Nutrient resorption of leaves and roots coordinates with root nutrient-acquisition strategies in a temperate forest

IF 8.3 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES New Phytologist Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1111/nph.70001
Dongnan Wang, Grégoire T. Freschet, M. Luke McCormack, Hans Lambers, Jiacun Gu
{"title":"Nutrient resorption of leaves and roots coordinates with root nutrient-acquisition strategies in a temperate forest","authors":"Dongnan Wang, Grégoire T. Freschet, M. Luke McCormack, Hans Lambers, Jiacun Gu","doi":"10.1111/nph.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>\n</p><ul>\n<li>Nutrient acquisition, conservation and recycling are three mechanisms for plants to meet their nutritional requirements. However, how nutrient recycling relates to other mechanisms remains unknown. Here, we hypothesize that nutrient resorption processes are coordinated with plant nutrient-acquisition strategies.</li>\n<li>We measured leaf and root nutrient resorption efficiencies and proficiencies and root economic traits for 34 coexisting ectomycorrhizal (ECM) and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) temperate woody species.</li>\n<li>Our results revealed that species with lower foraging efficiency relying on mycorrhizal fungi for nutrient absorption (e.g. larger root diameter) have higher root phosphorus resorption efficiency and greater phosphorus concentrations of senesced roots, while species with conservative nutrient-acquisition strategies (e.g. higher root tissue density) have lower nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations of senesced leaves and roots.</li>\n<li>Overall, our results demonstrate that plant nutrient acquisition and protection strategies are partly coordinated with plants' ability to resorb nutrients. First, they suggest that outsourcing phosphorus acquisition to mycorrhiza may limit the value for plants to reduce phosphorus loss. Second, those species better able to protect their living leaves and roots from adversity are not necessarily the most efficient to recycle nutrients, but are nonetheless the most capable of minimizing nutrient loss during organ senescence.</li>\n</ul><p></p>","PeriodicalId":214,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":"177 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.70001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

  • Nutrient acquisition, conservation and recycling are three mechanisms for plants to meet their nutritional requirements. However, how nutrient recycling relates to other mechanisms remains unknown. Here, we hypothesize that nutrient resorption processes are coordinated with plant nutrient-acquisition strategies.
  • We measured leaf and root nutrient resorption efficiencies and proficiencies and root economic traits for 34 coexisting ectomycorrhizal (ECM) and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) temperate woody species.
  • Our results revealed that species with lower foraging efficiency relying on mycorrhizal fungi for nutrient absorption (e.g. larger root diameter) have higher root phosphorus resorption efficiency and greater phosphorus concentrations of senesced roots, while species with conservative nutrient-acquisition strategies (e.g. higher root tissue density) have lower nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations of senesced leaves and roots.
  • Overall, our results demonstrate that plant nutrient acquisition and protection strategies are partly coordinated with plants' ability to resorb nutrients. First, they suggest that outsourcing phosphorus acquisition to mycorrhiza may limit the value for plants to reduce phosphorus loss. Second, those species better able to protect their living leaves and roots from adversity are not necessarily the most efficient to recycle nutrients, but are nonetheless the most capable of minimizing nutrient loss during organ senescence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Phytologist
New Phytologist 生物-植物科学
自引率
5.30%
发文量
728
期刊介绍: New Phytologist is an international electronic journal published 24 times a year. It is owned by the New Phytologist Foundation, a non-profit-making charitable organization dedicated to promoting plant science. The journal publishes excellent, novel, rigorous, and timely research and scholarship in plant science and its applications. The articles cover topics in five sections: Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology. These sections encompass intracellular processes, global environmental change, and encourage cross-disciplinary approaches. The journal recognizes the use of techniques from molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches in plant science. Abstracting and Indexing Information for New Phytologist includes Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Agroforestry Abstracts, Biochemistry & Biophysics Citation Index, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Environment Index, Global Health, and Plant Breeding Abstracts, and others.
期刊最新文献
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi regulate the diversity–invasion resistance relationship by influencing the role of complementarity and selection effects MdHY5: bridging auxin and abscisic acid pathways to bolster cold tolerance in apple Continental-scale empirical evidence for relationships between fire response strategies and fire frequency Lucas A. Cernusak Nutrient resorption of leaves and roots coordinates with root nutrient-acquisition strategies in a temperate forest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1