An Examination of Implementation Fidelity Within the Context of a Tier 2 Mathematics Intervention.

IF 2.9 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Learning Disabilities Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-09 DOI:10.1177/00222194251315191
Cayla Lussier, Ben Clarke, Derek Kosty, Geovanna Rodriguez, Kathleen Scalise, Christian Doabler, Jessica Turtura
{"title":"An Examination of Implementation Fidelity Within the Context of a Tier 2 Mathematics Intervention.","authors":"Cayla Lussier, Ben Clarke, Derek Kosty, Geovanna Rodriguez, Kathleen Scalise, Christian Doabler, Jessica Turtura","doi":"10.1177/00222194251315191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidenced-based mathematics interventions are critical for supporting students with mathematics difficulties. In research and practice, collecting implementation fidelity is important for ensuring that all the core components of the intervention are implemented as designed. Historically, implementation fidelity has been defined as multifaceted, including examinations of adherence, instructional quality, and student engagement, though mathematics intervention studies rarely report on fidelity components outside of adherence. The current study examined the relationships between these different components of fidelity and whether they are associated with student mathematics outcomes and intervention group size within the context of a first-grade mathematics intervention. Findings revealed relationships between components of fidelity with student's initial mathematics skill; however, no relationship was observed between fidelity components and student mathematics growth. Findings for group size were mixed. Limitations, implications for research and practice, and future directions are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"459-470"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194251315191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidenced-based mathematics interventions are critical for supporting students with mathematics difficulties. In research and practice, collecting implementation fidelity is important for ensuring that all the core components of the intervention are implemented as designed. Historically, implementation fidelity has been defined as multifaceted, including examinations of adherence, instructional quality, and student engagement, though mathematics intervention studies rarely report on fidelity components outside of adherence. The current study examined the relationships between these different components of fidelity and whether they are associated with student mathematics outcomes and intervention group size within the context of a first-grade mathematics intervention. Findings revealed relationships between components of fidelity with student's initial mathematics skill; however, no relationship was observed between fidelity components and student mathematics growth. Findings for group size were mixed. Limitations, implications for research and practice, and future directions are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二级数学干预背景下的实施保真度检验。
基于证据的数学干预对于支持有数学困难的学生至关重要。在研究和实践中,收集实施保真度对于确保干预的所有核心组件按设计实施非常重要。从历史上看,实施保真度被定义为多方面的,包括遵守、教学质量和学生参与的考试,尽管数学干预研究很少报告遵守之外的保真度成分。本研究在一年级数学干预的背景下,检验了这些不同的保真度成分之间的关系,以及它们是否与学生数学成绩和干预组规模有关。研究结果揭示了保真度各成分与学生初始数学技能之间的关系;然而,保真度成分与学生数学成长之间没有关系。对于群体规模的研究结果是混合的。讨论了局限性、对研究和实践的启示以及未来的发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Learning Disabilities (JLD), a multidisciplinary, international publication, presents work and comments related to learning disabilities. Initial consideration of a manuscript depends upon (a) the relevance and usefulness of the content to the readership; (b) how the manuscript compares to other articles dealing with similar content on pertinent variables (e.g., sample size, research design, review of literature); (c) clarity of writing style; and (d) the author"s adherence to APA guidelines. Articles cover such fields as education, psychology, neurology, medicine, law, and counseling.
期刊最新文献
A Meta-Analysis of Mathematics Fact Fluency Interventions for Students With Mathematics Difficulties (MD). The Family Quality of Life of Children With Specific Learning Disabilities, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, and Their Co-Occurrence: A Cross-Sectional Study. A Synthesis of Mathematics Interventions for High School Students With Mathematics Difficulties. Specific Learning Difficulties: Disparities in Identification University Students With Specific Learning Disabilities: Do Soft Skills and Study-Related Factors Make a Difference to Their Academic Outcomes?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1