Adverse event profile of setmelanotide in obesity: an integrated assessment and systematic review using disproportionality analysis, case reports and meta-analysis.
{"title":"Adverse event profile of setmelanotide in obesity: an integrated assessment and systematic review using disproportionality analysis, case reports and meta-analysis.","authors":"Kannan Sridharan, Gowri Sivaramakrishnan","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2465880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Setmelanotide is approved for genetically determined obesity. While clinical trials and clinical evidence and practice provide some insights, a comprehensive assessment of its adverse event profile is needed that led to carrying out an assessment of reported adverse events in the USFDA Adverse Event Reporting System database, case reports and clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Multi-faceted analyses were carried out as follows: disproportionality measures employing frequentist and Bayesian methods; systematic review and meta-analysis (Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL and Google Scholar) generated-pooled estimates [proportion with 95% confidence intervals (CI)]; and published reports with adverse events to setmelanotide.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The disproportionality analysis (<i>n</i> = 228) identified skin hyperpigmentation, injection-site reactions, nausea, melanocytic nevus and ephelides as key safety signals. Meta-analysis (seven trials; <i>n</i> = 185) confirmed high rates of injection-site reactions (96%; 95% CI: 89, 100), skin hyperpigmentation (62%; 95% CI: 43, 78), nausea (36%; 95% CI: 24, 49), vomiting (26%; 95% CI: 18, 34), and diarrhea (21%; 95% CI: 14, 29). Individual case reports corroborated these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides a detailed overview of setmelanotide's adverse event profile, highlighting the need for careful patient monitoring, emphasizing the importance of ongoing safety surveillance for at least 1.5 years, and further research to refine patient management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2465880","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Setmelanotide is approved for genetically determined obesity. While clinical trials and clinical evidence and practice provide some insights, a comprehensive assessment of its adverse event profile is needed that led to carrying out an assessment of reported adverse events in the USFDA Adverse Event Reporting System database, case reports and clinical trials.
Research design and methods: Multi-faceted analyses were carried out as follows: disproportionality measures employing frequentist and Bayesian methods; systematic review and meta-analysis (Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL and Google Scholar) generated-pooled estimates [proportion with 95% confidence intervals (CI)]; and published reports with adverse events to setmelanotide.
Results: The disproportionality analysis (n = 228) identified skin hyperpigmentation, injection-site reactions, nausea, melanocytic nevus and ephelides as key safety signals. Meta-analysis (seven trials; n = 185) confirmed high rates of injection-site reactions (96%; 95% CI: 89, 100), skin hyperpigmentation (62%; 95% CI: 43, 78), nausea (36%; 95% CI: 24, 49), vomiting (26%; 95% CI: 18, 34), and diarrhea (21%; 95% CI: 14, 29). Individual case reports corroborated these findings.
Conclusion: This study provides a detailed overview of setmelanotide's adverse event profile, highlighting the need for careful patient monitoring, emphasizing the importance of ongoing safety surveillance for at least 1.5 years, and further research to refine patient management strategies.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports.
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.