What promotes the integration of metro and ridesourcing? Analysis of first/last mile ridesourcing origin–destination trips

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION Travel Behaviour and Society Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.tbs.2025.100994
Tanhua Jin , Long Cheng , Kunbo Shi , Jun Cao , Jonas De Vos , Frank Witlox
{"title":"What promotes the integration of metro and ridesourcing? Analysis of first/last mile ridesourcing origin–destination trips","authors":"Tanhua Jin ,&nbsp;Long Cheng ,&nbsp;Kunbo Shi ,&nbsp;Jun Cao ,&nbsp;Jonas De Vos ,&nbsp;Frank Witlox","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2025.100994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Shared mobility can be regarded as a possible solution for sustainable transportation across the world. The integration between shared mobility and metro systems can relieve severe social and environmental issues. Although studies on integrating metro services and ridesourcing have gradually increased, those focusing on access/egress origin–destination trips are rather limited. Those focusing on access/egress origin–destination trips are rather limited. This study employs XGBoost models to examine the impact of trip distance, as well as the origin and destination factors, on the metro-ridesourcing integrated access/egress trips during weekday morning and evening peak hours using ridesourcing trip record data in Nanjing, China. Most factors have similar effects on metro-ridesourcing integrated usage, regardless of type differences and temporal heterogeneity. For example, all four types of integrated usage are positively associated with the density of bike-sharing services at both metro station sides and Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) sides. An interesting finding is that symmetric effects are found regarding the distance of TAZs to the city center, TAZ-side employment density, residence density, and population-to-employment balance index. The association between these factors and morning-peak access usage is similar to that for evening-peak egress usage, and morning-peak egress usage shares similar patterns with evening-peak access usage. Understanding how the influencing factors affect different types of metro-ridesourcing integrated usage can gain refined results and thus provide targeted policies to policymakers and shared mobility operators to further promote multimodal metro use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 100994"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X25000122","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shared mobility can be regarded as a possible solution for sustainable transportation across the world. The integration between shared mobility and metro systems can relieve severe social and environmental issues. Although studies on integrating metro services and ridesourcing have gradually increased, those focusing on access/egress origin–destination trips are rather limited. Those focusing on access/egress origin–destination trips are rather limited. This study employs XGBoost models to examine the impact of trip distance, as well as the origin and destination factors, on the metro-ridesourcing integrated access/egress trips during weekday morning and evening peak hours using ridesourcing trip record data in Nanjing, China. Most factors have similar effects on metro-ridesourcing integrated usage, regardless of type differences and temporal heterogeneity. For example, all four types of integrated usage are positively associated with the density of bike-sharing services at both metro station sides and Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) sides. An interesting finding is that symmetric effects are found regarding the distance of TAZs to the city center, TAZ-side employment density, residence density, and population-to-employment balance index. The association between these factors and morning-peak access usage is similar to that for evening-peak egress usage, and morning-peak egress usage shares similar patterns with evening-peak access usage. Understanding how the influencing factors affect different types of metro-ridesourcing integrated usage can gain refined results and thus provide targeted policies to policymakers and shared mobility operators to further promote multimodal metro use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
期刊最新文献
Car ownership through the parenting journey and beyond Built environment effects on dockless bikesharing–metro integration: A spatial nonlinear analysis Traffic crash risk among on-demand food delivery riders in Danang city, Vietnam: Key contributing factors Changes in the predictors of transit ridership in post-COVID-19 US metropolitan areas Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1