ChatGPT-4o's Performance in Brain Tumor Diagnosis and MRI Findings: A Comparative Analysis with Radiologists

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2025.01.033
Cemre Ozenbas MD, PhD , Duygu Engin MD, PhD , Tayfun Altinok MD, PhD , Emrah Akcay MD, PhD , Ulas Aktas MD, PhD , Alper Tabanli MD, PhD
{"title":"ChatGPT-4o's Performance in Brain Tumor Diagnosis and MRI Findings: A Comparative Analysis with Radiologists","authors":"Cemre Ozenbas MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Duygu Engin MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tayfun Altinok MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Emrah Akcay MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ulas Aktas MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Alper Tabanli MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.01.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the accuracy of ChatGPT-4o in identifying magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and diagnosing brain tumors by comparing its performance with that of experienced radiologists.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included 46 patients with pathologically confirmed brain tumors who underwent preoperative MRI between January 2021 and October 2024. Two experienced radiologists and ChatGPT 4o independently evaluated the anonymized MRI images. Eight questions focusing on MRI sequences, lesion characteristics, and diagnoses were answered. ChatGPT-4o's responses were compared to those of the radiologists and the pathology outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed, which included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the McNemar test, with p<!--> <!-->&lt;0.05 considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ChatGPT-4o successfully identified 44 of the 46 (95.7%) lesions; it achieved 88.3% accuracy in identifying MRI sequences, 81% in perilesional edema, 79.5% in signal characteristics, and 82.2% in contrast enhancement. However, its accuracy in localizing lesions was 53.6% and that in distinguishing extra-axial from intra-axial lesions was 26.3%. As such, ChatGPT-4o achieved success rates of 56.8% and 29.5% for differential diagnoses and most likely diagnoses when compared to 93.2–90.9% and 70.5–65.9% for radiologists, respectively (p<!--> <!-->&lt;0.005).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ChatGPT-4o demonstrated high accuracy in identifying certain MRI features but underperformed in diagnostic tasks in comparison with the radiologists. Despite its current limitations, future updates and advancements have the potential to enable large language models to facilitate diagnosis and offer a reliable second opinion to radiologists.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"32 6","pages":"Pages 3608-3617"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633225000893","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives

To evaluate the accuracy of ChatGPT-4o in identifying magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and diagnosing brain tumors by comparing its performance with that of experienced radiologists.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study included 46 patients with pathologically confirmed brain tumors who underwent preoperative MRI between January 2021 and October 2024. Two experienced radiologists and ChatGPT 4o independently evaluated the anonymized MRI images. Eight questions focusing on MRI sequences, lesion characteristics, and diagnoses were answered. ChatGPT-4o's responses were compared to those of the radiologists and the pathology outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed, which included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the McNemar test, with p <0.05 considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

ChatGPT-4o successfully identified 44 of the 46 (95.7%) lesions; it achieved 88.3% accuracy in identifying MRI sequences, 81% in perilesional edema, 79.5% in signal characteristics, and 82.2% in contrast enhancement. However, its accuracy in localizing lesions was 53.6% and that in distinguishing extra-axial from intra-axial lesions was 26.3%. As such, ChatGPT-4o achieved success rates of 56.8% and 29.5% for differential diagnoses and most likely diagnoses when compared to 93.2–90.9% and 70.5–65.9% for radiologists, respectively (p <0.005).

Conclusion

ChatGPT-4o demonstrated high accuracy in identifying certain MRI features but underperformed in diagnostic tasks in comparison with the radiologists. Despite its current limitations, future updates and advancements have the potential to enable large language models to facilitate diagnosis and offer a reliable second opinion to radiologists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
chatgpt - 40在脑肿瘤诊断和MRI表现中的表现:与放射科医生的比较分析。
基本原理和目的:通过与经验丰富的放射科医生的表现进行比较,评估chatgpt - 40在识别磁共振成像(MRI)表现和诊断脑肿瘤方面的准确性。材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入了46例经病理证实的脑肿瘤患者,这些患者于2021年1月至2024年10月期间接受了术前MRI检查。两名经验丰富的放射科医生和ChatGPT 40独立评估匿名MRI图像。回答了MRI序列、病变特征和诊断方面的八个问题。chatgpt - 40的反应与放射科医生的反应和病理结果进行了比较。统计分析包括准确性、敏感性、特异性和McNemar试验,结果显示:chatgpt - 40成功识别了46个病变中的44个(95.7%);鉴别MRI序列的准确率为88.3%,病灶周围水肿的准确率为81%,信号特征的准确率为79.5%,对比增强的准确率为82.2%。然而,其定位病变的准确率为53.6%,区分轴外和轴内病变的准确率为26.3%。因此,chatgpt - 40在鉴别诊断和最可能诊断方面的成功率分别为56.8%和29.5%,而放射科医生的成功率分别为93.2-90.9%和70.5-65.9% (pConclusion: chatgpt - 40在识别某些MRI特征方面表现出较高的准确性,但在诊断任务方面表现不如放射科医生。尽管目前存在局限性,但未来的更新和进步有可能使大型语言模型能够促进诊断,并为放射科医生提供可靠的第二意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound Video-Based Deep Learning Model for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Status and Nodal Burden in Breast Cancer. Prediction of Recurrence-Free Survival in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors via Mixed CT Radiomics-Postoperative Pathology Models. Preoperative Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Using a Three-tier MRI Radiomics Model with Nested Cross-validation. Minimum Clinically Achievable Dose for Detecting Liver Lesions Using Deep Learning Image Reconstruction: A Phantom and Patient Study. Value of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Quantitative Parameters in Evaluating the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1