Global vegetation response to extreme climate from 2001 to 2020.

Q3 Environmental Science 应用生态学报 Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202410.022
Peng-Hua Jiao, Jian-Zhi Niu, Yu-Bo Miao, Jun-Yi Li, Di Wang
{"title":"Global vegetation response to extreme climate from 2001 to 2020.","authors":"Peng-Hua Jiao, Jian-Zhi Niu, Yu-Bo Miao, Jun-Yi Li, Di Wang","doi":"10.13287/j.1001-9332.202410.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exploring the spatiotemporal variations and response characteristics of global vegetation and extreme climate is of great significance for addressing global climate change and improving ecosystem stability. Based on ERA5 climate data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts and MODIS normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data, we used Sen's trend analysis, correlation analysis, and random forest regression model to explore the responses of NDVI of five vegetation types (boreal and temperate forest, tropical forest, other woody vegetation, grassland, and cropland) to 23 extreme climate indices from 2001 to 2020. The results showed that global NDVI showed an overall increasing trend from 2001 to 2020. The areas with the most significant growth trend was boreal and temperate forest, and the least significant growth trend occurred in cropland. In terms of extreme climate index, except for a few extreme high temperature and low temperature indices, the other indices showed an increasing trend. Across different vegetation areas, the extreme climate index that had the greatest influence on NDVI was different. The results of correlation analysis showed that the indices with the greatest impact on NDVI in the boreal and temperate forest, tropical forest, other woody vegetation, grassland, and cropland were cold days, ice days, annual total precipitation, annual total precipitation, and annual total precipitation, respectively. The results of random forest analysis showed that the indices with the greatest impact on NDVI in each vegetation zone were cold days, warm night days, frost days, warm days, and the cold spell duration index, respectively. The reason for the different results between the two methods was that correlation analysis only reflected linear relationships between variables, while the random forest regression model could capture more complex nonlinear relationships. Our results showed that the response of global vegetation to extreme climate had significant regional differences and complexities, which may result from interactions between different climate factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":35942,"journal":{"name":"应用生态学报","volume":"35 11","pages":"2992-3004"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"应用生态学报","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202410.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exploring the spatiotemporal variations and response characteristics of global vegetation and extreme climate is of great significance for addressing global climate change and improving ecosystem stability. Based on ERA5 climate data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts and MODIS normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data, we used Sen's trend analysis, correlation analysis, and random forest regression model to explore the responses of NDVI of five vegetation types (boreal and temperate forest, tropical forest, other woody vegetation, grassland, and cropland) to 23 extreme climate indices from 2001 to 2020. The results showed that global NDVI showed an overall increasing trend from 2001 to 2020. The areas with the most significant growth trend was boreal and temperate forest, and the least significant growth trend occurred in cropland. In terms of extreme climate index, except for a few extreme high temperature and low temperature indices, the other indices showed an increasing trend. Across different vegetation areas, the extreme climate index that had the greatest influence on NDVI was different. The results of correlation analysis showed that the indices with the greatest impact on NDVI in the boreal and temperate forest, tropical forest, other woody vegetation, grassland, and cropland were cold days, ice days, annual total precipitation, annual total precipitation, and annual total precipitation, respectively. The results of random forest analysis showed that the indices with the greatest impact on NDVI in each vegetation zone were cold days, warm night days, frost days, warm days, and the cold spell duration index, respectively. The reason for the different results between the two methods was that correlation analysis only reflected linear relationships between variables, while the random forest regression model could capture more complex nonlinear relationships. Our results showed that the response of global vegetation to extreme climate had significant regional differences and complexities, which may result from interactions between different climate factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2001 - 2020年全球植被对极端气候的响应。
探索全球植被与极端气候的时空变化及其响应特征,对于应对全球气候变化、提高生态系统稳定性具有重要意义。基于欧洲中期天气预报中心ERA5气候数据和MODIS归一化植被差异指数(NDVI)数据,利用Sen’s趋势分析、相关分析和随机森林回归模型,探讨了2001 - 2020年5种植被类型(寒温带森林、热带森林、其他木本植被、草地和农田)NDVI对23个极端气候指数的响应。结果表明:2001 ~ 2020年全球NDVI总体呈上升趋势;生长趋势最显著的区域是寒带和温带森林,生长趋势最不显著的区域是农田。极端气候指数方面,除少数极端高温和极端低温指数外,其余指数均呈上升趋势。不同植被区对NDVI影响最大的极端气候指数存在差异。相关分析结果表明,寒温带森林、热带森林、其他木本植被、草地和农田对NDVI影响最大的指数分别是冷日数、冰日数、年总降水量、年总降水量和年总降水量。随机森林分析结果表明,各植被带对NDVI影响最大的指数分别为冷日数、暖夜日数、霜冻日数、暖日数和寒潮持续时间指数。两种方法结果不同的原因是相关分析只能反映变量之间的线性关系,而随机森林回归模型可以捕捉到更复杂的非线性关系。结果表明,全球植被对极端气候的响应具有显著的区域差异和复杂性,这可能是不同气候因子相互作用的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
应用生态学报
应用生态学报 Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11393
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
[Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance in seedlings of the Populus 'Shaxin' series (hybrid progeny of poplars) in the Three-North Region, China]. [Appropriate size and quantity of land gravelization monitoring quadrats in desert areas]. [Delineation of territorial space ecological restoration zoning based on the characteristics of 'source-flow-sink' of ecosystem services: A case study of Xi'an City, Shaanxi Province, China]. [Ecological zoning of Hexi Corridor, Northwest China with coupled ecosystem service value and ecological risk assessment]. [Effects of conservation tillage with straw returning on soil microbial community structure and function in the Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1