Influence of Ferrule Design and Occlusal Thickness on the Fracture Resistance and Failure Patterns of Zirconia Endocrowns.

IF 0.9 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-30 DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1032_24
Subhendu Kumar Panda, Tapan Kumar Patro, Angurbala Dhal, Lokanath Garhnayak, Ullash Kumar, Nagen Ray Pattanaik
{"title":"Influence of Ferrule Design and Occlusal Thickness on the Fracture Resistance and Failure Patterns of Zirconia Endocrowns.","authors":"Subhendu Kumar Panda, Tapan Kumar Patro, Angurbala Dhal, Lokanath Garhnayak, Ullash Kumar, Nagen Ray Pattanaik","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1032_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Zirconia endocrowns are a popular restorative option due to their fracture resistance and aesthetic appeal, but the influence of different preparation designs on their performance remains underexplored. This study evaluated the effects of preparation design and the occlusal thickness on the fracture strength and failure modes of zirconia endocrowns in endodontically treated teeth.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-two extracted human mandibular first molars were endodontically treated and divided into four groups (n = 8), based on margin design and occlusal thickness: Group A: 2 mm butt joint with 3 mm occlusal thickness, Group B: 1 mm butt joint with 4 mm occlusal thickness, Group C: 2 mm ferrule with 3 mm occlusal thickness, and Group D: 1 mm ferrule with 4 mm occlusal thickness. Zirconia endocrowns were fabricated using CAD/CAM technology and cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. The specimens were subjected to thermocycling and then tested for fracture strength using a universal testing machine. Failure modes were analyzed under a stereomicroscope. Data were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group B showed the highest mean fracture strength (6655.66 N), followed by Group D at 6091.00 N. Group C exhibited the lowest fracture strength (4867.41 N), although the differences were not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.121). Type V failure was the most common failure mode across all groups, with 100% occurrence in both 2 mm margin groups (Groups A and C).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Margin design and occlusal thickness appeared to influence the fracture strength and failure modes of zirconia endocrowns; the differences were not significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"16 Suppl 4","pages":"S3541-S3543"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1032_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Zirconia endocrowns are a popular restorative option due to their fracture resistance and aesthetic appeal, but the influence of different preparation designs on their performance remains underexplored. This study evaluated the effects of preparation design and the occlusal thickness on the fracture strength and failure modes of zirconia endocrowns in endodontically treated teeth.

Materials and methods: Thirty-two extracted human mandibular first molars were endodontically treated and divided into four groups (n = 8), based on margin design and occlusal thickness: Group A: 2 mm butt joint with 3 mm occlusal thickness, Group B: 1 mm butt joint with 4 mm occlusal thickness, Group C: 2 mm ferrule with 3 mm occlusal thickness, and Group D: 1 mm ferrule with 4 mm occlusal thickness. Zirconia endocrowns were fabricated using CAD/CAM technology and cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. The specimens were subjected to thermocycling and then tested for fracture strength using a universal testing machine. Failure modes were analyzed under a stereomicroscope. Data were statistically analyzed.

Results: Group B showed the highest mean fracture strength (6655.66 N), followed by Group D at 6091.00 N. Group C exhibited the lowest fracture strength (4867.41 N), although the differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.121). Type V failure was the most common failure mode across all groups, with 100% occurrence in both 2 mm margin groups (Groups A and C).

Conclusion: Margin design and occlusal thickness appeared to influence the fracture strength and failure modes of zirconia endocrowns; the differences were not significant.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡箍设计和咬合厚度对氧化锆内冠抗断裂和破坏模式的影响。
背景与目的:氧化锆内冠因其抗断裂性和美观性而成为一种流行的修复选择,但不同的制备设计对其性能的影响尚不清楚。本研究评估了制备设计和咬合厚度对氧化锆根管治疗后牙齿断裂强度和破坏模式的影响。材料与方法:对32颗拔除的人下颌第一磨牙进行根管治疗,根据切缘设计和咬合厚度分为4组(n = 8): A组:2 mm对接关节,咬合厚度为3 mm; B组:1 mm对接关节,咬合厚度为4 mm; C组:2 mm卡箍,咬合厚度为3 mm;采用CAD/CAM技术制备氧化锆内冠,并采用自粘树脂胶结。试样进行热循环,然后使用万能试验机进行断裂强度测试。在体视显微镜下分析了失效模式。对数据进行统计学分析。结果:B组平均断裂强度最高,为6655.66 N, D组次之,为6091.00 N, C组最低,为4867.41 N,但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.121)。V型破坏是所有组中最常见的破坏模式,2 mm切缘组(A组和C组)的发生率均为100%。结论:切缘设计和咬合厚度影响氧化锆内冠的断裂强度和破坏模式;差异不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Salivary Osteocalcin Level Among Smokers and Non-Smokers Undergoing Dental Implants: An Observational Study. Influence of Reciprocating vs Rotary Kinematics on Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Treatment: A Multicenter Randomized Trial. Association of Sleep Disorders with Temporomandibular Joint Pain Dysfunction Syndrome. Clinical Evaluation of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo in Patients after Mild to Moderate Head Trauma. Knowledge, Perceptions and Attitude Towards Effect of Screen Time among Undergraduate Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1