Optimising Aspirin Use for Pre-Eclampsia Prevention: The Critical Role of Dose, Timing and Adherence

Bethany Atkins, Dimitrios Siassakos
{"title":"Optimising Aspirin Use for Pre-Eclampsia Prevention: The Critical Role of Dose, Timing and Adherence","authors":"Bethany Atkins, Dimitrios Siassakos","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is abundant evidence that aspirin, commenced at 12 weeks gestation, can be very effective in preventing pre-eclampsia, including preterm pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery and severe pre-eclampsia variants such as HELLP syndrome. However, some clinicians may consider it only modestly effective and neglect its use. Thus, attempts to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with pre-eclampsia may focus instead on managing its complications, and developing new diagnostics and drugs. Aspirin is hypothesised to improve placental development, either preventing entirely or delaying onset of pre-eclampsia.</p>\n<p>The Cochrane review by Duley et al. [<span>1</span>] describes a ‘small-to-moderate’ benefit of aspirin in preventing pre-eclampsia, preterm birth, small-for-gestational age and perinatal death. However, of 34 514 women with individual patient data available, only 9272 were randomised before 16 weeks gestation, and only 5070 received &gt; 75 mg per day. Does the amalgamation of low- and high-doses, with early and late commencement of aspirin give the appearance of lower efficacy, and dissuade clinicians from prioritising aspirin?</p>\n<p>In resource-limited contexts, where the likelihood of healthy survival to adulthood is significantly lower for preterm infants [<span>2</span>], the importance of a safe, low-cost intervention such as aspirin is even more important. Underestimation of low-cost, effective interventions such as aspirin may cause considerable harm [<span>2</span>].</p>\n<p>This editorial seeks to review the impact of dosage, timing and adherence to aspirin on its efficacy in pre-eclampsia prevention, and explore special considerations for utilisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8984,"journal":{"name":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.18095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is abundant evidence that aspirin, commenced at 12 weeks gestation, can be very effective in preventing pre-eclampsia, including preterm pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery and severe pre-eclampsia variants such as HELLP syndrome. However, some clinicians may consider it only modestly effective and neglect its use. Thus, attempts to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with pre-eclampsia may focus instead on managing its complications, and developing new diagnostics and drugs. Aspirin is hypothesised to improve placental development, either preventing entirely or delaying onset of pre-eclampsia.

The Cochrane review by Duley et al. [1] describes a ‘small-to-moderate’ benefit of aspirin in preventing pre-eclampsia, preterm birth, small-for-gestational age and perinatal death. However, of 34 514 women with individual patient data available, only 9272 were randomised before 16 weeks gestation, and only 5070 received > 75 mg per day. Does the amalgamation of low- and high-doses, with early and late commencement of aspirin give the appearance of lower efficacy, and dissuade clinicians from prioritising aspirin?

In resource-limited contexts, where the likelihood of healthy survival to adulthood is significantly lower for preterm infants [2], the importance of a safe, low-cost intervention such as aspirin is even more important. Underestimation of low-cost, effective interventions such as aspirin may cause considerable harm [2].

This editorial seeks to review the impact of dosage, timing and adherence to aspirin on its efficacy in pre-eclampsia prevention, and explore special considerations for utilisation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Zona Pellucida Gene Variants With Female Infertility: A Retrospective Genetic Analysis Optimising Aspirin Use for Pre-Eclampsia Prevention: The Critical Role of Dose, Timing and Adherence Effect of Comprehensive Individualised Interventions on the Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Recurrent Implantation Failure: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study Twelve-Year Follow-Up of a Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Versus Mid-Urethral Sling Surgery for Female Moderate to Severe Urinary Incontinence Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Pregnant Women With Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Study on 9 Million Pregnancies and 40 Cases of Lung Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1