Outcomes of Open Arthrotomy and Arthroscopic Surgery for Primary Synovial Chondromatosis of the Hip: A Comparative Study With Propensity Score Matching.

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS American Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-09 DOI:10.1177/03635465251316312
Han Soul Kim, Cha Hyeong Ok, Jae Suk Chang, Ji Wan Kim, Chul-Ho Kim
{"title":"Outcomes of Open Arthrotomy and Arthroscopic Surgery for Primary Synovial Chondromatosis of the Hip: A Comparative Study With Propensity Score Matching.","authors":"Han Soul Kim, Cha Hyeong Ok, Jae Suk Chang, Ji Wan Kim, Chul-Ho Kim","doi":"10.1177/03635465251316312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the widespread use of arthroscopic surgery for hip synovial chondromatosis, its postoperative outcomes remain uncertain. A head-to-head comparison between open arthrotomy and arthroscopic surgery is lacking.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the treatment outcomes of open arthrotomy, particularly with surgical dislocation, and arthroscopic surgery for hip synovial chondromatosis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who were surgically treated for symptomatic synovial chondromatosis in a tertiary university referral hospital between April 1996 and February 2023 were investigated via 1:1 propensity score matching to compare open arthrotomy and arthroscopic surgery. The primary outcome was chondromatosis recurrence. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcome scores, reoperations, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 73 patients were enrolled, and after matching, 28 patients in each group were investigated. The mean age and mean follow-up period were 40.5 ± 13.7 years and 4.0 ± 3.1 years, respectively. Clinical and radiological recurrence rates did not differ between groups (clinical recurrence: 7.1% for open arthrotomy vs 25.0% for arthroscopic surgery [<i>P</i> = .143]; radiological recurrence: 14.3% for open arthrotomy vs 32.1% for arthroscopic surgery [<i>P</i> = .205]). However, all patient-reported outcomes at final follow-up were in favor of open arthrotomy compared with arthroscopic surgery (visual analog scale for pain: 1.6 for open arthrotomy vs 3.1 for arthroscopic surgery [<i>P</i> = .002]; quality of life scale: 80.4 for open arthrotomy vs 65.4 for arthroscopic surgery [<i>P</i> < .001]; and modified Harris Hip Score: 84.4 for open arthrotomy vs 75.9 for arthroscopic surgery [<i>P</i> = .001]). The symptom dissatisfaction rate at final follow-up was significantly higher with arthroscopic surgery than with open arthrotomy (35.7% vs 7.1%, respectively; <i>P</i> = .020). There was no difference in reoperation and complication rates between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For treating primary synovial chondromatosis, particularly when it is distributed across both the central and peripheral zones, arthroscopic surgery should be chosen with caution, and open arthrotomy with surgical dislocation should be actively considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"3635465251316312"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251316312","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the widespread use of arthroscopic surgery for hip synovial chondromatosis, its postoperative outcomes remain uncertain. A head-to-head comparison between open arthrotomy and arthroscopic surgery is lacking.

Purpose: To compare the treatment outcomes of open arthrotomy, particularly with surgical dislocation, and arthroscopic surgery for hip synovial chondromatosis.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: All patients who were surgically treated for symptomatic synovial chondromatosis in a tertiary university referral hospital between April 1996 and February 2023 were investigated via 1:1 propensity score matching to compare open arthrotomy and arthroscopic surgery. The primary outcome was chondromatosis recurrence. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcome scores, reoperations, and complications.

Results: A total of 73 patients were enrolled, and after matching, 28 patients in each group were investigated. The mean age and mean follow-up period were 40.5 ± 13.7 years and 4.0 ± 3.1 years, respectively. Clinical and radiological recurrence rates did not differ between groups (clinical recurrence: 7.1% for open arthrotomy vs 25.0% for arthroscopic surgery [P = .143]; radiological recurrence: 14.3% for open arthrotomy vs 32.1% for arthroscopic surgery [P = .205]). However, all patient-reported outcomes at final follow-up were in favor of open arthrotomy compared with arthroscopic surgery (visual analog scale for pain: 1.6 for open arthrotomy vs 3.1 for arthroscopic surgery [P = .002]; quality of life scale: 80.4 for open arthrotomy vs 65.4 for arthroscopic surgery [P < .001]; and modified Harris Hip Score: 84.4 for open arthrotomy vs 75.9 for arthroscopic surgery [P = .001]). The symptom dissatisfaction rate at final follow-up was significantly higher with arthroscopic surgery than with open arthrotomy (35.7% vs 7.1%, respectively; P = .020). There was no difference in reoperation and complication rates between the 2 groups.

Conclusion: For treating primary synovial chondromatosis, particularly when it is distributed across both the central and peripheral zones, arthroscopic surgery should be chosen with caution, and open arthrotomy with surgical dislocation should be actively considered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
425
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An invaluable resource for the orthopaedic sports medicine community, _The American Journal of Sports Medicine_ is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, first published in 1972. It is the official publication of the [American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM)](http://www.sportsmed.org/)! The journal acts as an important forum for independent orthopaedic sports medicine research and education, allowing clinical practitioners the ability to make decisions based on sound scientific information. This journal is a must-read for: * Orthopaedic Surgeons and Specialists * Sports Medicine Physicians * Physiatrists * Athletic Trainers * Team Physicians * And Physical Therapists
期刊最新文献
Successful Medial Meniscal Repair Reduces Knee Pain 10 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Exploring the Consequences of Subsequent Surgery With Causal Mediation Analysis in the MOON Cohort. Biomechanical Evaluation and Surface Analysis of Glenoid Reconstruction Using a Subtalar Joint Allograft for Significant Glenoid Bone Loss in Recurrent Shoulder Instability: A Novel Alternative Graft Option. Chronic Structural Adaptations of the Shoulder and Elbow Are Correlated in Professional Baseball Pitchers. Outcomes of Open Arthrotomy and Arthroscopic Surgery for Primary Synovial Chondromatosis of the Hip: A Comparative Study With Propensity Score Matching. Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Surgeon-Reported Causes of Failure From the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1