations. The OR had the greatest sensitivity (0.75). The IC had a greater specificity (0.98) than the OR (0.95).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IC may be the most appropriate method for identifying signals within this type of data. Reported signals should not be considered sufficient evidence of causal association and must be followed-up by tailored investigations that consider confounding by indication.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2461204","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Childhood cancer is an important contributor to childhood mortality in high-income countries. Information on associations between childhood cancer and in-utero exposure is absent or limited for most medications. Signal detection methods identify medications where research should be focused but have not been applied to datasets containing prenatal medication exposures and childhood cancers.
Research design and methods: The aim of this study was to apply and evaluate four signal detection methods - odds ratios (OR), the information component (IC), sequential probability ratio testing (SPRT), and Bayesian hierarchical models (BHM) - for identification of associations between medications dispensed during pregnancy and subsequent, incident diagnosis of childhood cancer <10 years, using linked Nordic registry data. Signal detection results were compared to propensity score adjusted odds ratios from generalized linear models.
Results: Analysis was performed for 117 medication-cancer pairs with 5 or more observations. The OR had the greatest sensitivity (0.75). The IC had a greater specificity (0.98) than the OR (0.95).
Conclusions: The IC may be the most appropriate method for identifying signals within this type of data. Reported signals should not be considered sufficient evidence of causal association and must be followed-up by tailored investigations that consider confounding by indication.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports.
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.