Glycemic Control and Diabetes Duration in Relation to Subsequent Myocardial Infarction among Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Type 2 Diabetes.

Fu Rong Li, Yan Dou, Chun Bao Mo, Shuang Wang, Jing Zheng, Dong Feng Gu, Feng Chao Liang
{"title":"Glycemic Control and Diabetes Duration in Relation to Subsequent Myocardial Infarction among Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Type 2 Diabetes.","authors":"Fu Rong Li, Yan Dou, Chun Bao Mo, Shuang Wang, Jing Zheng, Dong Feng Gu, Feng Chao Liang","doi":"10.3967/bes2024.187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the impact of glycemic control and diabetes duration on subsequent myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with both coronary heart disease (CHD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 33,238 patients with both CHD and T2D in Shenzhen, China. Patients were categorized into 6 groups based on baseline fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels and diabetes duration (from the date of diabetes diagnosis to the baseline date) to examine their combined effects on subsequent MI. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used, with further stratification by age, sex, and comorbidities to assess potential interactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median follow-up of 2.4 years, 2,110 patients experienced MI. Compared to those with optimal glycemic control (FPG < 6.1 mmol/L) and shorter diabetes duration (< 10 years), the fully-adjusted hazard ratio ( <i>HR</i>) (95% Confidence Interval [95% <i>CI</i>]) for those with a diabetes duration of ≥ 10 years and FPG > 8.0 mmol/L was 1.93 (95% <i>CI</i>: 1.59, 2.36). The combined effects of FPG and diabetes duration on MI were largely similar across different age, sex, and comorbidity groups, although the excess risk of MI associated with long-term diabetes appeared to be more pronounced among those with atrial fibrillation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study indicates that glycemic control and diabetes duration significant influence the subsequent occurrence of MI in patients with both CHD and T2D. Tailored management strategies emphasizing strict glycemic control may be particularly beneficial for patients with longer diabetes duration and atrial fibrillation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93903,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES","volume":"38 1","pages":"27-36"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3967/bes2024.187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the impact of glycemic control and diabetes duration on subsequent myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with both coronary heart disease (CHD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 33,238 patients with both CHD and T2D in Shenzhen, China. Patients were categorized into 6 groups based on baseline fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels and diabetes duration (from the date of diabetes diagnosis to the baseline date) to examine their combined effects on subsequent MI. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used, with further stratification by age, sex, and comorbidities to assess potential interactions.

Results: Over a median follow-up of 2.4 years, 2,110 patients experienced MI. Compared to those with optimal glycemic control (FPG < 6.1 mmol/L) and shorter diabetes duration (< 10 years), the fully-adjusted hazard ratio ( HR) (95% Confidence Interval [95% CI]) for those with a diabetes duration of ≥ 10 years and FPG > 8.0 mmol/L was 1.93 (95% CI: 1.59, 2.36). The combined effects of FPG and diabetes duration on MI were largely similar across different age, sex, and comorbidity groups, although the excess risk of MI associated with long-term diabetes appeared to be more pronounced among those with atrial fibrillation.

Conclusion: Our study indicates that glycemic control and diabetes duration significant influence the subsequent occurrence of MI in patients with both CHD and T2D. Tailored management strategies emphasizing strict glycemic control may be particularly beneficial for patients with longer diabetes duration and atrial fibrillation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠心病和2型糖尿病患者血糖控制和糖尿病病程与继发心肌梗死的关系
目的:本研究旨在探讨血糖控制和糖尿病病程对冠心病(CHD)和2型糖尿病(T2D)患者继发心肌梗死(MI)的影响。方法:我们在中国深圳对33,238例冠心病和T2D患者进行了回顾性队列研究。根据基线空腹血糖(FPG)水平和糖尿病病程(从糖尿病诊断日期到基线日期)将患者分为6组,以检查其对后续心肌梗死的综合影响。使用Cox比例风险回归模型,并根据年龄、性别和合并症进一步分层,以评估潜在的相互作用。结果:在中位随访2.4年期间,2110例患者发生心肌梗死。与血糖控制最佳(FPG < 6.1 mmol/L)和糖尿病病程较短(< 10年)的患者相比,糖尿病病程≥10年且FPG > 8.0 mmol/L的患者的完全调整风险比(HR)(95%置信区间[95% CI])为1.93 (95% CI: 1.59, 2.36)。FPG和糖尿病持续时间对心肌梗死的综合影响在不同年龄、性别和合并症组中基本相似,尽管房颤患者与长期糖尿病相关的心肌梗死风险增加更为明显。结论:我们的研究表明,血糖控制和糖尿病病程对冠心病合并T2D患者随后发生心肌梗死有显著影响。量身定制的管理策略强调严格的血糖控制可能特别有利于患者糖尿病持续时间较长和房颤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Epidemiological Characteristics of Varicella and Population Immunity against Varicella-zoster Virus in Fujian Province, China, from 2018 to 2024. Serum Trace Elements and Their Associations with Disease Progression and Survival in Sporadic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Insights from a Chinese Cohort. Intermittent Hypoxia-Hyperoxia Training Ameliorates Symptoms and Improves Cerebral Perfusion Status in Patients with Cerebral Venous Outflow Disorders: A Pilot Study. Lipid-related Insulin Resistance Indices for the Diagnosis of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Chinese Adults. Spatiotemporal Variability of Influencing Factors on Tuberculosis Incidence in Jiangsu Province, China during 2011-2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1